Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 68(1): 43-52.e2, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38574876

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Palliative care (PC) benefits patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), however the needs of patients and caregivers and the optimal timing of PC discussions remains unclear. This study reports the analysis of PC consult notes from a larger feasibility trial. The specific aims of this analysis were to i) identify the PC needs of patients with ALS via qualitative analysis and ii) identify characteristics of patients and caregivers that could predict specific PC needs. METHODS: This study was nested within a nonrandomized, prospective study of patients with ALS (and their caregivers) being treated at a multidisciplinary ALS clinic. Exclusion criteria of the main study were age <18 years, inability to complete questionnaires, and prior receipt of PC. All patients were offered a PC consultation (PCC); those who accepted were included in this nested study. Consultation notes were reviewed and thematic and content analyses were conducted. The occurrence of themes across patient and caregiver contextual variables were examined. RESULTS: Thirty-two PCCs were completed between October 2020 and April 2022. Six major themes were identified: PC roles (with subthemes encompassing the spectrum of specialist PC practice including symptom management and advance care planning), engagement with PC, patients' concerns for their caregivers, caregiver-specific concerns, finances, and COVID-19. An average of 12 topics were discussed per PCC (range = 3-22). Discussion of advance care planning, care coordination, and symptom management was common, and these topics were not discussed more frequently in PCCs with patients with lower functional status, more bulbar symptoms, or lower quality of life. Time from diagnosis did not impact topics of discussion. Patients reporting more symptoms of depression more frequently required psychological support, particularly regarding loss of independence, employment, and leisure activities. DISCUSSION: Patients with ALS and their caregivers have a wide range of PC needs. These needs vary irrespective of time from diagnosis, functional status, or quality of life, therefore PCC is recommended for all patients with ALS. PCC should be individualized based on patient and caregiver preferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04257760; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04257760) on February 6, 2020. The first enrollment occurred on October 20, 2020.


Subject(s)
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis , Caregivers , Palliative Care , Qualitative Research , Referral and Consultation , Humans , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/therapy , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Caregivers/psychology , Aged , Prospective Studies , COVID-19 , Adult , Advance Care Planning , Feasibility Studies
2.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 10: 1204816, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37780560

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Many patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) receive palliative care (PC) very late or not at all. The impact of PC on patients with ALS and caregivers has not been quantified. Study goals included (1) measuring the impact of early PC on quality of life and mood of patients/caregivers and (2) describing patient/caregiver satisfaction with PC. Methods: The study was a non-randomized, prospective feasibility study of patients with ALS being treated at The Ottawa Hospital ALS Clinic and their caregivers. Exclusion criteria were age < 18 years, inability to complete questionnaires, and prior receipt of PC. The ALS Specific Quality of Life-Revised (ALSSQOL-R) questionnaire (patients only) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were completed at regular intervals for up to 2 years. Patients accepting a PC consultation completed a post-PC satisfaction survey. Primary outcome measures included ALSSQOL-R and HADS scores compared before and after PC consultation, and between groups receiving and not receiving a PC consultation. Secondary outcome measures included responses on the post-PC satisfaction survey (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). Results: 39 patients with ALS (age 66 ± 10 years, median time from diagnosis = 6 months) and 22 caregivers were enrolled. 32 patients had a PC consultation (30 were virtual). Patients and caregivers agreed with statements that the PC consult was helpful (mean ± SD = 4.54 ± 0.60, range = 3-5) and they would recommend PC to others with ALS (4.59 ± 0.59, range = 3-5). Participants disagreed with statements that the consult would have been better later in disease course (1.87 ± 0.80, range = 1-4) and that it took too much time/energy (1.44 ± 0.85, range = 1-4). Average ALSSQOL-R scores worsened significantly over time. HADS and ALSSQOL-R scores did not significantly differ between groups receiving and not receiving PC. Conclusion: Patients with ALS and their caregivers found virtual PC consultations beneficial irrespective of disease duration or severity. Offering routine PC to all patients with ALS is feasible and should be considered as part of standard care. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04257760, identifier NCT04257760.

3.
Expert Opin Drug Saf ; 21(6): 813-831, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35502632

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Ketamine is an established intervention for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). However, long-term adverse effects with repeated doses remain insufficiently characterized. Although several animal models have shown N-methyl-D-aspartate glutamate receptor antagonists to produce various neuropathological reactions, attention surrounding the risk of brain lesions has been minimal. AREAS COVERED: The current review focuses on potential neuropathological changes associated with ketamine. Search terms included variations of ketamine, Olney lesions, tau hyperphosphorylation, and parvalbumin interneurons. EXPERT OPINION: Daily high-dose ketamine use in substance use disorder (SUD) populations was associated with clear neurotoxic effects, while no studies specifically evaluated effects of ketamine protocols used for TRD. It is difficult to discern effects directly attributable to ketamine due to methodological factors, such as comorbidities and dramatic differences in dose in SUD populations versus infrequent sub-anesthetic doses typically prescribed for TRD. Taken together, animal models and human ketamine SUD populations suggest potential neuropathology with chronic high-dose ketamine exposure exceeding those recommended for adults with TRD. It is unknown whether repeat sub-anesthetic dosing of ketamine in adults with TRD is associated with Olney lesions or other neuropathologies. In the interim, practitioners should be vigilant for this possibility recognizing that the condition itself is associated with neurodegenerative processes.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant , Ketamine , Adult , Animals , Antidepressive Agents/adverse effects , Depression , Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant/drug therapy , Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists/adverse effects , Humans , Ketamine/adverse effects
4.
Expert Opin Drug Saf ; 21(6): 733-743, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35426769

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Hallucinogen persisting perception disorder (HPPD) affects a subset of persons who use hallucinogens and is defined as the repeated experience of hallucinations and other perceptual disturbances as a result of prior intoxications. As select hallucinogens are under development for the treatment of selectmental disorders, there is a need to better characterize this disorder. AREAS COVERED: A scoping review of the literature on HPPD was completed from inception to July 2021. Topics covered in the review herein include treatments for HPPD, prevalence or incidence data on HPPD among different classes of hallucinogens, risk factors for HPPD, and data pertaining to the pathophysiology of HPPD. EXPERT OPINION: Hallucinogen persisting perception disorder appears to be an uncommon yet serious event associated with prior hallucinogen exposure. The renewed interest in psychedelics as potential treatment options for select mental disorders, especially agents with hallucinogenic potential, provides the impetus to characterize HPPD in its frequency, risk and protective factors, key characteristics, as well as other clinical and treatment-related factors.


Subject(s)
Hallucinogens , Perceptual Disorders , Hallucinations/chemically induced , Hallucinations/epidemiology , Hallucinations/prevention & control , Hallucinogens/adverse effects , Humans , Perceptual Disorders/chemically induced , Perceptual Disorders/epidemiology , Prevalence , Risk Factors
5.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 239(7): 2011-2039, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35292831

ABSTRACT

Anhedonia is a common, persistent, and disabling condition. However, available therapeutics primarily focus on the reduction of depressive and negative symptoms rather than amelioration of deficits in positive affect. As such, extant drug treatments remain largely ineffective in treating symptoms of anhedonia. Ketamine is a rapid-acting and novel therapeutic treatment for treatment-resistant depression, which has also been demonstrated to attenuate symptoms of anhedonia. However, the literature on the anti-anhedonic effects of ketamine is limited-especially within independent dimensions of this symptom domain. Herein, this review examined the impact of ketamine treatment on anhedonia and its dimensions on anticipatory, consummatory, and motivation-related reward deficits. Overall, the findings have shown a trend towards symptom reduction and/or improvements in anhedonia and their respective subdomains, in both human and preclinical studies, as well as its potential to provide additional benefit in reducing suicidality and improving quality-of-life. Although further research is required in understanding the long-term efficacy and mechanism, ketamine may provide an effective and rapid-acting therapeutic in an otherwise unmet domain.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant , Ketamine , Anhedonia , Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant/drug therapy , Humans , Ketamine/pharmacology , Ketamine/therapeutic use , Motivation , Reward
6.
Ann Clin Psychiatry ; 33(3): 193-206, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34398735

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Inflammation, motivational anhedonia, and neuropsychiatric disorders are associated with significant functional impairment and are a major public health concern. The objective of this systematic review is to examine the relationship between inflammatory activity and motivational anhedonia in neuropsychiatric disorders. METHODS: Preclinical and clinical studies were qualitatively synthesized and summarized. RESULTS: We found an association between inflammation and neuropsychiatric disorders, and a transdiagnostic association between motivational anhedonia and neuropsychiatric disorders. This review also identified brain regions associated with motivational processes that might have a latent vulnerability to persistent inflammatory activity. Motivational processes might be impacted early in the development of neuropsychiatric disorders, and could lead to a precursory manifestation of motivational anhedonia before (eg, prodromal phase) or early in the clinical course of the disorder. CONCLUSIONS: Although inflammation, motivational anhedonia, and neuro psychiatric disorders are strongly associated, direct evidence of causal interactions are limited. Further research is required to understand the association and mechanical underpinnings, and improve assessment of this construct. The immune system could serve as a novel treatment target to improve symptoms of motivational anhedonia across diverse neuro psychiatric disorders; however, well-designed interventional studies are required to assess this hypothesis.


Subject(s)
Anhedonia , Mental Disorders , Humans , Inflammation , Motivation
7.
JAMA Psychiatry ; 78(10): 1079-1091, 2021 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34319365

ABSTRACT

Importance: Preexisting noncommunicable diseases (eg, diabetes) increase the risk of COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and death. Mood disorders are associated with impaired immune function and social determinants that increase the risk of COVID-19. Determining whether preexisting mood disorders represent a risk of COVID-19 would inform public health priorities. Objective: To assess whether preexisting mood disorders are associated with a higher risk of COVID-19 susceptibility, hospitalization, severe complications, and death. Data Sources: Systematic searches were conducted for studies reporting data on COVID-19 outcomes in populations with and without mood disorders on PubMed/MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, PsycInfo, Embase, Web of Science, Google/Google Scholar, LitCovid, and select reference lists. The search timeline was from database inception to February 1, 2021. Study Selection: Primary research articles that reported quantitative COVID-19 outcome data in persons with mood disorders vs persons without mood disorders of any age, sex, and nationality were selected. Of 1950 articles identified through this search strategy, 21 studies were included in the analysis. Data Extraction and Synthesis: The modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess methodological quality and risk of bias of component studies. Reported adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were pooled with unadjusted ORs calculated from summary data to generate 4 random-effects summary ORs, each corresponding to a primary outcome. Main Outcomes and Measures: The 4 a priori primary outcomes were COVID-19 susceptibility, COVID-19 hospitalization, COVID-19 severe events, and COVID-19 death. The hypothesis was formulated before study search. Outcome measures between individuals with and without mood disorders were compared. Results: This review included 21 studies that involved more than 91 million individuals. Significantly higher odds of COVID-19 hospitalization (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.12-1.53; P = .001; n = 26 554 397) and death (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.34-1.69; P < .001; n = 25 808 660) were found in persons with preexisting mood disorders compared with those without mood disorders. There was no association between mood disorders and COVID-19 susceptibility (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.73-2.19; n = 65 514 469) or severe events (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.87-1.03; n = 83 240). Visual inspection of the composite funnel plot for asymmetry indicated the presence of publication bias; however, the Egger regression intercept test result was not statistically significant. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis examining the association between preexisting mood disorders and COVID-19 outcomes suggest that individuals with preexisting mood disorders are at higher risk of COVID-19 hospitalization and death and should be categorized as an at-risk group on the basis of a preexisting condition.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/mortality , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Mood Disorders/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Causality , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...