Relationship between hearing loss and prevalence of depressive symptoms in Japan: Baseline data from the Aidai Cohort study in Yawatahama and Uchiko.

OBJECTIVE: Epidemiological evidence on the relationship between hearing loss (HL) and depressive symptoms, especially in the middle aged, is limited. The present cross-sectional study investigated this issue in middle-aged and older Japanese individuals separately. METHODS: Study subjects were 1018 Japanese adults aged 36-84 years. We used the audiometric definition of HL, which identifies the speech-frequency pure tone average (PTA) hearing thresholds at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz as an average of four frequencies. HL was defined as present when PTA was > 25 dB HL in the better-hearing ear. Presence of depressive symptoms was defined as a Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale score ≥ 16. Adjustment was made for age, sex, smoking status, alcohol consumption, leisure time physical activity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, body mass index, waist circumference, employment, education, and household income. RESULTS: The prevalence values of HL and depressive symptoms were 11.5% and 15.0%, respectively, among the 575 subjects aged < 65 years and 42.2% and 10.4%, respectively, among the 443 subjects aged ≥ 65 years. Among the 1018 participants, HL was independently related to a higher prevalence of depressive symptoms: the multivariate-adjusted OR was 1.92 (95% CI: 1.19-3.08). This positive association was stronger among middle-aged participants, with a multivariate-adjusted OR of 2.70 (95% CI: 1.34-5.27), but was not significant in the elderly, with a multivariate-adjusted OR of 1.71 (95% CI: 0.83-3.54). CONCLUSION: HL may be positively associated with depressive symptoms in middle-aged, but not older, individuals.

Establishment of reference costs for occupational health services and implementation of cost management in Japanese manufacturing companies.

OBJECTIVES: We developed a standardized cost estimation method for occupational health (OH) services. The purpose of this study was to set reference OH services costs and to conduct OH services cost management assessments in two workplaces by comparing actual OH services costs with the reference costs. METHODS: Data were obtained from retrospective analyses of OH services costs regarding 15 OH activities over a 1-year period in three manufacturing workplaces. We set the reference OH services costs in one of the three locations and compared OH services costs of each of the two other workplaces with the reference costs. RESULTS: The total reference OH services cost was 176,654 Japanese yen (JPY) per employee. The personnel cost for OH staff to conduct OH services was JPY 47,993, and the personnel cost for non-OH staff was JPY 38,699. The personnel cost for receipt of OH services-opportunity cost-was JPY 19,747, expense was JPY 25,512, depreciation expense was 34,849, and outsourcing cost was JPY 9,854. We compared actual OH services costs from two workplaces (the total OH services costs were JPY 182,151 and JPY 238,023) with the reference costs according to OH activity. The actual costs were different from the reference costs, especially in the case of personnel cost for non-OH staff, expense, and depreciation expense. CONCLUSIONS: Using our cost estimation tool, it is helpful to compare actual OH services cost data with reference cost data. The outcomes help employers make informed decisions regarding investment in OH services.

Development of cost estimation tools for total occupational safety and health activities and occupational health services: cost estimation from a corporate perspective.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to develop standardized cost estimation tools that provide information to employers about occupational safety and health (OSH) activities for effective and efficient decision making in Japanese companies. METHODS: We interviewed OSH staff members including full-time professional occupational physicians to list all OSH activities. Using activity-based costing, cost data were obtained from retrospective analyses of occupational safety and health costs over a 1-year period in three manufacturing workplaces and were obtained from retrospective analyses of occupational health services costs in four manufacturing workplaces. We verified the tools additionally in four workplaces including service businesses. RESULTS: We created the OSH and occupational health standardized cost estimation tools. OSH costs consisted of personnel costs, expenses, outsourcing costs and investments for 15 OSH activities. The tools provided accurate, relevant information on OSH activities and occupational health services. CONCLUSIONS: The standardized information obtained from our OSH and occupational health cost estimation tools can be used to manage OSH costs, make comparisons of OSH costs between companies and organizations and help occupational health physicians and employers to determine the best course of action.