Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Arch Esp Urol ; 49(8): 807-12, 1996 Oct.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9065277

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Herein we present the final results of a prospective randomized study comparing two prophylactic treatment modalities for superficial bladder tumors: chemotherapy with mitomycin C and immunotherapy with interferon. METHODS: The study comprised 65 patients. Mitomycin C was utilized in 34 and interferon in 31 patients. RESULTS: The mitomycin C-treated patients had 41% recurrence, 1.7 recurrence/100 patients-month, 17 months mean time to recurrence and 8.8% tumor progression. The patients receiving interferon had 45% recurrence, 2.4 recurrence/100 patients-month, 12 months mean time to recurrence and 22.2% tumor progression rate. No significant differences were observed between the two groups of patients. Treatment was well-tolerated by both groups and the cost:efficacy ratio was higher for the interferon-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Immunoprophylaxis with interferon is as effective, but costs more than chemoprophylaxis with mitomycin C. Both agents have a moderate effect relative to control of recurrence, time to recurrence and tumor progression.


Subject(s)
Interferon-alpha/therapeutic use , Mitomycin/therapeutic use , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Interferon alpha-2 , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Recombinant Proteins
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...