Arc reactivity in accumbens nucleus, amygdala and hippocampus differentiates cue over context responses during reactivation of opiate withdrawal memory.

Opiate withdrawal induces an early aversive state which can be associated to contexts and/or cues, and re-exposure to either these contexts or cues may participate in craving and relapse. Nucleus accumbens (NAC), hippocampus (HPC) and basolateral amygdala (BLA) are crucial substrates for acute opiate withdrawal, and for withdrawal memory retrieval. Also HPC and BLA interacting with the NAC are suggested to respectively mediate the processing of context and cue representations of drug-related memories. Here we used a paradigm of conditioned suppression of operant food seeking, allowing to differentiate context and cue related responses, to study the influence of withdrawal memories on operant behavior and the underlying neural substrates. catFISH for Arc mRNA expression was used to discriminate cellular responses during context and cue (flashing light) periods in this paradigm. We show that reactivation of the memory of the negative affective state of withdrawal suppresses active lever pressing for food, and this conditioned suppression is generalized to the context. Interestingly the behavioral responses during the context and cue light periods are associated with differential Arc mRNA activations within the NAC, BLA, and HPC. Indeed both periods led to NAC shell activation whereas the NAC core was responsive only following the cue light period. Moreover, BLA and HPC were more responsive during cue-light and context period respectively. These data further support the already reported differential role of these brain structures on cue vs context-induced reinstatement of operant behaviors, and highlight the existence of common mechanisms for the processing of positive and aversive emotional memories.

Attentional capacities prior to drug exposure predict motivation to self-administer nicotine.

RATIONALE: Nicotine can enhance attention and attribution of incentive salience to nicotine-associated stimuli. However, it is not clear whether inter-individual differences in attentional capacities prior to any exposure could play a role in vulnerability to nicotine self-administration. We further explored this vulnerability through pre-existing inter-individual differences in attention to a reward-predictive cue in drug-free animals. METHODS: A cued version of the Fixed Consecutive Number schedule (FCN16cue) of reinforcement task was used to assess attention. This task consists in completing a long chain of sequential lever presses to obtain a reward, and examines the rats' ability to pay attention to a cue light that signals its availability. Rats were then trained to self-administer nicotine intravenously (30 µg/kg/0.1 mL). Drug-taking and seeking behaviors were investigated. RESULTS: Our results showed important inter-individual differences in response for nicotine during the progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement. By comparing rats in the lower and upper quartiles of the mean breaking point, we showed that high-motivated rats were also more sensitive to the reinforcing properties of nicotine than low-motivated ones. We found that while both groups did not differ in premature responding in the FCN16cue task, high-motivated rats were more efficient in taking the cue light into account than low-motivated rats as shown by a higher proportion of optimal chains, indicating a higher level of attention to the reward-predictive cue. Moreover, it was positively correlated with higher motivation for nicotine, a hallmark of nicotine addiction. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that higher attention to reward-associated cues prior to drug taking predicts vulnerability to nicotine-reinforcing properties.