Comparison of the outcome between cervical adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma patients with adjuvant radiotherapy following radical surgery: SGSG/TGCU Intergroup Surveillance.

The efficacy of radiotherapy (RT) for adenocarcinoma (AC) is controversial, although patients with AC of the uterine cervix are treated in a similar manner to those with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant RT for patients with AC compared to those with SCC following radical hysterectomy. A total of 820 patients with stage IB-IIB cervical cancer, who underwent type III radical hysterectomy between 1997 and 2003, were retrospectively examined; the sample included 280 patients with AC and 540 with SCC. A total of 139 patients with AC and 327 with SCC underwent adjuvant treatment. The histological type did not affect the outcome for patients with stage I disease; however, stage II patients with AC exhibited a significantly worse 5-year overall survival (OS) rate compared to those with SCC. Patients with SCC exhibited significantly higher lymph node involvement compared to those with AC in stage IB1; however, there were no differences between stages IB2 and II. Among patients with lymph node involvement, patients with AC exhibited a significantly worse 5-year survival rate compared to those with SCC (46.4 vs. 72.3%, respectively; P=0.0005). Among patients receiving adjuvant RT, those with AC recurred more frequently compared to those with SCC, particularly in the pelvic cavity, including the vaginal stump and/or pelvis (24.6 vs. 10.5%, respectively; P= 0.0022). By contrast, the histological type did not affect the incidence of recurrence in paraaortic lymph nodes and/or distant recurrence. In conclusion, RT may not suffice as an adjuvant treatment for patients with cervical AC following radical hysterectomy.

The importance of precise pT diagnosis for prognostic prediction of uterine cervical cancer--a single institutional report at a Japanese comprehensive cancer hospital.

We previously reported that the majority of Japanese pathologists misunderstand the International Union against Cancer-pT2 criteria for uterine cervical cancer (UCC). We compared the prognosis of originally diagnosed pT2 (ori-pT) UCC cases at our hospital with reclassified pT2 (re-pT) cases to assess the importance of making a correct pT diagnosis. There were 43 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) II (i.e., cT2) and/or ori-pT2 UCC cases who received surgery without neoadjuvant chemotherapy at Shikoku Cancer Center from 1991 to 2003. The cases (seven ori-pT1 and 36 ori-pT2; 43 cN0 with six pN1) were reclassified as 22 re-pT1 and 21 re-pT2. Fifteen of the 23 ori-pT2a cases (65%) were re-pT1 because their vaginal extension had only been intraepithelial. The difference in the 5-year survival rate (5Y-SR) was not significant between the ori-pT1 and ori-pT2 cases using Fisher's exact test (F test): P = 0.236 > 0.05, whereas 5Y-SR of re-pT1 cases was significantly higher than re-pT2, including pN1 cases and excluding them (F test: P = 0.00164 < 0.01 and P = 0.0108 < 0.05, respectively). The 5Y-SR of ori-pT2-re-pT1 (overdiagnosed pT2) was significantly higher that of ori-pT2-re-pT2 (true pT2) including pN1 cases and excluding them (F test: P = 0.00694 < 0.01 and P = 0.0305 < 0.05, respectively). These results indicated that pT2 of UCC could be frequently misdiagnosed at an institutional level, and that misdiagnosed pT2 might impair the evidence-based medicine of UCC. Multi-institutional assessment of the accuracy of pTNM is recommended, because it is not likely that this is an endemic problem to our hospital.

Adenoid basal carcinoma of the uterine cervix: report of two cases with reference to adenosquamous carcinoma.

Adenoid basal carcinoma (ABC) of the uterine cervix is a rare neoplasm with excellent prognosis. Differential diagnosis between ABC and an ABC-like lesion of adenosquamous cell carcinoma (ASC) of the cervix is important due to their contrasting prognosis. Reported herein are two cases of ABC that have been compared with seven ASC exhibiting ABC-like lesions from approximately 2600 resected uterine cervical malignancies diagnosed at Shikoku Cancer Center. The two ABC were incidentally found in the uterine cervix of 69-year-old and 59-year-old Japanese women due to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and to squamous cell carcinoma, respectively. The ABC consisted of infiltrating nests of basaloid cells with low nuclear atypia. The patients remained alive without recurrence for 9 years and 18 months, respectively. An ABC-like lesion was defined as basaloid cell nests simulating ABC, but with some features indicating malignant potential. However, the differential diagnosis was sometimes difficult because two of seven ABC-like lesions were originally diagnosed as ABC. Immunohistochemically, cytokeratin 7 was negative for the basaloid cells of two ABC, but positive for six of six ABC-like lesions of ASC, while cytokeratin 8 was positive for both ABC and ASC. This cytokeratin pattern might provide a good tool for distinguishing between ABC and an ABC-like lesion of ASC when the histological findings are equivocal.