Morphological patterns and spatial probability maps of the inferior frontal sulcus in the human brain.

The inferior frontal sulcus (ifs) is a prominent sulcus on the lateral frontal cortex, separating the middle frontal gyrus from the inferior frontal gyrus. The morphology of the ifs can be difficult to distinguish from adjacent sulci, which are often misidentified as continuations of the ifs. The morphological variability of the ifs and its relationship to surrounding sulci were examined in 40 healthy human subjects (i.e., 80 hemispheres). The sulci were identified and labeled on the native cortical surface meshes of individual subjects, permitting proper intra-sulcal assessment. Two main morphological patterns of the ifs were identified across hemispheres: in Type I, the ifs was a single continuous sulcus, and in Type II, the ifs was discontinuous and appeared in two segments. The morphology of the ifs could be further subdivided into nine subtypes based on the presence of anterior and posterior sulcal extensions. The ifs was often observed to connect, either superficially or completely, with surrounding sulci, and seldom appeared as an independent sulcus. The spatial variability of the ifs and its various morphological configurations were quantified in the form of surface spatial probability maps which are made publicly available in the standard fsaverage space. These maps demonstrated that the ifs generally occupied a consistent position across hemispheres and across individuals. The normalized mean sulcal depths associated with the main morphological types were also computed. The present study provides the first detailed description of the ifs as a sulcal complex composed of segments and extensions that can be clearly differentiated from adjacent sulci. These descriptions, together with the spatial probability maps, are critical for the accurate identification of the ifs in anatomical and functional neuroimaging studies investigating the structural characteristics and functional organization of this region in the human brain.

Optimal blocking of the cerebral cortex for cytoarchitectonic examination: a neuronavigation-based approach.

Certain sulci of the human cerebral cortex hold consistent relationships to cytoarchitectonic areas (e.g. the primary motor cortical area 4 and the somatosensory cortical area 3 occupy the anterior and posterior banks of the central sulcus, respectively). Recent research has improved knowledge of the cortical sulci and their variability across individuals. However, other than the so-called primary sulci, understanding of the precise relationships cortical folds hold with many cytoarchitectonic areas remains elusive. To examine these relationships, the cortex must be blocked, sectioned, and histologically processed in a manner that allows the cytoarchitectonic layers to be clearly observed. The optimal strategy to view the cytoarchitecture is to block and section the cortex perpendicular to the sulcal orientation. Most cytoarchitectonic investigations of the cortex, however, have been conducted on specimens cut along a single axis (e.g. the coronal plane), which distorts the appearance of the cytoarchitectonic layers within parts of the cortical ribbon not sectioned optimally. Thus, to understand further the relationships between sulci and cytoarchitectonic areas, the cortex should be sectioned optimally to the sulci of interest. A novel approach for blocking the cortex optimally using structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgical neuronavigation tools is presented here.

Broca's area and the search for anatomical asymmetry: commentary and perspectives.

We present a brief commentary on the field's search for an anatomical asymmetry between Broca's area and its homologue in the non-dominant hemisphere, focusing on a selection of studies, including research from the last decade. We demonstrate that, several years after the influential review of Keller and colleagues from 2009, and despite recent advances in neuroimaging, the existence of a structural asymmetry of Broca's area is still controversial. This is especially the case for studies of the macroanatomy of this region. We point out the inconsistencies in methodology across studies that could account for the discrepancy in results. Investigations of the microstructure of Broca's area show a trend of a leftward asymmetry, but it is still unclear how these results relate to language dominance. We suggest that it may be necessary to combine multiple metrics in a systematic manner to find robust asymmetries and to expand the regional scope of structural investigations. Finally, based on the current state of the literature, we should not rule out the possibility that language dominance may simply not be reflected in local anatomical differences in the brain.