Multi-reader evaluation of different image quality scoring systems in prostate MRI.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate different image quality scoring systems in the assessment of factors limiting diagnostic accuracy of prostate MRI. METHODS: This retrospective IRB-approved study included 281 patients undergoing prostate MRI prior to biopsy. Four readers (2 experienced, 2 novice) independently reviewed all MRI examinations (n = 295) and assigned scores for subjective image quality (1-5; 1:poor, 5:excellent), the PI-QUAL and the PSHS scoring system. The original PI-RADS scores were extracted from the report and transperineal template saturation biopsy served as histopathological reference. RESULTS: Inter-reader agreement was found to be good, with PSHS showing highest agreement (kappa: 0.65). The PSHS scoring system performed well assessing the influence of image quality on sensitivity of MR for clinically-significant cancer for the experienced readers using a PI-RADS score cut-off ≥ 3/≥4, as did the PI-QUAL scoring system with a PI-RADS cut-off ≥ 4. For the less experienced radiologist, this was true for PSHS (clinically-significant and all cancers) and PI-QUAL scores (clinically-significant cancers) for a PI-RADS score ≥ 3. PSHS scores were positively associated with the detection of clinically-significant cancer based on a PI-RADS cut-off ≥ 4, OR 1.86 (95 % CI 1.22-2.82), and had the highest Somers' D. CONCLUSIONS: The PSHS scoring system performed well in assessing the effect of image quality on detection rates, as did the PI-QUAL system. Since both systems focus on different aspects of image quality, their incorporation into prostate MRI reports could further enhance standardization and allow for a reliable assessment of image quality as a potential confounder in prostate MRI.

Fetal malformation in maternal toxoplasma and rubella co-infection in Cameroon: a case report.

BACKGROUND: There has been a recent increase in the number of newborns with brain malformations due to congenital infections, but the impact of these diseases remains largely under ascertained in middle-income and low-income countries. This case report presents a fetal anencephaly following maternal toxoplasma and rubella co-infection in a resource-limited setting and the challenges faced by the patient and the health care provider in the management of the condition. CASE PRESENTATION: A 25-year-old black Cameroonian woman of Bakossi origin, gravida3 para1010, presented with a positive rubella and toxoplasma immunoglobulin G serologic test at 21 weeks of pregnancy; she could not benefit from a fetal morphologic ultrasound partly because there was none at the site of her antenatal clinic and because there were accessibility constraints getting to the nearest referral hospital approximately 100 km away. She returned to the hospital in labor pains 14 weeks later and, upon examination, she was observed to be at almost full cervical dilatation and had a stillbirth a few minutes later; a baby boy weighing 1600 g with anencephaly. The devastated parents of the baby were counseled and given psychological support. She was discharged from hospital 3 days later and now benefits from continual follow up as out-patient. She was advised to consult a gynecologist-obstetrician before her next pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Much attention still has to be paid to ameliorate the health care in resource-limited settings where pregnant women generally obtain less than adequate care.