Informed consent is poorly documented when obtaining toxicology testing at delivery in a Massachusetts cohort.

BACKGROUND: Positive toxicology testing at delivery can have enormous consequences for birthing persons and their families, including charges of child abuse or neglect and potential loss of custody for the birthing parent. Therefore state and national guidelines stipulate that, clinicians must obtain consent before toxicology testing at delivery. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed (1) to determine clinician documentation of patient consent for peripartum toxicology testing and (2) to characterize the extent to which patient and hospital characteristics were associated with documented consent. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort of individuals who underwent toxicology testing within 96 hours of delivery between April 2016 and April 2020 at 5 affiliated hospitals across Massachusetts. Medical records were reviewed for documentation of clinician intent to obtain maternal toxicology, testing indication, verbal consent to testing, and child protective services involvement. Hierarchical multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between patient and hospital characteristics and documentation of verbal consent. RESULTS: Among 60,718 deliveries, 1562 maternal toxicology tests were obtained. Verbal consent for testing was documented in 466 cases (29.8%). Documented consent was lacking across most demographic groups. Consent was no more likely to be documented when a report was filed with child protective services and less likely in cases where the birthing parent lost custody before discharge (P=.003). In our multivariable model, consent was least likely to be documented when a maternal complication (abruption, hypertension, preterm labor, preterm premature rupture of membranes, or intrauterine fetal demise) was the indication for testing (adjusted odds ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.76). Verbal consent was twice as likely to be documented in delivery hospitals with established consent policies (adjusted odds ratio, 2.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-4.37). CONCLUSION: Consent for toxicology testing at delivery seemed to be infrequently obtained on the basis of clinician documentation. Provider education and hospital policies for obtaining informed consent are needed to protect the rights of birthing individuals.

Assessing Stigma Towards Substance Use in Pregnancy: A Randomized Study Testing the Impact of Stigmatizing Language and Type of Opioid Use on Attitudes Toward Mothers With Opioid Use Disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent to which colloquial phrases used to describe opioid-exposed mother-infant dyads affects attitudes toward mothers with opioid use disorder (OUD) to assess the role stigmatizing language may have on the care of mothers with OUD. METHODS: We employed a randomized, cross-sectional, case vignette of an opioid-exposed dyad, varying on 2 factors: (1) language to describe newborn ("substance-exposed newborn" vs "addicted baby") and (2) type of maternal opioid use (injection heroin vs nonmedical use of prescription opioids). Participants were recruited using an online survey platform. Substance-related stigma, punitive-blaming, and supportive scales were constructed to assess attitudes. Two-way analyses of variance were conducted to determine mean scale differences by vignette. Posthoc analyses assessed individual item-level differences. RESULTS: Among 1227 respondents, we found a small statistical difference between language and opioid type factors for the supportive scale only (F = 4.31, η2 = .004, P = 0.038), with greater agreement with supportive statements when describing injection heroin use, compared to prescription opioid use, for the "substance-exposed newborn" vignette only. In posthoc analyses, greater than 85% of respondents agreed the mother was "responsible for her opioid use," her "addiction was caused by poor choices," and that she "put her baby in danger." CONCLUSIONS: We found no major differences in attitudes regardless of vignette received. Overall, respondents supported opportunities for maternal recovery yet blamed women, describing mothers as culpable for causing harm to their newborn, showcasing internally conflicting views. These views could contribute to ongoing stigma and avoidance of care among pregnant women with OUD.