Clinical management of COVID-19: Experiences of the COVID-19 epidemic from Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has presented clinicians with an enormous challenge in managing a respiratory virus that is not only capable of causing severe pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome, but also multisystem disease. The extraordinary pace of clinical research, and particularly the surge in adaptive trials of new and repurposed treatments, have provided rapid answers to questions of whether such treatments work, and has resulted in corticosteroids taking centre stage in the management of hospitalised patients requiring oxygen support. Some treatment modalities, such as the role of anticoagulation to prevent and treat potential thromboembolic complications, remain controversial, as does the use of high-level oxygen support, outside of an intensive care unit setting. In this paper, we describe the clinical management of COVID-19 patients admitted to Groote Schuur Hospital, a major tertiary level hospital at the epicentre of South Africa's SARS-CoV-2 epidemic during its first 4 months.

A decade of hepatitis C at the University of Cape Town/Groote Schuur Hospital Liver Clinic, South Africa, in the pre-direct-acting antivirals era.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) in South Africa (SA) is incompletely characterised and understood. Epidemiological and clinical data will better inform our understanding and assist national policy decision-making. Against the background of more than two decades of clinical challenges in HCV management, the advent of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) now makes HCV elimination plausible. OBJECTIVES: To better understand the base from which we come, we elected to review and characterise our HCV experience at Groote Schuur Hospital (GSH), Cape Town, SA, in the pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) management era. METHODS: Patients with chronic HCV infection attending the GSH Liver Clinic from 2002 to 2014 were included in the analysis. Relevant data were extracted from a registry and existing clinical records were accessed. Two brands of Peg-IFN were available, and patients treated with the first-generation add-on protease inhibitor telaprevir were included. RESULTS: A total of 238 patients were included in the analysis (median (interquartile range) 47 (37 - 58) years, 60.5% males). Males were significantly younger than females (43.5 (35 - 52) years v. 55 (42 - 64) years, respectively) (p<0.0001). The majority were white (55.9%) or of mixed ancestry (21.8%), 16.4% were HIV co-infected, 3.7% were hepatitis B virus (HBV) co-infected, and 1 patient (0.4%) was triple-infected with HCV, HBV and HIV. The most likely mode of HCV acquisition was blood or blood product exposure prior to 1992 (32.8%) and injecting drug use (17.6%), while 30.3% of patients had no clear risk factor identifiable. Genotypes (GTs) 1 - 5 were observed, with GT-1 (34.9%) predominating. Of patients who were biopsied (n=90), 30.0% had ≥F3 fibrosis, with 15.6% cirrhotic. With IL28B polymorphisms, the heterozygous CT (23.9%) and CC (15.5%) genotypes were most frequent. Of the patients, 32.6% accessed Peg-IFN/RBV-based therapy, 6.5% (n=5) with add-on telaprevir. GT-1 (35.1%) was most prevalent in the treatment group, followed by GT-3 (26.0%) and GT-5 (18.2%); 10.0% were HIV co-infected. The overall sustained virological response (SVR) rate was 75.3%, with 37.0% of GT-1 patients not achieving SVR. Of the patients treated, 49.4% experienced adverse events, including cytopenias (32.5%) and depression (15.6%), and 23.4% required cell support in the form of erythropoietin and/or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. CONCLUSIONS: HCV patients in the Peg-IFN/RBV management era typified the epidemiology of HCV. GT distribution was pangenotypic, and treatment outcomes were encouraging despite treatment challenges. Patient selection, IL28B and sensible support of cytopenias probably accounted for these favourable outcomes. However, numbers treated were limited, and the DAA era of therapy allows for rapid expansion of therapy with now growing numbers of patients and a changing local epidemiology.

Direct-acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C: The initial experience of the University of Cape Town/Groote Schuur Hospital Liver Clinic, South Africa.

BACKGROUND: An estimated 600 000 South Africans are chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). To date, accurate prevalence data are lacking, but emerging data suggest a significant burden in key populations. Historically, pegylated interferon and ribavirin treatment was challenging, with access limited. The advent of all-oral, short-course direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy has revolutionised the management of HCV, being well tolerated and highly effective, although initial cost was a prohibitive factor. OBJECTIVES: To report our initial 2-year experience with DAA therapy at the University of Cape Town/Groote Schuur Hospital Liver Clinic, South Africa (SA). METHODS: Patients who were viraemic for HCV were offered access to DAA therapy. All relevant demographic, virological, serological and clinical laboratory data were captured in a registry. Liver fibrosis was assessed non-invasively with the FibroScan. DAA regimens were prescribed according to current guidance based on HCV genotype (GT), prior treatment history and degree of fibrosis. On treatment, virological response was recorded and a sustained virological response (SVR) was defined as an undetectable HCV RNA at least 12 weeks after the end of treatment. RESULTS: We report on the first 210 patients treated. Their median (interquartile range (IQR)) age was 52 (42 - 61) years and 65% were male, with men significantly younger than women at 50 (42 - 59) years v. 58 (47 - 67) years, respectively (p=0.001). All GTs were observed, with 1 and 5 most prevalent at 45% and 20%, respectively, and GTs 2, 3 and 4 frequencies of 7%, 11% and 17%, respectively. Extensive subtype diversity for GTs 2 and 4 was present. The median (IQR) HCV viral load was log10 5.9 IU/mL (5.4 - 6.5). A significant proportion of patients (39%) had advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis, with 11% F3 fibrosis and 28% F4. Of those with cirrhosis, 12% were decompensated with Childs-Pugh B or C disease. Of the patients, 19% were HIV co-infected and 2% HBV co-infected. In total, 13% were treatment experienced. The majority of patients were treated with sofosbuvir and ledipasvir (38%), daclatasvir (36%) or velpatasvir (± voxilaprevir, 9%). Less frequent combinations included partitaprevir, ritonavir, ombitasvir ± dasbuvir (11%) and sofosbuvir/ribavirin (5%). The per-protocol SVR was 96% (98% if sofosbuvir/ribavirin is excluded). The majority of treatment failures occurred with GT-4, notably subtype 4r. Mild side-effects were reported in 10% of patients, with none discontinuing therapy. CONCLUSIONS: DAA therapy for HCV in a pan-genotypic group of patients, many with advanced liver disease, was highly effective. Our outcomes correspond with existing trial and real-world data for similar treatment. DAA therapy and access need rapid upscaling in SA, especially targeting key populations at point of care.