A hierarchy in clusters of cephalopod mRNA editing sites.

RNA editing in the form of substituting adenine with inosine (A-to-I editing) is the most frequent type of RNA editing in many metazoan species. In most species, A-to-I editing sites tend to form clusters and editing at clustered sites depends on editing of the adjacent sites. Although functionally important in some specific cases, A-to-I editing usually is rare. The exception occurs in soft-bodied coleoid cephalopods, where tens of thousands of potentially important A-to-I editing sites have been identified, making coleoids an ideal model for studying of properties and evolution of A-to-I editing sites. Here, we apply several diverse techniques to demonstrate a strong tendency of coleoid RNA editing sites to cluster along the transcript. We show that clustering of editing sites and correlated editing substantially contribute to the transcriptome diversity that arises due to extensive RNA editing. Moreover, we identify three distinct types of editing site clusters, varying in size, and describe RNA structural features and mechanisms likely underlying formation of these clusters. In particular, these observations may explain sequence conservation at large distances around editing sites and the observed dependency of editing on mutations in the vicinity of editing sites.

Ribosomal leaky scanning through a translated uORF requires eIF4G2.

eIF4G2 (DAP5 or Nat1) is a homologue of the canonical translation initiation factor eIF4G1 in higher eukaryotes but its function remains poorly understood. Unlike eIF4G1, eIF4G2 does not interact with the cap-binding protein eIF4E and is believed to drive translation under stress when eIF4E activity is impaired. Here, we show that eIF4G2 operates under normal conditions as well and promotes scanning downstream of the eIF4G1-mediated 40S recruitment and cap-proximal scanning. Specifically, eIF4G2 facilitates leaky scanning for a subset of mRNAs. Apparently, eIF4G2 replaces eIF4G1 during scanning of 5' UTR and the necessity for eIF4G2 only arises when eIF4G1 dissociates from the scanning complex. In particular, this event can occur when the leaky scanning complexes interfere with initiating or elongating 80S ribosomes within a translated uORF. This mechanism is therefore crucial for higher eukaryotes which are known to have long 5' UTRs with highly frequent uORFs. We suggest that uORFs are not the only obstacle on the way of scanning complexes towards the main start codon, because certain eIF4G2 mRNA targets lack uORF(s). Thus, higher eukaryotes possess two distinct scanning complexes: the principal one that binds mRNA and initiates scanning, and the accessory one that rescues scanning when the former fails.