ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether the INTERMED, a generic instrument for assessing biopsychosocial case complexity and direct care, identifies organ transplant patients at risk of unfavourable post-transplant development by comparing it to the Transplant Evaluation Rating Scale (TERS), the established measure for pretransplant psychosocial evaluation. METHOD: One hundred nineteen kidney, liver, and heart transplant candidates were evaluated using the INTERMED, TERS, SF-36, EuroQol, Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and Hospital Anxiety & Depression Scale (HADS). RESULTS: We found significant relationships between the INTERMED and the TERS scores. The INTERMED highly correlated with the HADS,MADRS, and mental and physical health scores of the SF-36 Health Survey. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate the validity and usefulness of the INTERMED instrument for pretransplant evaluation. Furthermore, our findings demonstrate the different qualities of INTERMED and TERS in clinical practice. The advantages of the psychiatric focus of the TERS and the biopsychosocial perspective of the INTERMED are discussed in the context of current literature on integrated care.
Subject(s)
Health Services Needs and Demand , Heart Transplantation/psychology , Interview, Psychological , Kidney Transplantation/psychology , Liver Transplantation/psychology , Personality Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/psychology , Preoperative Care/psychology , Psychophysiologic Disorders/diagnosis , Psychophysiologic Disorders/psychology , Sick Role , Somatoform Disorders/diagnosis , Somatoform Disorders/psychology , Activities of Daily Living/psychology , Adaptation, Psychological , Adult , Comorbidity , Cooperative Behavior , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Disability Evaluation , Europe , Female , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Male , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/psychology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Middle Aged , Patient Care Team , Prognosis , Psychometrics/statistics & numerical data , Psychophysiologic Disorders/therapy , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Factors , Somatoform Disorders/therapyABSTRACT
The high incidence of cardiovascular complications in patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) is partly explained by more aggressive atherosclerosis, i.e. increased incidence and severity of lesions with higher tendency to calcification. The pathogenesis of this accelerated atherosclerosis, however, is not completely understood. Among other risk factors, chronic micro-inflammation may be involved. Activation of cells and adhesion molecules in atherosclerosis is governed by CD40-CD154 (CD40 ligand) interaction. Therefore, we investigated the expression and distribution of CD40-CD154 in different coronary atherosclerotic lesions of CRF patients and non-renal control patients. Coronary plaques of 57 patients with and without CRF were categorized according to the Stary classification and analysed for in situ protein expression of CD40, CD154 and CRP using immunohistochemistry and a semiquantitative scoring system. The nature, number and distribution of infiltrating cells was analysed and correlated to the types of coronary lesions and in particular to the presence of calcification. CD40 was over expressed in media myocytes of coronary plaques of both uremic and control patients. Inside the plaques, CD40 was expressed on endothelial cells, T lymphocytes, macrophages, fibroblasts, and smooth muscle cells. CD154 expression was seen on T cells in areas densely infiltrated by CD40 positive macrophages. In uremic and control patients higher in situ expression of CD40, CD154 and CRP was seen in calcified compared to non-calcified lesions. Inside the plaques, there were significant differences in the expression pattern of CD40 and CD154 between uremic and control patients. In addition, in uremic patients coronary plaques showed higher CRP protein expression compared to control patients. The data indicate a higher inflammatory status of coronary lesions as well as involvement of the CD40-CD154 signaling cascade in CRF patients, especially in cases of calcified atherosclerotic lesions.
