Prevalence and clinical significance of superficial abdominal reflex abnormalities in idiopathic scoliosis.

To determine prevalence and significance of abnormal superficial abdominal reflexes (SARs) in idiopathic scoliosis. Study of 73 patients with presumed idiopathic scoliosis referred for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), either as a routine pre-operative assessment (n=42) or because of abnormal symptoms or neurological signs (n=31). All patients were examined prior to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the presence of abnormal SARs was noted. All patients then underwent MRI of the whole spine from the foramen magnum to the sacrum. The presence of Chiari 1 malformation and syrinx was recorded. The study group consisted of 11 males and 62 females with a mean age at time of MRI of 18 years (range 5-51 years) and a mean Cobb angle of 48 degrees (range 10-104 degrees). Abnormality of the SARs was recorded in eight cases (prevalence 11%). An abnormal MRI study was recorded in nine cases (12.3%), all patients having a syrinx and four having in addition, a Chiari 1 malformation. Of the patients with abnormal SARs, only 2 (25%) had an abnormal MRI study; 1 had unilateral absence of the reflexes whereas the other had complete absence of SARs. Of patients referred for MRI as a routine pre-operative assessment, 5 (11.6%) had an abnormal MRI study. In patients with idiopathic scoliosis, abnormality of the SARs was recorded in 11% of cases. Unilateral absence was present in one case only and was associated with the presence of syrinx. Other patterns of abnormality were not a useful indicator of underlying cord abnormality.

Spinal deformity in neurofibromatosis type-1: diagnosis and treatment.

Spinal deformity is the commonest orthopaedic manifestation in neurofibromatosis type-1 and is categorized into dystrophic and non-dystrophic types. Management should be based on a meticulous assessment of the spine with plain radiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to rule out the presence of dysplastic features that will determine prognosis and surgical planning. MRI of the whole spine should also be routinely obtained to reveal undetected intraspinal lesions that could threaten scheduled surgical interventions. Non-dystrophic curvatures can be treated with similar decision-making criteria to those applied in the management of idiopathic scoliosis. However, close observation is necessary due to the possibility of modulation with further growth and due to the increased reported risk of pseudarthrosis after spinal fusion. The relentless progressive nature of dystrophic curves necessitates aggressive operative treatment, which often has a significant toll on the quality of life of affected patients through their early childhood. Bracing of dystrophic curves has been unsuccessful. Combined anterior/posterior spinal arthrodesis including the entire structural component of the deformity is indicated in most cases, particularly in the presence of associated sagittal imbalance. This should be performed using abundant autologous bone graft and segmental posterior instrumentation to minimize the risk of non-union and recurrence of the deformity.

Traumatic lumbosacral dislocation: report of two cases.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study of 2 patients with traumatic lumbosacral dislocation. OBJECTIVES: To discuss the difficulty in making diagnosis and the effect of surgical treatment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Traumatic lumbosacral dislocation is an uncommon injury, which creates diagnostic difficulty and is typically managed by open reduction internal fixation of the lumbosacral spine. METHODS: Medical notes and imaging of the 2 patients were reviewed. RESULTS: Both patients were engaged in high-energy accidents and had concomitant injuries. Patient 1 was initially misdiagnosed as having L5 lytic spondylolisthesis and was treated with a lumbar corset. She developed progressive low back and left leg pain. Eleven months after the accident, a bilateral lumbosacral dislocation with right S1 superior facet fracture, disc rupture, posterior soft tissue disruption, and a resultant Grade 4 L5-S1 traumatic spondylolisthesis was identified. She underwent open reduction, followed by a staged anteroposterior spinal arthrodesis using instrumentation with excellent results. Patient 2 sustained a unilateral L5-S1 facet dislocation without neurologic deficit, which reduced spontaneously. The evaluation demonstrated a grossly disturbed posterior ligamentous complex adjacent to the lumbosacral articulation. A combined anteroposterior spinal fusion with instrumentation was performed with favorable outcome. CONCLUSION: Meticulous clinical examination and careful imaging assessment, including CT and MRI, assist an early diagnosis in cases of lumbosacral dislocation. Open reduction and circumferential bony fusion restore segmental stability and painless function.