ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) at the time of colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis has been proposed as a predictor of long-term survival. The aim of the study was to analyse its usefulness in a homogeneous population with control of the main confounding factors. METHODOLOGY: Observational study of 836 patients operated on for CRC who were divided into two groups: NLR ≤ 3.3 vs NLR > 3.3. To control for confounders, they were matched one-to-one by propensity analysis. A final sample of 526 patients remained for study. RESULTS: The two groups were mismatched in terms of age, comorbidity, tumour stage, rectal location, and neoadjuvant therapy. Once matching was performed, baseline NLR was statistically significantly associated with long-term survival (p < 0.001) and behaved as an independent prognostic factor for survival (p = 0.001; HR: 1,996; 95% CI: 1.32-3.00) when adjusted in a Cox regression model using age (p < 0,001; HR: 1,04; IC95%: 1,02-1,06) and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (p < 0,001; HR: 1,40; IC95%: 1,27-1,55). Neoadjuvant therapy lost its statistical significance (p = 0,137; HR: 1,59; IC95%: 0,86-2,93). CONCLUSIONS: A high baseline NLR (> 3.3) in patients with colorectal cancer at diagnosis represents a poor prognostic factor in terms of survival. Its use in routine practice could intensify therapeutic strategies and follow-up in these patients.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Advanced age is a risk factor for colorectal cancer, and very elderly patients often need to be surgically treated. This study aimed to analyze the outcomes of a cohort of nonagenarian patients operated on for colorectal cancer. METHODS: Observational study conducted on a cohort of 40 nonagenarian patients, who were treated surgically for colorectal cancer between 2000 and 2018 in our institution. Clinical data, ASA score, Charlson Comorbidity Index, Surgical Mortality Probability Model, tumor characteristics, and nature and technical features of the surgical procedure, were recorded. The Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) and survival time after the procedure were recorded as outcome variables. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed in order to define risk factors for postoperative complications and long-term survival. RESULTS: Out of the 40 patients, 13 (32.5%) were men, 27 (67.5%) women, and mean age 91.6 years (SD ± 1.5). In 24 patients (60%), surgery was elective, and in 16 patients (40%), surgery was emergent. Curative surgery with intestinal resection was performed in 34 patients (85%). In 22 patients (55%), intestinal continuity was restored by performing an anastomosis. The median CCI was 22.6 (IRQ 0.0-42.6). Operative mortality was 10% (4 patients). Cumulative survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 70%, 47%, and 29%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, only the need for transfusion remained as an independent prognostic factor for complications (p = 0.021) and TNM tumor stage as a significant predictor of survival (HR 3.0, CI95% 1.3-7.2). CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal cancer surgery is relatively safe in selected nonagenarian patients and may achieve long-term survival.
