The Relationship between Myopia and Obesity in Adults.

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between myopia and obesity through direct measurements of fat content. METHODS: A cross-sectional study used a stratified, multistage survey, the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2008-2010). Subjects 19 years or older (n = 10,305) were included. Participants were divided into three groups according to refractive status: myopia (spherical equivalent [SE] ≤ -1.0 diopter [D]), emmetropia (-1.0 D < SE ≤ 1.0 D), and hyperopia (SE > 1.0 D). Obesity was investigated with assessment of fat mass and body mass index or waist circumference. Fat mass was measured with whole-body dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Body fat percentage was calculated as (total fat mass / body weight × 100). RESULTS: Higher obesity index was found in individuals with myopic eyes after adjustment for age, sex, education level, income status, physical activity, residence, and serum vitamin D level. The significant difference in total body fat percentages among myopia, emmetropia, and hyperopia was significant in the young age group (19-39 years, p < 0.05) but not in the middle age group (40-64 years) and the old age group (≥65 years). Individuals with a higher percentage of total body fat had greater odds ratios for myopia (fourth quartile of body fat; odds ratio, 1.352; 95% confidence interval, 1.178-1.551). CONCLUSIONS: An association was found between adiposity and myopia in relatively young adults using direct measurements of fat mass.

Measurement of corneal biomechanical properties in diabetes mellitus using the Corvis ST.

We sought to assess changes in corneal biomechanical parameters in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) in comparison with those among healthy controls using Corvis ST (CST). The study group included 209 eyes from healthy control subjects and 33 eyes from diabetic subjects, respectively. Following an ophthalmological examination, measurements with CST were taken. Additionally, hemoglobin A1c and blood glucose values were collected. Results were then compared to those of the control group after adjusting for potential confounding factors, including age-, intraocular pressure (IOP)-, central corneal thickness (CCT)-, spherical equivalent (SE)- and axial length (AL). After adjusting for potential confounding factors, including the age, IOP, CCT, SE, and AL, patients with DM presented significantly lower whole-eye movement (WEM) (ms) values than patients without DM (21.71 ± 0.84 vs. 22.15 ± 0.64 ms; P < .001). There was a significant and negative correlation between WEM (ms) and hemoglobin A1c in DM patients (r = -0.733; P = .001). In univariate and multivariate general linear mixed model (GLMM) analyses, IOP (P < .001 and P < .001, respectively) and the presence of DM (P = .001 and P < .001, respectively) significantly affected WEM (ms). In DM, significant changes in corneal biomechanical properties were detectable. The DM group showed significantly less deformable cornea and sclera than did the normal controls, even after adjusting for age, IOP, CCT, SE, and AL. These findings may cause misinterpretation of IOP measurements in diabetic patients. Therefore, the measurement of corneal biomechanics should be taken into consideration in clinical practice.