Evaluation of a planar diode matrix for SRS patient-specific QA in comparison with GAFchromic films.

PURPOSE: We validate the routine use of a two-dimensional (2D) diode matrix for patient specific pre-treatment verification for Cyberknife (CK) stereotactic radiosurgery and to compare it with film dosimetry. MATERIALS AND METHOD: A total of 46 patients were selected according to the most frequent diseases treated at our institution with the CK system, that is, brain metastases, meningiomas, spine metastases, and prostate tumors. All cases were evaluated with GAFChromic EBT-3 films and SRS MapCHECK for Fixed cone, IRIS, and MLC collimators of the CK. RESULTS: The highest mean passing rate was observed for the SRS MapCHECK system compared to films. In order to assess if the two techniques provide statistically different results, a Wilcoxon Signed-Rank non-parametric test was performed (p < 0.05) and we found gamma values significantly lower for EBT-3 films with respect to the SRS MapCHECK. We noticed a moderately significant association between the two techniques using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rs > 0.4). We also performed the Bland-Altman statistical method: less than 5% of the differences resulted outside the range (mean ± 1.96 × SD), so the two methods can be considered interchangeable within the combined inaccuracy. CONCLUSIONS: The use of SRS MapCHECK for CK patient specific quality assurance (QA) is feasible for a variety of clinical districts and could be reliably used as a replacement for radiochromic films.

Comparison of methods to determine accurate dose calibrator activity measurements.

BACKGROUND: In nuclear medicine, liquid radiopharmaceuticals for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes are administered to patients by using various types of syringes with different volumes. The activity of each "dose" must be carefully measured and documented prior to administration using an activity calibrator. METHODS: Calibrator response is a function of the measurement geometry and, in particular, it depends on the syringe type and filling volume. To minimize the uncertainty associated with the measured activity of the syringe, it is necessary to calculate a calibration curve depending on filling volume for each syringe type. This curve can be obtained by fitting experimentally determined volume correction factors. RESULTS: A theoretical evaluation of volume correction factors for syringes is reported for three different experimental methods. The aim is to determine the most accurate experimental method among those considered, by examining the expression of uncertainty for the correction factor. This theoretical analysis was then tested experimentally. CONCLUSION: The agreement between the experimental data obtained in the constant activity method and gravimetric method at constant specific activity and the small associated uncertainties show the accuracy of these two procedures; while the volumetric method at constant specific activity could lead to a wrong evaluation of the correction factors.