Low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols diet versus traditional dietary advice for functional dyspepsia: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Prospective trials evaluating efficacy of specific diet restriction in functional dyspepsia (FD) are scarce. We aimed to assess efficacy of low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAP) diet in FD, compared with traditional dietary advice (TDA). METHODS: In this prospective, single-blind trial, patients with FD (Rome IV) were randomized into low FODMAP diet (LFD) and TDA groups, for 4 weeks (phase I). In phase II (4-12 weeks), LFD group was advised systematic re-introduction of FODMAPs. Symptom severity and quality of life were assessed using "Short-Form Nepean Dyspepsia Index (SF-NDI)." Primary outcome was symptomatic response (symptom score reduction of ≥ 50%), at 4 weeks. Study was registered with CTRI (2019/06/019852). RESULTS: Of 184 patients screened, 105 were randomized to LFD (n = 54) and TDA (n = 51) groups. At 4 weeks, both groups showed significant reduction in SF-NDI symptom scores compared with baseline, with no significant difference in inter-group response rates [LFD: 66.7% (36/54); TDA: 56.9% (29/51); P = 0.32]. On sub-group analysis, patients with postprandial distress syndrome or bloating had significantly better symptomatic response with LFD (P = 0.04). SF-NDI quality of life scores improved significantly in both groups. On multivariate analysis, factors predicting response to LFD were bloating and male gender. Incidences of adverse events (minor) were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with FD, LFD and TDA lead to significant symptomatic and quality of life improvement. Patients with postprandial distress syndrome or bloating respond significantly better to LFD. Therefore, dietary advice for FD should be individualized according to FD subtype.

Low fermentable oligosaccharide, disaccharide, monosaccharide, and polyol diet in patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome: A prospective, randomized trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Low fermentable oligosaccharide, disaccharide, monosaccharide, and polyol (FODMAP) diet improves irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms. Data on long-term "modified" FODMAP diet are emerging. We aimed to assess efficacy and acceptability of short-term "strict" low FODMAP diet (LFD) and long-term "modified" FODMAP diet in patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS (IBS-D). METHODS: This prospective randomized trial included patients with IBS-D (Rome IV) and IBS severity scoring system (IBS-SSS) ≥ 175. In phase I (4 weeks), patients were randomized to strict LFD and traditional dietary advice (TDA) groups. From 4 to 16 weeks, LFD group was advised systematic reintroduction of FODMAPs ("modified" FODMAP diet). Response was defined as > 50-point reduction in IBS-SSS. RESULTS: Of the total 166 patients with IBS-D screened, 101 (mean age 41.9 ± 17.1 years, 58% male) were randomized to LFD (n = 52) and TDA (n = 49) groups. Both at 4 and 16 weeks, total IBS-SSS and IBS quality of life score reduced significantly in both groups, but there was significantly greater reduction in LFD group. By intention-to-treat analysis, responders in LFD group were significantly higher than TDA group (4 weeks-62.7% [32/51] vs 40.8% [20/49], respectively, P = 0.0448; 16 weeks-52.9% [27/51] vs 30.6% [15/49], respectively; P = 0.0274). Compliance to LFD was 93% at 4 weeks and 64% at 16 weeks. Energy, carbohydrate, fat, and fiber intake showed reduction in LFD group at 4 weeks, which improved till 16 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Strict LFD for short-term and "modified" LFD for long term in IBS-D patients is acceptable and leads to significant improvement in symptoms and quality of life.

Prevalence, overlap, and risk factors for Rome IV functional gastrointestinal disorders among college students in northern India.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: There is scarcity of data on prevalence, overlap, and risk factors for functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID) by Rome IV criteria. We evaluated these factors among medical, nursing, and humanities students. METHODS: Rome IV Diagnostic Questionnaire (for all FGIDs), Rome III questionnaire (for irritable bowel syndrome [IBS], functional diarrhea [FDr], and functional constipation [FC]), and questionnaires assessing demography, physical activity, anxiety, and depression were used. RESULTS: A total of 1309 college students were included (medical 425, nursing 390, humanities 494; mean age 20.5 ± 2.1 years; 36.5% males). Prevalence of Rome IV FGIDs was 26.9% (n = 352), significantly higher among females compared with males (32.3% vs. 17.6%; p < 0.001) and significantly higher among medical (34.4%) and nursing students (29.2%) compared with humanities students (18.6%) (p < 0.05). Most common FGIDs were functional dyspepsia (FD) (15.2%), IBS (6.2%), reflux hypersensitivity (3.5%), FDr (2.9%), FC (2.1%), and unspecified functional bowel disorder (2.1%). FGID overlap was present in 9.3%, most common being FD-IBS overlap (4.4%). With Rome III criteria, prevalence of IBS was higher (9.5%), while that of FDr (0.92%) and of FC (1.3%) were lower. On multivariate analysis, independent predictors for FGIDs were female gender, medical student, non-vegetarian diet, junk food, tea/coffee, poor physical activity, anxiety, and insomnia. CONCLUSION: Rome IV FGIDs were present among one-fourth of college students with preponderance among females and medical students. FD, IBS, and reflux hypersensitivity were the most common FGIDs. Rome IV criteria led to a reduction in IBS prevalence and increase in FDr and FC prevalence. Dietary factors, physical activity, anxiety, and insomnia affected FGID prevalence.

Saroglitazar in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and diabetic dyslipidemia: a prospective, observational, real world study.

Saroglitazar, a dual peroxisome proliferator activated receptor α/γ agonist, approved for diabetic dyslipidemia (DD), is potential therapeutic option for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). This prospective, observational, real-world study aimed to determine efficacy and safety of Saroglitazar in patients with NAFLD and DD. We included patients with DD and NAFLD who received Saroglitazar 4 mg once daily for 24 weeks. Blood investigations, liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) (FibroScan) were compared at baseline and 24 weeks. Of 163 patients screened, 107 were included, and 101 completed 24 weeks treatment (mean age 50.4 ± 12.3 years, 78.5% males, mean body mass index 28.8 ± 4.2). After 24 weeks, alanine transaminase (ALT) reduced significantly from 94 (47-122) to 39 (31-49) (p < 0.0001) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (U/L) from 89 (43-114) to 37 (30-47) (p < 0.0001) and LSM (kPa) from 8.4 (7.1-9.3) to 7.5 (6.4-8.4) (p = 0.0261). CAP, glycated hemoglobin and lipid parameters also improved significantly. On linear regression, there was significant association between percent change in ALT and AST with TG reduction after treatment (p = 0.024 and 0.037 respectively).We conclude that Saroglitazar leads to significant improvement in transaminases, LSM, and CAP in NAFLD patients with DD.