ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Immunoglobulin G4-related disease is characterized by swelling of various organs throughout the body and nodules/hypertrophic lesions. However, its cause remains unknown. We report a case of immunoglobulin G4-related disease that was diagnosed based on the histopathological findings of prostate biopsy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 72-year-old Japanese man had been treated by a nearby doctor for hypertension, but subsequently developed lower urinary tract symptoms and was prescribed an α1 blocker for 1 year. However, the patient was subsequently referred to our department because his symptoms did not improve. Prostate-specific antigen was 1.258 ng/ml; however, the nodule was palpable in the right lobe on digital rectal examination, and magnetic resonance imaging suggested Prostate Imaging and Reporting and Data System category 3. Therefore, transrectal prostate needle biopsy (12 locations) under ultrasound was performed. Histopathological examination revealed no malignant findings, although infiltration of lymphocytes and plasma cells, and partial fibrosis were observed. No remarkable findings of obstructive phlebitis were observed. Immunoglobulin G4-related disease was suspected, and immunoglobulin and immunoglobulin G4 immunostaining was performed. Immunoglobulin G4 positive plasma cells were observed in a wide range, immunoglobulin G4 positive cells were noted at > 10 per high-power field, and the immunoglobulin G4 positive/immunoglobulin G positive cell ratio was > 40%. Serum immunoglobulin G4 levels were high at 1600 mg/dl. Enhanced abdominal computed tomography findings suggested periaortitis. Additionally, multiple lymphadenopathies were observed around the abdominal aorta. The patient was accordingly diagnosed with immunoglobulin G4-related disease definite, diagnosis group (definite). We proposed steroid treatment for periaortic soft tissue lesions and lower urinary tract symptoms; however, the patient was refused treatment. A computed tomography scan 6 months after diagnosis revealed no changes in the soft tissue lesions around the aorta. Follow-up computed tomography examinations will be performed every 6 months. CONCLUSION: If immunoglobulin G4-related disease is suspected and a highly invasive examination is required for histopathological diagnosis, this can be performed by a relatively minimally invasive prostate biopsy for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms. Further evidence is needed to choose an optimal candidate for prostate biopsy for lower urinary tract symptoms patients with suspicion of immunoglobulin G4-related disease. For patients with lower urinary tract symptoms with immunoglobulin G4-related disease or a history, performing a prostate biopsy may avoid unnecessary treatment. However, if steroid therapy is ineffective, surgical treatment should be considered.
