Mucosal Immunity against SARS-CoV-2 in the Respiratory Tract.

The respiratory tract, the first-line defense, is constantly exposed to inhaled allergens, pollutants, and pathogens such as respiratory viruses. Emerging evidence has demonstrated that the coordination of innate and adaptive immune responses in the respiratory tract plays a crucial role in the protection against invading respiratory pathogens. Therefore, a better understanding of mucosal immunity in the airways is critical for the development of novel therapeutics and next-generation vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and other respiratory viruses. Since the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, our knowledge of mucosal immune responses in the airways has expanded. In this review, we describe the latest knowledge regarding the key components of the mucosal immune system in the respiratory tract. In addition, we summarize the host immune responses in the upper and lower airways following SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination, and discuss the impact of allergic airway inflammation on mucosal immune responses against SARS-CoV-2.

Differential Correlations among Allergy Tests According to Indoor Allergens in Allergic Rhinitis.

OBJECTIVES: Several allergy tests are used for the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis; however, few studies have reported a direct comparison of the skin prick test (SPT), multiple allergen simultaneous test (MAST), and ImmunoCAP according to specific allergens. This study aimed to evaluate the correlations between each test and allergic rhinitis symptoms and to evaluate the correlations of the MAST and ImmunoCAP with the SPT for representative indoor allergens in Korea. METHODS: Electronic medical charts were retrospectively reviewed, and 698 patients with allergic rhinitis who had performed SPT, MAST, and ImmunoCAP were enrolled. Correlations between each allergy test for 4 representative indoor allergens and the symptoms of allergic rhinitis were analyzed. Agreements of the MAST and ImmunoCAP with the SPT were compared according to each allergen. RESULTS: The SPT showed higher correlations with allergic rhinitis symptoms for 4 indoor allergens (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Dermatophagoides farinae, cat, and dog allergens) than the MAST or ImmunoCAP. In comparison between the MAST and SPT, the least correlation was observed for the dog allergen, whereas between the ImmunoCAP and SPT, the least correlation was observed for the cat allergen. The correlation between the ImmunoCAP and SPT was higher than that between the MAST and SPT for the dog allergen, whereas no significant differences were noted for other allergens. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the SPT showed a higher correlation with allergic rhinitis symptoms than the MAST or ImmunoCAP for 4 indoor allergens. ImmunoCAP showed similar reactivity to MAST; however, it showed better positivity with dog allergen in patients who were reactive to the allergen in the SPT. Care should be taken while evaluating dog allergen sensitization using the MAST.

Association between obesity and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a national population-based study.

OBJECTIVES: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of data from the nationwide Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey to evaluate the association between obesity and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) or without nasal polyp (CRSsNP). DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional analysis of health survey data. SETTING: Voluntary survey of representative South Korean populations. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 32 384 individuals aged 19 years or older with available data on CRS and obesity were included. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Diagnosis of CRSwNP or CRSsNP was performed by trained otolaryngologists through sinus endoscopy and surveys of medical history. General and central obesity was diagnosed using body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC), respectively. METHODS: A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to clarify the association between CRSwNP or CRSsNP and obesity according to BMI and WC. Non-obese individuals were recruited as controls. RESULTS: The prevalence of CRSwNP was higher in the general (OR, 1.438; 95% CI, 1.170 to 1.768; p<0.001) and central (OR, 1.251; 95% CI, 1.031 to 1.520; p=0.033) obesity groups than in the control group. Prevalence of CRSsNP was not correlated with obesity. In a logistic regression analysis, olfactory dysfunction (OR, 1.329; 95% CI, 1.137 to 1.553; p<0.001) and purulent discharge (OR, 1.383; 95% CI, 1.193 to 1.603; p<0.001) showed a higher incidence in the central obesity group than in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated an association between CRSwNP and general and central obesity. Further investigations on the mechanism underlying this correlation are necessary for an improved understanding of the pathogenesis of CRSwNP.

Heterogeneity of MYO15A variants significantly determine the feasibility of acoustic stimulation with hearing aid and cochlear implant.

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 3 (DFNB3) mainly leads to congenital and severe-to-profound hearing impairment, which is caused by variants in MYO15A. However, audiological heterogeneity in patients with DFNB3 hinders precision medicine in hearing rehabilitation. Here, we aimed to elucidate the heterogeneity of the auditory phenotypes of MYO15A variants according to the affected domain and the feasibilities for acoustic stimulation. We conducted whole-exome sequencing for 10 unrelated individuals from seven multiplex families with DFNB3; 11 MYO15A variants, including the novel frameshift c.900delT (p.Pro301Argfs*143) and nonsense c.4879G > T (p.Glu1627*) variants, were identified. In seven probands, residual hearing at low frequencies was significantly higher in the groups with one or two N-terminal frameshift variants in trans conformation compared to that in the group without these variants. This is consistent with the 56 individuals from the previously published reports that carried a varying number of N-terminal truncating variants in MYO15A. In addition, patients with missense variants in the second FERM domain had better hearing at low frequencies than patients without these variants. Subsequently, acoustic stimulation provided by devices such as hearing aids or cochlear implants was feasible in patients with one or two N-terminal truncating variants or a second FERM missense variant. In conclusion, N-terminal or second FERM variants in MYO15A allow the practical use of acoustic stimulation through hearing aids or electroacoustic stimulation for aural rehabilitation.