Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
2.
Tomography ; 6(2): 56-59, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32548280

ABSTRACT

The National Cancer Institute's Quantitative Imaging Network (QIN) has thrived over the past 12 years with an emphasis on the development of image-based decision support software tools for improving measurements of imaging metrics. An overarching goal has been to develop advanced tools that could be translated into clinical trials to provide for improved prediction of response to therapeutic interventions. This article provides an overview of the successes in development and translation of new algorithms into the clinical workflow by the many research teams of the Quantitative Imaging Network.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Imaging , Neoplasms , Algorithms , Benchmarking , Decision Making , Humans , Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Software
3.
Tomography ; 6(2): 60-64, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32548281

ABSTRACT

The Clinical Trial Design and Development Working Group within the Quantitative Imaging Network focuses on providing support for the development, validation, and harmonization of quantitative imaging (QI) methods and tools for use in cancer clinical trials. In the past 10 years, the Group has been working in several areas to identify challenges and opportunities in clinical trials involving QI and radiation oncology. The Group has been working with Quantitative Imaging Network members and the Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance leadership to develop guidelines for standardizing the reporting of quantitative imaging. As a validation platform, the Group led a multireader study to test a semi-automated positron emission tomography quantification software. Clinical translation of QI tools cannot be possible without a continuing dialogue with clinical users. This article also highlights the outreach activities extended to cooperative groups and other organizations that promote the use of QI tools to support clinical decisions.


Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic , Diagnostic Imaging , Neoplasms , Radiation Oncology , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Humans , Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Neoplasms/therapy , Positron-Emission Tomography , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
4.
Tomography ; 5(1): 1-6, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30854436

ABSTRACT

The Quantitative Imaging Network of the National Cancer Institute is in its 10th year of operation, and research teams within the network are developing and validating clinical decision support software tools to measure or predict the response of cancers to various therapies. As projects progress from development activities to validation of quantitative imaging tools and methods, it is important to evaluate the performance and clinical readiness of the tools before committing them to prospective clinical trials. A variety of tests, including special challenges and tool benchmarking, have been instituted within the network to prepare the quantitative imaging tools for service in clinical trials. This article highlights the benchmarking process and provides a current evaluation of several tools in their transition from development to validation.


Subject(s)
Benchmarking , Decision Support Systems, Clinical/standards , Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Translational Research, Biomedical/standards , Diagnostic Imaging/standards , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Humans , International Cooperation
6.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 102(4): 1219-1235, 2018 11 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29966725

ABSTRACT

Modern radiation therapy is delivered with great precision, in part by relying on high-resolution multidimensional anatomic imaging to define targets in space and time. The development of quantitative imaging (QI) modalities capable of monitoring biologic parameters could provide deeper insight into tumor biology and facilitate more personalized clinical decision-making. The Quantitative Imaging Network (QIN) was established by the National Cancer Institute to advance and validate these QI modalities in the context of oncology clinical trials. In particular, the QIN has significant interest in the application of QI to widen the therapeutic window of radiation therapy. QI modalities have great promise in radiation oncology and will help address significant clinical needs, including finer prognostication, more specific target delineation, reduction of normal tissue toxicity, identification of radioresistant disease, and clearer interpretation of treatment response. Patient-specific QI is being incorporated into radiation treatment design in ways such as dose escalation and adaptive replanning, with the intent of improving outcomes while lessening treatment morbidities. This review discusses the current vision of the QIN, current areas of investigation, and how the QIN hopes to enhance the integration of QI into the practice of radiation oncology.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiation Oncology/methods , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy , Positron-Emission Tomography , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Tumor Hypoxia
7.
Med Phys ; 45(6): 2681-2688, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29633297

ABSTRACT

Fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) and other interventions are rapidly evolving as a class of technologically driven interventional approaches in which many surgical specialties visualize fluorescent molecular tracers or biomarkers through associated cameras or oculars to guide clinical decisions on pathological lesion detection and excision/ablation. The technology has been commercialized for some specific applications, but also presents technical challenges unique to optical imaging that could confound the utility of some interventional procedures where real-time decisions must be made. Accordingly, the AAPM has initiated the publication of this Blue Paper of The Emerging Technology Working Group (TETAWG) and the creation of a Task Group from the Therapy Physics Committee within the Treatment Delivery Subcommittee. In describing the relevant issues, this document outlines the key parameters, stakeholders, impacts, and outcomes of clinical FGS technology and its applications. The presentation is not intended to be conclusive, but rather to inform the field of medical physics and stimulate the discussions needed in the field with respect to a seemingly low-risk imaging technology that has high potential for significant therapeutic impact. This AAPM Task Group is working toward consensus around guidelines and standards for advancing the field safely and effectively.


Subject(s)
Optical Imaging/instrumentation , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Consensus , Curriculum , Health Personnel/education , Humans , Patient Safety/legislation & jurisprudence , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Societies, Medical , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/education , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence
8.
J Med Imaging (Bellingham) ; 5(1): 011001, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28924577

ABSTRACT

This guest editorial introduces the Special Section honoring Dr. Laurence P. Clarke.

9.
Tomography ; 2(4): 239-241, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28083563

ABSTRACT

Precision medicine is a healthcare model that seeks to incorporate a wealth of patient information to identify and classify disease progression and to provide tailored therapeutic solutions for individual patients. Interventions are based on knowledge of molecular and mechanistic causes, pathogenesis and pathology of disease. Individual characteristics of the patients are then used to select appropriate healthcare options. Imaging is playing an increasingly important role in identifying relevant characteristics that help to stratify patients for different interventions. However, lack of standards, limitations in image-processing interoperability, and errors in data collection can limit the applicability of imaging in clinical decision support. Quantitative imaging is the attempt to extract reliable, numerical information from images to eliminate qualitative judgments and errors for providing accurate measures of tumor response to therapy or for predicting future response. This issue of Tomography reports quantitative imaging developments made by several members of the National Cancer Institute Quantitative Imaging Network, a program dedicated to the promotion of quantitative imaging methods for clinical decision support.

10.
Tomography ; 2(4): 242-249, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28798963

ABSTRACT

The Quantitative Imaging Network (QIN) of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) conducts research in development and validation of imaging tools and methods for predicting and evaluating clinical response to cancer therapy. Members of the network are involved in examining various imaging and image assessment parameters through network-wide cooperative projects. To more effectively use the cooperative power of the network in conducting computational challenges in benchmarking of tools and methods and collaborative projects in analytical assessment of imaging technologies, the QIN Challenge Task Force has developed policies and procedures to enhance the value of these activities by developing guidelines and leveraging NCI resources to help their administration and manage dissemination of results. Challenges and Collaborative Projects (CCPs) are further divided into technical and clinical CCPs. As the first NCI network to engage in CCPs, we anticipate a variety of CCPs to be conducted by QIN teams in the coming years. These will be aimed to benchmark advanced software tools for clinical decision support, explore new imaging biomarkers for therapeutic assessment, and establish consensus on a range of methods and protocols in support of the use of quantitative imaging to predict and assess response to cancer therapy.

11.
Transl Oncol ; 7(1): 1-4, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24772201

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this editorial is to provide a brief history of National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute (NCI) workshops as related to quantitative imaging within the oncology setting. The editorial will then focus on the recently supported NCI initiatives, including the Quantitative Imaging Network (QIN) initiative and its organizational structure, including planned research goals and deliverables. The publications in this issue of Translational Oncology come from many of the current members of this QIN research network.

12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20842710

ABSTRACT

As nanotechnologies move closer to use in humans, quantitative imaging methods will play a vital role in answering questions of biodistribution. Accurate knowledge of the location and quantity of in vivo nanoconstructs and carriers is a challenging task, and new methods of quantitative imaging at appropriate resolutions are being developed and tested. Sustaining simultaneous advancement in both imaging development and nanotechnology research requires multidisciplinary research teams conducting experiments with interconnected goals. On an even greater scale, networks of multidisciplinary teams focused on similar issues of imaging and probe development offer opportunities for leveraging resources, as well as providing a forum for sharing ideas and creating consensus on solutions to common challenges. The Network for Translational Research (NTR): Optical Imaging in Multimodal Platforms from the National Cancer Institute is just such a network. Four multidisciplinary centers are accepting the challenges of developing and optimizing multimodal imaging hardware and software along with imaging probe development. These efforts are similar to the efforts that will be required for future studies of in vivo nanoparticle biodistribution. In addition to technology development and optimization, the network is organized to confront the challenges of validation of the imaging hardware and associated imaging agents, similar to the methods needed for validating nanomedicine.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Imaging/methods , Nanoparticles/analysis , Animals , Nanotechnology , Tissue Distribution , Translational Research, Biomedical
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...