Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Telemed J E Health ; 23(2): 137-142, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27483137

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Telehealth centers across the country, including our own center, are addressing sustainability and best practice business models. We undertook this survey to explore the business models being used at other established telehealth centers. In the literature on telehealth and sustainability, there is a paucity of comparative studies as to how successful telehealth centers function. METHODS: In this study, we compared the business models of 10 successful telehealth centers. We conducted the study by interviewing key individuals at the centers, either through teleconference or telephone. RESULTS: We found that there are five general approaches to sustaining a telehealth center: grants, telehealth network membership fees, income from providing clinical services, per encounter charges, and operating as a cost center. We also found that most centers use more than one approach. CONCLUSION: We concluded that, although the first four approaches can contribute to the success of a center, telehealth centers are and should remain cost centers for their respective institutions.


Subject(s)
Telemedicine/organization & administration , Fees and Charges/statistics & numerical data , Financing, Organized/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Organizational Case Studies , Societies/statistics & numerical data , Telemedicine/economics , United States
2.
J Trauma ; 69(3): 640-3; discussion 643-4, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20838135

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is a national loss of access to surgeons for emergencies. Contributing factors include reduced numbers of practicing general surgeons, superspecialization, reimbursement issues, emphasis on work and life balance, and medical liability. Regionalizing acute care surgery (ACS), as exists for trauma care, represents a potential solution. The purpose of this study is to assess the financial and resources impact of transferring all nontrauma ACS cases from a community hospital (CH) to a trauma center (TC). METHODS: We performed a case mix and financial analysis of patient records with ACS for a rural CH located near an urban Level I TC. ACS patients were analyzed for diagnosis, insurance status, procedures, and length of stay. We estimated physician reimbursement based on evaluation and management codes and procedural CPT codes. Hospital revenues were based on regional diagnosis-related group rates. All third-party remuneration was set at published Medicare rates; self-pay was set at nil. RESULTS: Nine hundred ninety patients were treated in the CH emergency department with 188 potential surgical diseases. ACS was necessary in 62 cases; 25.4% were uninsured. Extrapolated to 12 months, 248 patients would generate new TC physician revenue of >$155,000 and hospital profits of >$1.5 million. CH savings for call pay and other variable costs are >$100,000. TC operating room volume would only increase by 1%. CONCLUSION: Regionalization of ACS to TCs is a viable option from a business perspective. Access to care is preserved during an approaching crisis in emergency general surgical coverage. The referring hospital is relieved of an unfavorable payer mix and surgeon call problems. The TC receives a new revenue stream with limited impact on resources by absorbing these patients under its fixed costs, saving the CH variable costs.


Subject(s)
Critical Care/organization & administration , Hospitals, Community/organization & administration , Trauma Centers/organization & administration , Traumatology/organization & administration , Costs and Cost Analysis , Critical Care/economics , Diagnosis-Related Groups , Fees, Medical , Financial Audit , Florida , Hospitals, Community/economics , Humans , Insurance, Health , Length of Stay , Medically Uninsured , Trauma Centers/economics , Traumatology/economics
4.
J Healthc Manag ; 48(2): 82-97; discussion 97-8, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12698610

ABSTRACT

In the past several years, healthcare providers have coped with the financial aspects of managed care and the resultant constraints on revenue. In fact, working with decreasing margins of return has become routine for many providers. Beyond straightforward cost cutting, providers must also consider a variety of other operational factors to achieve success. To this end, higher patient satisfaction and improved utilization and efficiency of resources are natural objectives. Ironically, fundamental to the pursuit of better operations management is the fact that the delivery of healthcare services can vary between and among patients, providers, and organizations for many reasons. Unfortunately, such variation may be overlooked or trivialized if the phenomenon is not well understood by healthcare managers. Knowing how variation affects the delivery of services creates opportunities for focused improvement.


Subject(s)
Appointments and Schedules , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Needs Assessment , Systems Theory , Utilization Review/methods , Delivery of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/statistics & numerical data , Models, Statistical , Organizational Case Studies , Probability , Surgicenters/statistics & numerical data , Time Management , United States , Utilization Review/organization & administration , Waiting Lists
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...