Improvement in severe asthma patients receiving biologics and factors associated with persistent insufficient control: a real-life national study.

BACKGROUND: Biological therapies have revolutionized the treatment of severe asthma with type 2 inflammation. Although such treatments are very effective in reducing exacerbation and the dose of oral steroids, little is known about the persistence of symptoms in severe asthma patients treated with biologics. PURPOSE: We aim to describe asthma control and healthcare consumption of severe asthma patients treated with biologics. DESIGN: The Second Souffle study is a real-life prospective observational study endorsed by the Clinical Research Initiative in Severe Asthma: a Lever for Innovation & Science Network. METHODS: Adults with a confirmed diagnosis of severe asthma for at least 12 months' duration were enrolled in the study. A self-administered questionnaire including the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) and a compliance evaluation test was given to the patients. Healthcare consumption within 12 months prior to enrolment was documented. In patients receiving biologics, doctors indicated whether the patients were biologic responders or non-responders. RESULTS: The characteristics of 431 patients with severe asthma were analysed. Among them, 409 patients (94.9%) presented asthma with type 2 inflammation (T2 high) profile, and 297 (72.6%) patients with a T2 high phenotype were treated with a biologic. Physicians estimated that 88.2% of patients receiving biologics were responders. However, asthma control was only achieved in 25.3% of those patients (ACQ > 0.75). A high proportion of patients (77.8%) identified as responders to biologics were not controlled according to the ACQ score. About 50% of patients continue to use oral corticosteroids either daily (25.2%) or more than three times a year for at least three consecutive days (25.6%). Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) and Obstructive Sleep Apnoea syndrome (OSA) were identified as independent factors associated with uncontrolled asthma. CONCLUSION: Although a high proportion of severe asthma patients respond to biologics, only 25.3% have controlled asthma. GERD and OSA are independent factors of uncontrolled asthma.

Mid-term pulmonary sequelae after hospitalisation for COVID-19: The French SISCOVID cohort.

BACKGROUND: Even though COVID-19 clinical features, pathogenesis, complications, and therapeutic options have been largely described in the literature, long-term consequences in patients remain poorly known. METHODS: The French, multicentre, non-interventional SISCOVID study evaluated lung impairment three (M3) and six months (M6) after hospital discharge in patients recovered from COVID-19. Evaluation was based on clinical examination, pulmonary function tests, and chest computed tomography (CT-scan). RESULTS: Of the 320 included patients (mean age: 61 years; men: 64.1%), 205 had had a severe form of COVID-19, being hospitalised in an intensive care unit (ICU), and requiring high flow nasal cannula, non-invasive ventilation, or invasive mechanical ventilation. At M6, 54.1% of included patients had persistent dyspnoea (mMRC score ≥1), 20.1% severe impairment in gas diffusing capacity (DLCO <60% pred.), 21.6% restrictive ventilatory pattern (total lung capacity <80% pred.), and 40% a fibrotic-like pattern at CT-scan. Fibrotic-like pattern and restrictive ventilatory pattern were significantly more frequent in patients recovered from severe than non-severe COVID-19. Improved functional and radiological outcomes were observed between M3 and M6. At M6, age was an independent risk factor for severe DLco impairment and fibrotic-like pattern and severe COVID-19 form was independent risk factor for restrictive ventilatory profile and fibrotic-like pattern. CONCLUSION: Six months after discharge, patients hospitalised for COVID-19, especially those recovered from a severe form of COVID-19, frequently presented persistent dyspnoea, lung function impairment, and persistent fibrotic-like pattern, confirming the need for long-term post-discharge follow-up in these patients and for further studies to better understand long-term COVID-19 lung impairment.

Phenotyping to Target Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Syndrom (OSAS) in adults patients with severe asthma.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) and severe asthma are frequently associated. This article focuses on the relationship between severe asthma phenotypes and OSAS. METHODS: FASE-CPHG was an observational, cross-sectional, prospective, multicentric study conducted in 104 non-academic hospitals from May-16 to July-17. 1465 patients with severe asthma were analysed and 1424 patients phenotyped. Clusters were compared for OSAS presence; independent factors associated with OSAS were identified by logistic regression. RESULTS: 11% of patients with severe asthma reported OSAS. OSAS incidence differed according to asthma phenotypes. 98% of OSAS patients belonged to the "obese asthma" cluster, and none to the "early onset allergic asthma" cluster. Independent factors associated with OSAS were obesity (OR=5.782 [3.927-8.512]), male gender (OR=3.047 [2.059-4.510]), high blood pressure (OR=2.875 [1.978-4.181]), depression (OR=2.552 [1.607-4.050]), late-onset asthma (OR=1.789 [1.167-2.743]) and atopy (OR=0.622 [0.408-0.948]). Moreover, OSAS patients were more frequently treated with long-term oral corticosteroids (30% vs 15%, p < 0.0001), that may contribute to the high prevalence of obesity in this group of patients. They were more frequently uncontrolled (78% vs 69%, p = 0.03) and they engaged in low level physical activity (vs 80% vs 68% p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study gives an innovative insight into OSAS associated with severe asthma. Most of patients with OSAS belonged to the cluster "obese asthma" and none to the cluster "early onset allergic asthma". In addition to male gender, arterial hypertension and depression, obese asthma, late onset asthma and non-atopic status were identified as specific risk factors. Oral corticosteroids seems to play a deleterious role. Phenotyping asthma can help physicians target severe asthmatic patients with OSAS and may avoid unnecessary examinations.

Susceptibility to frequent exacerbation in COPD patients: Impact of the exacerbations history, vaccinations and comorbidities?

INTRODUCTION: Exacerbations are key events in the natural history of COPD, but our understanding of their longitudinal determinants remains unclear. We used data from a large observational study to test the hypothesis that vaccination status and comorbidities could be associated with the occurrence of exacerbations profile. METHODS: Diagnosed COPD patients have been included by their pulmonologists, with up to 3 years of follow-up. Data were analyzed using the KmL method designed to cluster longitudinal data and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to determine the best threshold to allocate patients to identified clusters. RESULTS: 932 COPD patients were included since January 2014, 446 patients (65.68% males, 35.59% current smokers) were followed over a period of 3 years with complete data. 239(28.15%) patients reported two or more exacerbations in the year before enrolment (frequent exacerbations). Among them 142(16.68%) also had frequent exacerbations in the first year of the study, and 69(8.10%) who remained frequent exacerbators in the second year. Based on our hypothesis, we were able to determine four phenotypes: A (infrequent), B (frequent in underweight patients), C (transient), and D (frequent in obese patients). Frequent exacerbators had more airflow limitation and symptoms. Irrespective of cut-offs set to define the optimal number of clusters, a history of exacerbations OR: 3.72[2.53-5.49], presence of anxiety OR: 2.03[1.24-3.31] and absence of the annual influenza vaccination OR: 1.97[1.20-3.24] remained associated with the frequent exacerbator phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS: The most important determinants of frequent exacerbations are a history of exacerbations, anxiety and unvaccinated against influenza.

FASE-CPHG study: a panoramic snapshot of difficult-to-treat, severe asthma in French nonacademic hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Real-world data describing management of patients with severe asthma are limited. To address this issue, we conducted FASE-CPHG (France Asthme Sevère - Collège des Pneumologues des Hôpitaux Généraux), a descriptive, multicentric, and observational cross-sectional study. METHODS: French pulmonologists from nonacademic hospitals completed questionnaires on patient characteristics and ongoing asthma treatment for severe asthmatic patients observed during the inclusion period. In addition, we collected data from patients via self-assessment questionnaires. FINDINGS: 104 physicians recruited 1502 patients within 1 year. The mean age of the 1465 patients analysed was 54.4±16.1 years. Severe asthmatic patients were more frequently female (63%), with a history of atopy (65%). Most patients remained poorly controlled or uncontrolled, with an important difference between physicians' opinion and the Global Initiative for Asthma criteria (63% versus 96%). The most common comorbidities included ear, nose and throat diseases (59% of cases); anxiety (40%); and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (39%). Allergic sensitisation tests and/or blood eosinophil count evaluation, and spirometry were performed in 92% and 98% of patients, respectively. The mean eosinophil count and total serum IgE were 437 cells·mm-3 and 546 UI·L-1, respectively. In addition to high doses of inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting ß2-agonists, patients were receiving leukotriene receptor antagonists (52%), anticholinergic drugs (34%), anti IgE (27%) and oral corticosteroids (17%); 65% adhered to their treatment. INTERPRETATION: This study provides insight into the characteristics and management of severe asthma in France and may help improve knowledge on this pathology, which represents a high burden to healthcare.

Clinical characteristics and quality of life in women with COPD: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: The impact of COPD on patient's quality of life is well established, but gender differences have received little attention. METHODS: To describe factors associated with the health-related quality of life by gender: A cross-sectional observational study (NCT01007734) was conducted in COPD patients followed by pulmonologists. The first patient included had to be a woman. Data concerning the patient, COPD and their management were collected by the physician. The patient had to fill in several questionnaires: Saint-George Hospital respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ-C), and motivation to quit smoking. RESULTS: Four hundred and thirty patients were included: mean age 63.9 ± 11.3 years; 57.4% were women. Women were significantly younger than men (61.9 vs. 66.6) and their tobacco use was lower (37.1 vs. 40.4 PY). Cardiovascular comorbidities were more frequent in men while osteoporosis, anxiety and depression were frequent in women. The frequency of cough, sputum and the severity of dyspnea did not differ significantly between genders. Lung function impairment was less severe in women than in men (mean FEV1 52% predicted normal vs. 47. 8%). Anxiety score was higher (score 9.8 vs. 7.1) and quality of life (SGRQ-C) more impaired in women (scores 50.6 vs. 45.4; p < 0.02) than in men. Moreover, in multivariate analysis, chronic sputum was associated with higher SGRQ-C scores in women but not in men. CONCLUSIONS: This study underlines that despite less airflow limitation, quality of life is more impacted by chronic sputum in women than in men.