ABSTRACT
Introduction: Odontogenic foci may result to generalized infections spreading the bacteria through contiguous anatomic cavities or hematogenous spread. The most reported secondary infections caused by oral pathogens are intracranial abscesses. Although, few reports in the literature describe the bacterial spread to extracranial locations. Case description: We describe the case of a 52-year-old male Caucasian patient who was admitted to our hospital suffering from severe sepsis caused by a submandibular abscess. Eggerthia catenaformis was detected in blood and abscess material (confirmed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry). The patient subsequently developed a perihepatic abscess and colon perforation, and was stabilized after several surgical interventions. He remained hospitalized for 66 days receiving intravenous antibiotics. Five months later, jaw osteonecrosis with Actinomyces contamination was detected in the left mandible, which also had to be treated surgically. Three years after the last surgery, no signs of recurrence have been detected. Discussion: Oral and maxillofacial surgeons should understand the characteristics of systemic infections, in which the potentially causal intraoral odontogenic foci often lack acute symptoms. If other origins of infection are not detected, elimination of the potentially causal odontogenic foci should be performed. However, the decision making criteria to eliminate suspected causal teeth is needed to be elucidated through more studies.
ABSTRACT
Customized implants have simplified surgical procedures and have improved patient outcome in craniomaxillofacial surgery. Traditionally, patient-specific data is gathered by conventional computed tomography (CT). However, cone-beam CT (CBCT) can generate a 3D reconstruction of the area of interest with a lower dose of radiation at reduced cost. In this study, we investigated the feasibility of using CBCT data to design and generate customized implants for patients requiring craniomaxillofacial reconstruction. We used CBCT to generate 62 implants for 51 consecutive patients admitted to our department between January 2015 and December 2017. The indications for reconstruction and types of reconstruction were very variable. In all cases, the implants were well fitted and no implant-related complications were detected. Pre-surgical planning was faster and more efficient as we did not have to consult a radiologist. Although CBCT data is more difficult to process than conventional CT data for the implant provider, the clinical advantages are pronounced and we now use CBCT as standard in our department. In conclusion, we have shown that using CBCT to design and manufacture customized implants for reconstruction of the craniomaxillofacial area is feasible and recommend this approach to other departments.
