Total reference air kerma can accurately predict isodose surface volumes in cervix cancer brachytherapy. A multicenter study.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate that V60 Gy, V75 Gy, and V85 Gy isodose surface volumes can be accurately estimated from total reference air kerma (TRAK) in cervix cancer MRI-guided brachytherapy (BT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: 60 Gy, 75 Gy, and 85 Gy isodose surface volumes levels were obtained from treatment planning systems (VTPS) for 239 EMBRACE study patients from five institutions treated with various dose rates, fractionation schedules and applicators. An equation for estimating VTPS from TRAK was derived. Furthermore, a surrogate Point A dose (Point A*) was proposed and tested for correlation with V75 Gy. RESULTS: Predicted volumes Vpred = 4965 (TRAK/dref) 3/2 + 170 (TRAK/dref) - 1.5 gave the best fit to VTPS. The difference between VTPS and predicted volumes was 0.0% ± 2.3%. All volumes were predicted within 10%. The prediction was valid for (1) high-dose rate and pulsed dose rate, (2) intracavitary vs. intracavitary/interstitial applicators, and (3) tandem-ring, tandem-ovoid, and mold. Point A* = 14 TRAK was converted to total EQD2 and showed high correlation with V75 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: TRAK derived Isodose surface volumes may become a tool for assessment of treatment intensity. Furthermore, surrogate Point A∗ doses can be applied for both intracavitary and intracavitary/interstitial BT and can be used to compare treatments across fractionation schedules.

Use of bladder dose points for assessment of the spatial dose distribution in the posterior bladder wall in cervical cancer brachytherapy and the impact of applicator position.

PURPOSE: To validate the feasibility and use of dose points to characterize the bladder wall dose distribution and investigate potential impact of the applicator position in cervical cancer brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred twenty-eight optimized MRI plans were evaluated. The International Commission of Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU-38) point doses (B(ICRU)), surrogate for bladder base doses, were compared with D(2cc). Vaginal source to superior-anterior border of the symphysis distances were measured and compared within two groups, namely Group 1-B(ICRU)/D(2cc) ≥1 and Group 2-B(ICRU)/D(2cc) <1. Additionally, points at 1.5 and 2 cm cranial to the B(ICRU), parallel to the tandem and the body axis were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-seven percent of the patients had the ratio B(ICRU)/D(2cc) of 1 or higher, with the 2cc subvolume at the bladder base (Group 1). In 63%, BICRU/D2cc ratio was lower than 1 and the 2cc, cranial to the bladder base (Group 2). Median vaginal source-to-superior-anterior border of the symphysis line distance was -2 cm (range, -3.7 to +1.2 cm) in Group 1 and +1.8 cm (range, -2 to +4.8 cm) in Group 2 (+ cranial/- caudal direction). There was a high correlation between vaginal sources near the symphysis and the 2cc subvolume at the bladder base. The additional points provided no added value. CONCLUSIONS: Location of the 2cc subvolume varies in cervical cancer brachytherapy. Maximum doses are at the bladder base if vaginal sources are also in the vicinity of the bladder base indicated by B(ICRU)/D(2cc) ratio of 1 or higher. Such variation should be considered in dose-effect analyses and intercomparisons, as the same D(2cc) at different bladder locations may correlate with different morbidity profiles and severity Reporting D(2cc) and B(ICRU) doses together therefore remains essential.

Single line source with and without vaginal loading and the impact on target coverage and organ at risk doses for cervix cancer Stages IB, II, and IIIB: treatment planning simulation in patients treated with MRI-guided adaptive brachytherapy in a multicentre study (EMBRACE).

PURPOSE: Three-dimensional evaluation and comparison of target and organs at risk (OARs) doses from two traditional standard source loading patterns in the frame of MRI-guided cervical cancer brachytherapy for various clinical scenarios based on patient data collected in a multicenter trial setting. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two nonoptimized three-dimensional MRI-based treatment plans, Plan 1 (tandem and vaginal loading) and Plan 2 (tandem loading only), were generated for 134 patients from seven centers participating in the EMBRACE study. Both plans were normalized to point A (Pt. A). Target and OAR doses were evaluated in terms of minimum dose to 90% of the high-risk clinical target volume (HRCTV D90) grouped by tumor stage and minimum dose to the most exposed 2cm³ of the OARs volume. RESULTS: An HRCTV D90 ≥ Pt. A was achieved in 82% and 44% of the patients with Plans 1 and 2, respectively. Median HRCTV D90 with Plans 1 and 2 was 120% and 90% of Pt. A dose, respectively. Both plans had optimal dose coverage in 88% of Stage IB tumors; however, the tandem-only plan resulted in about 50% of dose reduction to the vagina and rectum. For Stages IIB and IIIB, Plan 1 had on average 35% better target coverage but with significant doses to OARs. CONCLUSIONS: Standard tandem loading alone results in good target coverage in most Stage IB tumors without violating OAR dose constraints. For Stage IIB tumors, standard vaginal loading improves the therapeutic window, however needs optimization to fulfill the dose prescription for target and OAR. In Stage IIIB, even optimized vaginal loading often does not fulfill the needs for dose prescription. The significant dose variation across various clinical scenarios for both target and OARs indicates the need for image-guided brachytherapy for optimal dose adaptation both for limited and advanced diseases.