Variables used to set PEEP in the lung lavage model are poorly related.

Setting an appropriate positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) value is determined by respiratory mechanics, gas exchange and oxygen transport. As these variables may be optimal at different PEEP values, a unique PEEP value may not exist which satisfies both the demands of minimizing mechanical stress and optimizing oxygen transport. In 15 surfactant-deficient piglets, PEEP was increased progressively. Arterial oxygenation and functional residual capacity (FRC) increased, while specific compliance of the respiratory system decreased. Static compliance increased up to a threshold value of PEEP of 8 cm H2O, after which it decreased. This threshold PEEP did not coincide with the lower inflection point of the inspiratory limb of the pressure-volume (PV) loop. Oxygen transport did not correlate with respiratory mechanics or FRC. In the lavage model, the lower inflection point of the PV curve may reflect opening pressure rather than the pressure required to keep the recruited lung open. Recruitment takes place together with a change in the elastic properties of the already open parts of the lung. No single PEEP level is optimal for both oxygen transport and reduction of mechanical stress.

Oxygenation remains unaffected by increased inspiration-to-expiration ratio but impairs hemodynamics in surfactant-depleted piglets.

OBJECTIVES: Prolongation of inspiratory time is used to reduce lung injury in mechanical ventilation. The aim of this study was to isolate the effects of inspiratory time on airway pressure, gas exchange, and hemodynamics, while ventilatory frequency, tidal volume, and mean airway pressure were kept constant. DESIGN: Randomized experimental trial. SETTING: Experimental laboratory of a University Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care. ANIMALS: Twelve anesthetised piglets. INTERVENTIONS: After lavage the reference setting was pressure-controlled ventilation with a decelerating flow; I:E was 1:1, and PEEP was set to 75% of the inflection point pressure level. The I:E ratios of 1.5:1, 2.3:1, and 4:1 were applied randomly. Under open lung conditions, mean airway pressure was kept constant by reduction of external PEEP. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Gas exchange, airway pressures, hemodynamics, functional residual capacity (SF6 tracer), and intrathoracic fluid volumes (double indicator dilution) were measured. Compared to the I:E of 1:1, PaCO2 was 8% lower, with I:E 2.3:1 and 4:1 (p < or = 0.01) while PaO2 remained unchanged. The decrease in inspiratory airway pressure with increased inspiratory time was due to the response of the pressure-regulated volume-controlled mode to an increased I:E ratio. Stroke index and right ventricular ejection fraction were depressed at higher I:E ratios (SI by 18% at 2.3:1, 20% at 4:1; RVEF by 10% at 2.3:1, 13% at 4:1; p < or = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Under open lung conditions with an increased I:E ratio, oxygenation remained unaffected while hemodynamics were impaired.

Ventilation with constant versus decelerating inspiratory flow in experimentally induced acute respiratory failure.

BACKGROUND: Recognition of the potential for ventilator-associated lung injury has renewed the debate on the importance of the inspiratory flow pattern. The aim of this study was to determine whether a ventilatory pattern with decelerating inspiratory flow, with the major part of the tidal volume delivered early, would increase functional residual capacity at unchanged (or even reduced) inspiratory airway pressures and improve gas exchange at different positive end-expiratory pressure levels. METHODS: Surfactant depletion was induced by repeated bronchoalveolar lavage in 13 anesthetized piglets. Decelerating and constant inspiratory flow ventilation was applied at positive end-expiratory pressure levels of 22, 17, 13, 9, and 4 cm H(2)O. Tidal volume, inspiration-to-expiration ratio, and ventilatory frequency were kept constant. Airway pressures, gas exchange, functional residual capacity (using a wash-in/washout method with sulfurhexafluoride), central hemodynamics, and extravascular lung water (using the thermo-dye-indicator dilution technique) were measured. RESULTS: Decelerating inspiratory flow yielded a lower arterial carbon dioxide tension compared to constant flow, that is, it improved alveolar ventilation. There were no differences between the flow patterns regarding end-inspiratory occlusion airway pressure, end-inspiratory lung volume, static compliance, or arterial oxygen tension. No differences were seen in hemodynamics and oxygen delivery. CONCLUSIONS: The decelerating inspiratory flow pattern increased carbon dioxide elimination, without any reduction of inspiratory airway pressure or apparent improvement in arterial oxygen tension. It remains to be established whether these differences are sufficiently pronounced to justify therapeutic consideration.

Under open lung conditions inverse ratio ventilation causes intrinsic PEEP and hemodynamic impairment.

Inverse ratio ventilation (IRV) is commonly used in clinical practice. Several studies have used IRV in order to recruit collapsed alveoli. In a randomised trial in twelve surfactant depleted piglets, the lungs were ventilated with sufficient positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to prevent end-expiratory collapse, and the effects of increased inspiration-to-expiration (I:E ratio) were evaluated. Pressure regulated ventilation (with I:E of 1:1, constant tidal volume and decelerating inspiratory flow) was used at 30 breaths per minute (bpm). I:E ratios of 1.5:1, 2.3:1 and 4:1 were applied sequentially. When the I:E ratio was increased, external PEEP had to be reduced in order to keep total PEEP constant. Functional residual capacity, airway pressures, gas exchange, extrathermal volume and hemodynamics were measured. With I:E ratios above 2:1 intrinsic PEEP was generated and with concomitant decrease in cardiac index. PaO2 was not affected, but oxygen delivery was reduced. It is concluded that I:E ratios of 2:1, or above, generate increased intrinsic PEEP with compromised hemodynamics.

Different ventilatory approaches to keep the lung open.

OBJECTIVES: To study the ability of different ventilatory approaches to keep the lung open. DESIGN: Different ventilatory patterns were applied in surfactant deficient lungs with PEEP set to achieve pre-lavage PaO2. SETTING: Experimental laboratory of a University Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care. ANIMALS: 15 anaesthetised piglets. INTERVENTIONS: One volume-controlled mode (L-IPPV201:1.5) and two pressure-controlled modes at 20 breaths per minute (bpm) and I:E ratios of 2:1 and 1.5:1 (L-PRVC202:1 and L-PRVC201.5:1), and two pressure-controlled modes at 60 bpm and I:E of 1:1 and 1:1.5 (L-PRVC601:1 and L-PRVC601:1.5) were investigated. The pressure-controlled modes were applied using "Pressure-Regulated Volume-Controlled Ventilation" (PRVC). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Gas exchange, airway pressures, hemodynamics, FRC and intrathoracic fluid volumes were measured. Gas exchange was the same for all modes. FRC was 30% higher with all post-lavage settings. By reducing inspiratory time MPAW decreased from 25 cmH2O by 3 cmH2O with L-PRVC201.5:1 and L-PRVC601:1.5. End-inspiratory airway pressure was 29 cmH2O with L-PRVC201.5:1 and 40 cmH2O with L-IPPV201:1.5, while the other modes displayed intermediate values. End-inspiratory lung volume was 65 ml/kg with L-IPPV201:1.5, but it was reduced to 50 and 49 ml/kg with L-PRVC601:1 and L-PRVC601:1.5. Compliance was 16 and 18 ml/cmH2O with L-PRVC202:1 and L-PRVC201.5:1, while it was lower with L-IPPV201:1.5, L-PRVC601:1 and L-PRVC601:1.5. Oxygen delivery was maintained at pre-lavage level with L-PRVC201.5:1 (657 ml/min.m2), the other modes displayed reduced oxygen delivery compared with pre-lavage. CONCLUSION: Neither the rapid frequency modes nor the low frequency volume-controlled mode kept the surfactant deficient lungs open. Pressure-controlled inverse ratio ventilation (20 bpm) kept the lungs open at reduced end-inspiratory airway pressures and hence reduced risk of barotrauma. Reducing I:E ratio in this latter modality from 2:1 to 1.5:1 further improved oxygen delivery.

A shared computer-based problem-oriented patient record for the primary care team.

1. INTRODUCTION. A computer-based patient record (CPR) system, Swedestar, has been developed for use in primary health care. The principal aim of the system is to support continuous quality improvement through improved information handling, improved decision-making, and improved procedures for quality assurance. The Swedestar system has evolved during a ten-year period beginning in 1984. 2. SYSTEM DESIGN. The design philosophy is based on the following key factors: a shared, problem-oriented patient record; structured data entry based on an extensive controlled vocabulary; advanced search and query functions, where the query language has the most important role; integrated decision support for drug prescribing and care protocols and guidelines; integrated procedures for quality assurance. 3. A SHARED PROBLEM-ORIENTED PATIENT RECORD. The core of the CPR system is the problem-oriented patient record. All problems of one patient, recorded by different members of the care team, are displayed on the problem list. Starting from this list, a problem follow-up can be made, one problem at a time or for several problems simultaneously. Thus, it is possible to get an integrated view, across provider categories, of those problems of one patient that belong together. This shared problem-oriented patient record provides an important basis for the primary care team work. 4. INTEGRATED DECISION SUPPORT. The decision support of the system includes a drug prescribing module and a care protocol module. The drug prescribing module is integrated with the patient records and includes an on-line check of the patient's medication list for potential interactions and data-driven reminders concerning major drug problems. Care protocols have been developed for the most common chronic diseases, such as asthma, diabetes, and hypertension. The patient records can be automatically checked according to the care protocols. 5. PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE. The Swedestar system has been implemented in a primary care area with 30,000 inhabitants. It is being used by all the primary care team members: 15 general practitioners, 25 district nurses, and 10 physiotherapists. Several years of practical experience of the CPR system shows that it has a positive impact on quality of care on four levels: 1) improved clinical follow-up of individual patients; 2) facilitated follow-up of aggregated data such as practice activity analysis, annual reports, and clinical indicators; 3) automated medical audit; and 4) concurrent audit. Within that primary care area, quality of care has improved substantially in several aspects due to the use of the CPR system [1].