Practice Implications of Colonoscopic Investigation of Microscopic Colitis in Patients Above 50 Years of Age Presenting With Chronic Diarrhoea: A Multi-Centre Review.

Background Patients with an unknown cause for chronic diarrhoea will usually undergo a colonoscopy as part of the investigative work-up, and it is acceptable practice for the patients to undergo random biopsies. The optimum number of biopsies has yet to be established. This study investigated the implications of routine random biopsies for diagnosing microscopic colitis in patients 50 years and older who presented with chronic diarrhoea. Methodology A retrospective cohort study of a prospectively maintained internal hospital database across three tertiary teaching hospitals in Perth, Western Australia, on participants >50 years old who presented for an elective colonoscopy to investigate chronic diarrhoea between January 2016 and June 2019. Data was captured from medical records, imaging, colonoscopy, and histopathology reports, and patient follow-up was analysed using SPSS v.29 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results There were 216 patients, with the majority female (67%) and a mean age of 64.6 (SD±9.9). Microscopic colitis was identified in 7.4% (95% CI = 3.9-10.9%). Most positive biopsies (81.3%) were from the left colon. The median number of biopsies per case was seven (IQR=5). The median procedure duration and scope withdrawal time were 23 and eight minutes, respectively. Most of the procedures were done by a consultant (77%). Bowel was adequately prepped in 76.9% of the cases. Univariate analysis demonstrated that the rate of identification of microcolitis was associated with the number of biopsies taken; microcolitis positivity had a higher mean number of biopsies, 10.8 vs 6.7 (p<0.001). Key complications were a 30-day readmission rate, seven-day re-presentation with acute colitis, post-procedure bleeding, requiring further imaging or angioembolisation and increased length of stay on readmission. Conclusion The prevalence of positive biopsies for microcolitis is low (7.4%). Biopsies during colonoscopy are associated with clinically significant morbidity and health care costs. Most positive biopsies were attained from the left colon. It may be time to standardise practice in investigating microscopic colitis as a cause of chronic diarrhoea in patients > 50 years old.

Colonoscopy follow-up for acute diverticulitis: a multi-centre review.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the value of routine colonoscopy, post-computed tomography (CT) confirmed diverticulitis. The current practice is to scope patients 6-8 weeks post an episode of acute diverticulitis. We hypothesise that this practice has a relatively low value. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on adult patients presenting acute diverticulitis n = 1680 (uncomplicated = 1005, complicated = 675) between January 2017 and July 2019 at three tertiary hospitals in Perth. The National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP) positive cases were the reference group (n = 1800). Data were analysed using SPSS v.27. RESULTS: One thousand two hundred seventy-two patients had a subsequent colonoscopy during the follow-up period, of which 24% (n = 306) were uncomplicated diverticulitis, 34% (n = 432) complicated diverticulitis, and 42% (n = 534) as the reference cohort. Patient demographics were similar between centres and subgroups. Incidence of primary colorectal cancer (CRC) was n = 3 (1.0%), n = 9 (2.1%), and n = 10 (1.9%) for uncomplicated diverticulitis, complicated diverticulitis, and NBCSP, respectively (p = 0.50). Subgroup analysis by age revealed a statistically significant higher rate of negative colonoscopy in uncomplicated diverticulitis patients aged over 50. CONCLUSION: Routine colonoscopy for patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis is not a cost-effective strategy for colorectal cancer screening patients over 50 years. These patients should participate in the NBCSP with biennial FOBT instead. We suggest continuing routine endoscopic evaluation for patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis under 50 years and all patients admitted with complicated diverticulitis.

Colonic bowel prep and body mass index: does one size fit all? A multi-centre review.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether body mass index (BMI) is a risk factor for inadequate bowel preparation in elective colonoscopy. The null hypothesis being BMI does not affect bowel preparation adequacy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all participants with complete medical records who had an elective colonoscopy was conducted across three tertiary teaching hospitals in Perth, Western Australia, from January 2016 to July 2019. Participants were separated into BMI subgroups of healthy weight, overweight and obese (≥ 30 kg/m2). Data were extracted from medical records, colonoscopy and histopathology reports and were analysed using SPSS v.27. RESULTS: Of the 1082 cases analysed, 52.7% (n = 570) were male. The median age was 61 (range 18-85 years). The median BMI was 27.8 (range 20-52). The median procedure time is 28 (range 2-69 min). Routine follow-up was the clinical indication for 65% of colonoscopy procedures undertaken during the study period. Multivariate logistic regression, controlled for statistically insignificant confounders of age, type of bowel preparation agent, grade of the endoscopist, the indication for procedure and year of procedure, showed that being obese was significantly and independently associated with inadequate bowel preparation (OR 2.0, 95% CI (1.4-2.9) p < 0.001). Another significant factor was male (OR 1.6, 95% CI (1.2-2.1) p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: This study shows that obese patients are more likely to have inadequate bowel preparation at colonoscopy. Given the increased complication rates and health care costs associated with repeating colonoscopies and the increased risk of colorectal cancer in obese patients, it may be worth tailoring a more extensive bowel preparation regimen to ensure adequate visualisation of the colonic mucosa on the first attempt.