Adjuvant therapy and recurrence risk in non-myoinvasive high-grade (stage IC) endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To summarize practice patterns and outcomes among patients with non-myoinvasive high-grade (formerly stage IA, now stage IC) endometrial cancer. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from inception to May 8, 2024 to identify studies reporting on treatment and outcomes of non-myoinvasive high-grade endometrial cancer. We included full-text English reports of patients undergoing adjuvant therapy or surveillance for polyp- or endometrium-confined high-grade endometrial cancer without myometrial invasion containing data on recurrence or survival outcomes. Two reviewers independently screened studies; a third reviewer resolved disagreements. Data were extracted using a standardized form. The primary outcome was recurrence risk. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to summarize binomial proportions and to compare outcomes by adjuvant treatment strategy. RESULTS: A total of 29 studies were included, representing 2770 unique patients. Overall, 49.0 % of patients were managed with observation and 37.9 % with chemotherapy. Most patients (92.5 %) had serous histology. Of 23 studies with data on recurrence, 13.7 % of patients recurred, with a meta-analysis estimate recurrence risk of 11 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 8-15 %). Across 13 studies reporting on recurrence by receipt of chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy, comparative meta-analysis showed similar likelihood of recurrence (8.0 % versus 13.2 %; odds ratio 0.73, 95 % CI: 0.38-1.42). Comparative meta-analyses for (1) adjuvant therapy versus observation and (2) observation or vaginal brachytherapy versus chemotherapy and/or external beam radiation therapy demonstrated no statistically significant difference in recurrence risk. Sensitivity analyses results, including those limiting to studies of patients with serous histology (12 studies) or complete surgical staging (10 studies), were overall consistent with the primary analysis. Survival data was inconsistently reported and not amenable to meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: Among patients with non-myoinvasive high-grade endometrial cancer, recurrence risk was 11 % and use of adjuvant therapy was not associated with reduced recurrence risk. Prospective study of this population is warranted.

Conditional estimates for uterine serous cancer: Tools for survivorship counseling and planning.

OBJECTIVES: Develop conditional survival and risk-assessment estimates for uterine serous carcinoma (USC) overall and stratified by stage as tools for annual survivorship counseling and care planning. METHODS: Patients in the National Cancer Data Base diagnosed between 2004 and 2014 with stage I-IV USC were eligible. Individuals missing stage or survival data or with multiple malignancies were excluded. Five-year conditional survival was estimated using the stage-stratified Kaplan-Meier method annually during follow-up. A standardized mortality ratio (SMR) estimated the proportion of observed to expected deaths in the U.S. adjusted for year, age, and race. The relationships between prognostic factors and survival were studied using multivariate Cox modeling at diagnosis and conditioned on surviving 5-years. RESULTS: There were 14,575 participants, including 43% with stage I, 8% with stage II, 29% with stage III, and 20% with stage IV USC. Five-year survival at diagnosis vs. after surviving 5-years was 52% vs. 75% overall, 77% vs. 81% for stage I, 57% vs. 72% for stage II, 40% vs. 66% for stage III, and 17% vs. 60% for stage IV USC, respectively (P < 0.0001). Incremental improvements in 5-year conditional survival and reductions in SMR tracked with annual follow-up and higher stage. The adjusted risk of death at diagnosis vs. after surviving 5-years was 1.15 vs. 1.40 per 5-year increase of age, 1.26 vs. 1.68 for Medicaid insurance, 3.92 vs. 2.48 for stage III disease, and 6.65 vs. 2.79 for stage IV disease, respectively (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In USC, the evolution of conditional survival permits annual reassessments of prognosis to tailor survivorship counseling and care planning.

Quality improvement initiative to improve inpatient outcomes for Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: To improve Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS) inpatient outcomes through a comprehensive quality improvement (QI) program. DESIGN: Inclusion criteria were opioid-exposed infants ≥36 weeks. QI methodology including stakeholder interviews and plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles were utilized. We compared pre- and post-intervention NAS outcomes after a QI initiative that included: A non-pharmacologic care bundle, function-based assessments consisting of symptom prioritization and then the "Eat, Sleep, Console" (ESC) Tool; and a switch to methadone for pharmacologic treatment. RESULTS: Pharmacologic treatment decreased from 87.1 to 40.0%; adjunctive agent use from 33.6 to 2.4%; hospitalization length from a mean 17.4 to 11.3 days, and opioid treatment days from 16.2 to 12.7 (p < 0.001 for all). Total hospital charges decreased from $31,825 to $20,668 per infant. Parental presence increased from 55.6 to 75.8% (p < 0.0001). No adverse events were noted. CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive QI program focused on non-pharmacologic care, function-based assessments, and methadone resulted in significant sustained improvements in NAS outcomes. These findings have important implications for establishing potentially better practices for opioid-exposed newborns.

Proteinuria causes dysfunctional autophagy in the proximal tubule.

Proteinuria is a major risk factor for chronic kidney disease progression. Furthermore, exposure of proximal tubular epithelial cells to excess albumin promotes tubular atrophy and fibrosis, key predictors of progressive organ dysfunction. However, the link between proteinuria and tubular damage is unclear. We propose that pathological albumin exposure impairs proximal tubular autophagy, an essential process for recycling damaged organelles and toxic intracellular macromolecules. In both mouse primary proximal tubule and immortalized human kidney cells, albumin exposure decreased the number of autophagosomes, visualized by the autophagosome-specific fluorescent markers monodansylcadaverine and GFP-LC3, respectively. Similarly, renal cortical tissue harvested from proteinuric mice contained reduced numbers of autophagosomes on electron micrographs, and immunoblots showed reduced steady-state LC3-II content. Albumin exposure decreased autophagic flux in vitro in a concentration-dependent manner as assessed by LC3-II accumulation rate in the presence of bafilomycin, an H+-ATPase inhibitor that prevents lysosomal LC3-II degradation. In addition, albumin treatment significantly increased the half-life of radiolabeled long-lived proteins, indicating that the primary mechanism of degradation, autophagy, is dysfunctional. In vitro, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) activation, a potent autophagy inhibitor, suppressed autophagy as a result of intracellular amino acid accumulation from lysosomal albumin degradation. mTOR activation was demonstrated by the increased phosphorylation of its downstream target, S6K, with free amino acid or albumin exposure. We propose that excess albumin uptake and degradation inhibit proximal tubule autophagy via an mTOR-mediated mechanism and contribute to progressive tubular injury.

Renal Interstitial Fibrosis: An Imperfect Predictor of Kidney Disease Progression in Some Patient Cohorts.

BACKGROUND: The extent of interstitial fibrosis on kidney biopsy is regarded as a prognostic indicator and guide to treatment. Patients with extensive fibrosis are assigned to supportive treatments with the expectation that they have advanced beyond the point at which immunosuppressive or other disease-modifying therapies would be of benefit. Our study highlights some of the limitations of using interstitial fibrosis to predict who will develop end-stage renal disease (ESRD). METHODS: Analysis of 434 consecutive renal biopsies performed between 2001 and 2012 at a single center. We assessed the influence of various clinical factors along with fibrosis as predictors of ESRD and dialysis-free survival in various patient groups. RESULTS: Interstitial fibrosis performed well overall as a predictor of progression to dialysis. On average, patients with >50% fibrosis progressed more rapidly than those with either 25-49 or 0-24% fibrosis with a median time to dialysis of 1.2, 6.5 and >10 years, respectively. In contrast, interstitial fibrosis was of less value as a predictor of disease progression in a subset of cases that included patients over the age of 70 and those with diabetic nephropathy on biopsy. Surprisingly, 13.9% of patients with normal renal function had 25-49% fibrosis and 5% had more than 50% fibrosis on biopsy, and 5 years after undergoing biopsy 21% of patients with >50% fibrosis still remained dialysis free. CONCLUSION: Renal fibrosis is an imperfect prognostic indicator for the development of ESRD and caution should be exercised in applying it too rigidly, especially in elderly or diabetic patients.