ABSTRACT
Acute aortic syndrome (AAS) comprises acute aortic dissection, intramural hematoma, and penetrating ulcer of the aorta. The importance of accurate, rapid diagnosis and intervention for AAS is underscored by its clinical and epidemiologic overlap with acute coronary syndrome and by the risks of inappropriate treatment with antithrombotic agents. To explore these concerns, the recognition, management, and outcomes of AAS in the contemporary experience of a tertiary referral center were reviewed. Sixty-six consecutive patients with AAS admitted from January 2000 to December 2004 were identified, and their records reviewed. Misdiagnosis occurred in 39% (n = 26) and was associated with longer time to correct diagnosis (mean +/- SEM 51 +/- 12 vs 15 +/- 5 hours, p = 0.003). Acute coronary syndrome was the most common misdiagnosis, resulting in inappropriate treatment with acetylsalicylic acid in 26 (100%), clopidogrel in 1 (4%), heparin in 22 (85%), and fibrinolytic agents in 3 (12%). Exposure to antithrombotic agents was associated with higher rates of major bleeding (38% vs 13%) and a trend toward greater in-hospital mortality (27% vs 13%) (p = 0.02 for combined end point). Antithrombotic agent administration was also associated with increased hemorrhagic pericardial fluid (50% vs 25%), hemorrhagic pleural effusion (15% vs 3%), and hemodynamic instability (30% vs 13%) (p = 0.02 for combined end point). In conclusion, AAS is frequently confused with acute coronary syndrome, leading to delayed diagnosis and clinically significant bleeding as a consequence of inappropriate treatment with antithrombotic agents.
Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm/diagnosis , Aortic Aneurysm/therapy , Aortic Dissection/diagnosis , Aortic Dissection/therapy , Diagnostic Errors , Emergency Treatment , Acute Disease , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Dissection/pathology , Aortic Aneurysm/pathology , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Male , Medication Errors , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Myocardial Infarction/pathology , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Ontario , Prospective Studies , Referral and Consultation , Thrombolytic Therapy/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has become an alternative to thrombolytic therapy as a reperfusion strategy for ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: The main goal of this study was to determine whether PCI and thrombolytic therapy achieve comparable reperfusion rates, as evidenced by ST-segment resolution. Secondary end points included infarct vessel patency rates before hospital discharge and short- and long-term outcomes. Patients with ischemic chest pain with duration < or =12 hours and no contraindication for thrombolytic therapy were included. RESULTS: Between October 1993 and August 1995, 58 patients were randomly assigned to streptokinase (SK) and 54 patients to primary PCI. Baseline clinical characteristics and infarct location were well balanced in both groups. Median age (interquartile range) was 68 (58, 75) years, 29% were women, and 78% of the patients met at least one criterion for "not low risk" AMI (anterior location, age >70 years old, previous MI, systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg, and/or heart rate >100 bpm). The median time from symptom onset to random assignment was 217 (139, 335) minutes in the PCI group and 210 (145, 334) minutes in the SK group. Median random assignment to balloon time was 82 (55, 100) minutes, and median random assignment to needle time was 15 (10, 26) minutes (P <.0001). TIMI grade 3 flow after primary PCI was obtained in 85% of patients. The proportion of patients with ST-segment resolution > or =50% at 120 minutes was 80% in the PCI group and 50% in the SK group (P =.001). The predischarge angiogram showed the presence of TIMI 3 flow in 96% of patients who received PCI and 65% of patients who received SK (P <.001). A composite of in-hospital death, reinfarction, severe heart failure, stroke, and major bleeding occurred in 15% of patients who received PCI and 21% of patients who received SK (P =.4). At 3 years, freedom from the composite end point of AMI, postdischarge revascularization, and death was 61% in the PCI group and 40% in the SK group (P =.025). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that primary PCI, as compared with SK, is associated with more effective ST-segment resolution, higher patency rates in the infarct vessel at 7 days, and more favorable clinical outcomes at 3 years of follow-up.
