Timing mechanisms in the cerebellum: testing predictions of a large-scale computer simulation.

We used large-scale computer simulations of eyelid conditioning to investigate how the cerebellum generates and makes use of temporal information. In the simulations the adaptive timing displayed by conditioned responses is mediated by two factors: (1) different sets of granule cells are active at different times during the conditioned stimulus (CS), and (2) responding is not only amplified at reinforced times but also suppressed at unreinforced times during the CS. These factors predict an unusual pattern of responding after partial removal of the cerebellar cortex that was confirmed using small, electrolytic lesions of cerebellar cortex. These results are consistent with timing mechanisms in the cerebellum that are similar to Pavlov's "inhibition of delay" hypothesis.

Cerebellar function: coordination, learning or timing?

Theories of cerebellar function have largely involved three ideas: movement coordination, motor learning or timing. New evidence indicates these distinctions are not particularly meaningful, as the cerebellum influences movement execution by feedforward use of sensory information via temporally specific learning.

Mechanisms of cerebellar learning suggested by eyelid conditioning.

Classical eyelid conditioning has been used to great advantage in demonstrating that the cerebellum helps to improve movements through experience, and in identifying the underlying mechanisms. Results from recent studies support the hypotheses that learning occurs in both the cerebellar nucleus and cortex, and that these sites make different contributions. Specifically, results indicate that the cerebellar cortex is responsible for temporally specific learning. A combination of experimental and computational studies has been important for arriving at these conclusions, which seem to be applicable to the broad range of movements to which the cerebellum contributes.

Dissociation of analgesic and rewarding effects of endomorphin-1 in rats.

The mu-receptor is the primary mediator of the effects of morphine and the endogenous opiates, endomorphin-1 and endomorphin-2. Here we demonstrate a dissociation of the analgesic and rewarding effects of endomorphin-1 in rats. Tail-flick results revealed that endomorphin-1 produced significant analgesic effects within 10-min after injection. However, it failed to show reward properties in the standard 45- min conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm or in an abbreviated 10-min pairing which paralleled the time frame of the tail-flick findings. Morphine induced both analgesia and reward. Endomorphin-1 therefore is the first mu opiate shown to produce potent analgesia in the absence of reward behavior, and thus may have significant clinical potential.

Tolerance and morphine-induced cross-tolerance are not shown to Tyr-W-MIF-1 analgesia.

Tolerance and cross-tolerance between Tyr-W-MIF-1, a mixed micro-agonist/antagonist, and morphine were examined. Opiate dependence also was examined. Rats were pretreated with Tyr-W-MIF-1, morphine, or saline for 4 days. On day 5, the animals were tested for Tyr-W-MIF-1 analgesia, morphine analgesia, or naloxone-precipitated withdrawal. Tyr-W-MIF-1- and morphine-pretreated animals showed similar levels of dependence. Animals pretreated with Tyr-W-MIF-1 failed to express tolerance to Tyr-W-MIF-1 analgesia but did display cross-tolerance to morphine analgesia. Animals pretreated with morphine displayed tolerance to morphine analgesia but did not express cross-tolerance to Tyr-W-MIF-1 analgesia. Therefore, tolerance and morphine-induced cross-tolerance were not expressed to Tyr-W-MIF-1 analgesia.

Tyr-W-MIF-1-induced conditioned place preference.

Based on the evidence that Tyr-Pro-Trp-Gly NH2 (Tyr-W-MIF-1) produced dose-dependent, mu-opiate agonistic/antagonistic effects, we investigated whether Tyr-W-MIF- exhibited similar properties in the conditioned place preference (CPP) test. To examine the opiate agonistic effects on CPP, rats were conditioned with alternating ICV injections of saline and Tyr-W-MIF-1 (0 or 200 microg). This procedure resulted in Tyr-W-MIF-1-induced CPP. To examine the opiate antagonistic properties of low doses of Tyr-W-MIF-1, morphine-induced CPP was challenged with Tyr-W-MIF-1 (0, 25, 50, or 100 microg). Morphine-induced CPP was not affected by Tyr-W-MIF-1 at these doses. These findings show that in the CPP test Tyr-W-MIF-1 produced opiate agonistic effects at the high dose and was without opiate antagonistic properties at lower doses.

The role of corticosterone in the blockade of tolerance to morphine analgesia by formalin-induced pain in the rat.

We previously reported that morphine fails to produce analgesic tolerance when administered in the presence of formalin-induced pain, which may be related to activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. In the present study, we examined whether suppression of corticosterone secretion during pain prevents the blockade of tolerance to morphine analgesia. Male Long-Evans rats were injected with morphine (20 mg/kg) or saline for 4 consecutive days in the presence or absence of formalin-induced pain. To suppress corticosterone activity, some animals were injected daily with the corticosterone synthesis inhibitor, metyrapone (100 mg/kg), 24 h and 30 min before formalin injections. The analgesic effect of a test dose of morphine (10 mg/kg) was then measured in the tail-flick test 24 h after tolerance induction (i.e. day 5). The presence of pain during tolerance induction prevented the development of analgesic tolerance. Furthermore, inhibition of corticosterone synthesis by metyrapone prevented the blockade of tolerance by pain. These results suggest that the blockade of tolerance to morphine analgesia by formalin-induced pain depends on stress-induced corticosterone increases.

Picrotoxin-induced seizures modified by morphine and opiate antagonists.

The effects of naloxone, Tyr-MIF-1, and MIF-1 on morphine-mediated changes in susceptibility to picrotoxin-induced seizures were studied. Rats were pretreated with naloxone, MIF-1, Tyr-MIF-1, or saline. At 15-min intervals, they received a second pretreatment of morphine or saline and then were tested for seizures following a convulsant dose of picrotoxin. Several parameters of specific categories of seizures were scored. Morphine increased the number of focal seizure episodes, duration of postseizure akinesis, and incidence of generalized clonic seizures. Naloxone tended to block the morphine-mediated changes in susceptibility. Tyr-MIF-1 had effects similar to naloxone on duration of postseizure immobility but tended to potentiate the effects of morphine on focal seizure episodes. The effects of morphine and the opiate antagonists on focal seizure episodes and postseizure duration suggest the general involvement of several types of opiate receptors in these picrotoxin-induced behaviors. However, the observation of antagonistic effects for Tyr-MIF-1 on immobility but agonistic effects for focal seizures suggests that the type of effect exerted by opiate agents may depend upon other neuronal variables.

Picrotoxin-induced behavioral tolerance and altered susceptibility to seizures: effects of naloxone.

The role of opiate mechanisms in the development of tolerance and altered susceptibility to seizures after repeated injections of picrotoxin was investigated. Independent groups of rats were pretreated with naloxone (0.3, 1.0, 3.0, and 10.0 mg/kg) or the saline vehicle and then tested for seizures induced by picrotoxin. The procedure was performed on 3 days at 1-week intervals, for a total of 3 testing days. Latencies to different types of seizures, the duration of postseizure immobility, and the number of focal seizure episodes were scored. In the vehicle-treated group, repeated picrotoxin injections led to an increased susceptibility to myoclonic and focal seizures and to decreased duration of postseizure immobility. Naloxone pretreatment significantly decreased the duration of the postseizure akinetic periods in the 1.0- and 10.0-mg/kg groups across all days, suggesting that endogenous opiates are involved in postseizure immobility and that there are interactions between opiate and picrotoxin mechanisms in some seizure-related behaviors. Naloxone did not alter the development of tolerance or sensitivity, indicating that naloxone-insensitive opiate mechanisms or nonopiate mechanisms may be involved in these processes.