Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Laryngoscope ; 133(11): 2885-2890, 2023 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36866689

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Commonly used endoscopic grading scales, such as the nasal polyp scale, inadequately describe the degree of polyposis found postoperatively in the paranasal sinus cavities. The purpose of this study was to create a novel grading system that more accurately characterizes polyp recurrence in postoperative sinus cavities, the Postoperative Polyp Scale (POPS). METHODS: A modified Delphi method was utilized to establish the POPS using consensus opinion among 13 general otolaryngologists, rhinologists, and allergists. Postoperative endoscopy videos from 50 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps were reviewed by 7 fellowship-trained rhinologists and scored according to the POPS. Videos were rated again 1 month later by the same reviewers, and scores were assessed for test-retest and inter-rater reliability. RESULTS: Overall inter-rater reliability for the first and second reviews of the 52 videos was Kf = 0.49 (95% CI 0.42-0.57) and Kf = 0.50 (95% CI 0.42-0.57) for the POPS. Intra-rater reliability showed near-perfect test-retest reliability for the POPS with Kf = 0.80 (95% CI 0.76-0.84). CONCLUSION: The POPS is an easy-to-use, reliable, and novel objective endoscopic grading scale that more accurately describes polyp recurrence in the postoperative state which will be useful in the future for measuring the efficacy of various medical and surgical interventions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 Laryngoscope, 133:2885-2890, 2023.


Subject(s)
Nasal Polyps , Paranasal Sinuses , Rhinitis , Sinusitis , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Rhinitis/diagnosis , Rhinitis/surgery , Sinusitis/diagnosis , Sinusitis/surgery , Paranasal Sinuses/surgery , Nasal Polyps/diagnosis , Nasal Polyps/surgery , Endoscopy/methods , Chronic Disease
2.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 55(2): 295-300, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36171482

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Low-grade prostate cancer has low mortality rates at 10 years; however, it is unclear if the response is sustained for up to 25 years of follow-up. METHODS: Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, the overall and cancer-specific mortality rates were compared among men ≤ 55 years of age diagnosed with low-grade prostate cancer that either had radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy, or no known treatment. RESULTS: Of the 62,772 men diagnosed with low-grade prostate cancer between 1975 and 2016, about 60%, 20% and 20% of men underwent radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy, and no known treatment, respectively. At a median follow-up of 10 years, almost 2% and 7% of men died of prostate cancer and other causes, respectively. The overall mortality was significantly better in radical prostatectomy group compared to no known treatment group (HR 1.99, CI 1.84-2.15, P value < 0.001), but not between the radiotherapy and no known treatment groups. Moreover, the overall and cancer-specific mortality rates in the radiotherapy group were almost two and three times compared to the radical prostatectomy group, respectively (HR 2.15, CI 2.01-2.29, P value < 0.001 for overall mortality and HR 2.87, CI 2.5-3.29, P value < 0.001 for cancer-specific mortality). CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms low mortality rates in men diagnosed with low-grade prostate cancer for over 25 years' follow-up. While radical prostatectomy improves survival significantly compared to no known treatment, radiotherapy is associated with an increase in overall and cancer-specific mortality, which may be related to long-term toxicities.


Subject(s)
Prostate , Prostatic Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Adult , Follow-Up Studies , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Prostate-Specific Antigen , Prostatectomy/methods
3.
Urol Oncol ; 39(8): 493.e1-493.e7, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33353870

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recent guidelines recommend active management of prostate cancer (CaP), especially high-risk disease, in elderly men. However, descriptive data from a large cohort with extended follow up on the risk of death from CaP in men diagnosed over 70 years of age and its relationship to Gleason score (GS) and serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) level is lacking. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we evaluated the influence of GS and serum PSA levels on the risks of mortality from PC (PCM) and mortality from other causes in localized (LPC) and metastatic (MPC) disease in elderly population. METHODS: Men diagnosed with PC over 70 years of age between 2004 and 2016 were divided into LPC and MPC groups, categorized by age: 70-74, 75-79, 80-84, 85-89, and ≥90 years and stratified by GS <7, 7, and >7, and serum PSA level <4, 4-10, 10-20, 20-50, and >50 ng/mL. Competing risk estimates for PCM and mortality from other causes were generated for both groups. RESULTS: Of the 85,649 men, 85.5 % were LPC at diagnosis. Overall, at a median follow up of 4 years, 15% of the men had died including a third from PC. While <15% of men with GS ≤7 died from PC, the PCM was >30% in men with GS >7 in LPC group, which accounted for almost half of total deaths for age 70-84 years. The GS >7 was also significantly associated with PCM in men with MPC. Furthermore, PCM directly correlated with serum PSA levels, with mortality rates reaching up to 50% and 70% for PSA >50 ng/dl for LPC and MPC, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There is a substantial risk of dying in men diagnosed with LPC over 70 years of age with GS >7 or a serum PSA >20 ng/mL. Furthermore, the risk for death for MPC directly correlated with GS with PCM increasing from 10%-30% for GS ≤7 to >50% for GS >7. The data, in conjunction with other clinical parameters such as comorbidities could be used to counsel elderly men on management options of PC for both localized and metastatic PC.


Subject(s)
Prostatectomy/mortality , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Neoplasm Grading , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Survival Rate
4.
J Robot Surg ; 15(3): 321-333, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33222043

ABSTRACT

Over the last decade, the increased utilization of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) in the surgical treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer has led to an uptrend in intracorporeal urinary diversions (ICUD). However, the operative results comparing ICUD to extracorporeal urinary diversion (ECUD) have varied widely. We performed a meta-analysis to analyze perioperative outcomes and complications of ICUD compared to ECUD following RARC. This study is registered at International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42020164074. A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases in August 2019. A total of six studies comparing ICUD vs ECUD were identified and meta-analysis was conducted on these studies. In addition, a cumulative analysis was also performed on 83 studies that reported perioperative outcomes after RARC and ICUD or ECUD. The Weighed Mean Difference of operative time and blood loss between ICUD and ECUD group was (16; 95% confidence interval - 34 to 66) and (- 86; 95% confidence interval - 124 to - 48), respectively. ICUD and ECUD had comparable early (30-day) and mid-term (30-90-day) complication rate (RR 1.19; 95% confidence interval 0.71-2.0; p = 0.5) and (RR 0.91; 95% confidence interval 0.71-1.15 p = 0.4) respectively. In the 83 studies that were included in the cumulative analysis, the mean operative time for ileal conduit and neobladders by ICUD were 307 and 428 min, respectively, compared to ECUD 428 and 426 min, respectively. ICUD and ECUD have comparable short- and mid-term complication rate. The ICUD group has lower blood loss and lower rate of blood transfusion compared to ECUD.


Subject(s)
Cystectomy/methods , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery , Urinary Diversion/methods , Blood Loss, Surgical/statistics & numerical data , Blood Transfusion/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Treatment Outcome , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology , Urinary Diversion/adverse effects
5.
J Investig Med ; 69(1): 47-51, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33004467

ABSTRACT

Influenza outbreaks occur annually and account for significant morbidity and mortality. The overall burden of influenza infections, in the USA, for the 2017-2018 season, was an estimated 45 million cases, 810 000 hospitalizations and 61 000 deaths. Literature suggests that leukocyte count and differential, particularly lymphopenia and/or monocytosis, can provide diagnostic value for influenza infection. However, studies regarding these findings are limited in the adult population, particularly in the USA. The objective of this study was to determine if lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (L:M)<2 can be used as a screening marker for influenza infection. We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients who presented to University of Florida Health, Jacksonville, a university-affiliated tertiary care center in Jacksonville, Florida, between January 2017 and December 2018, with 'influenza-like' symptoms and who were subsequently admitted to the hospital. Patients were divided into two cohorts, based on whether they had laboratory-confirmed influenza versus another confirmed upper respiratory tract viral infection (influenza-like illness (ILI)). L:M was compared between the two groups and was found to be lower in the influenza group compared with the ILI group (p<0.0001). Results of this study demonstrate that a L:M<2 has significant diagnostic value in the acute phase of influenza and can be used for earlier detection and management of this disease, in order to improve clinical outcomes.


Subject(s)
Influenza, Human/diagnosis , Leukocyte Count , Lymphocytes , Monocytes , Aged , Biomarkers/blood , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Influenza, Human/blood , Influenza, Human/immunology , Lymphocyte Count , Male , Middle Aged , Respiratory Tract Infections/immunology , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
7.
Urol Oncol ; 38(11): 826-834, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32605736

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Studies using apalutamide, enzalutamide, or darolutamide have shown improved metastasis free survival (MFS) rates, leaving clinicians with a dilemma of choosing one over the other, for nonmetastatic castration recurrent prostate cancer (nmCRPC). We performed a network meta-analysis to provide an indirect comparison of oncologic outcomes and adverse events (AEs) of these medications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, and SCOPUS databases, for studies reporting apalutamide, enzalutamide, or darolutamide until January 25, 2020. Results were input into an EndNote library, and data were extracted into a predefined template. Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as radiologic progression or death. Network meta-analysis was done using R and meta-analysis was performed with RevMan v. 5. Surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) value was used to provide rank probabilities. RESULTS: We found 3 studies reporting results for apalutamide, enzalutamide, and darolutamide. MFS was significantly lower in patients receiving darolutamide compared to both apalutamide (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-0.97) and enzalutamide (HR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.54-0.93). MFS was similar for enzalutamide and apalutamide (HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.73-1.28). In PFS, apalutamide showed a slightly higher rate compared to darolutamide (HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.59-0.99). There was no difference in overall survival (OS) between any of the medications. There was no statistically significant difference in AEs profile of the 3 medications. However, darolutamide had the highest SUCRA value and probability of being the most preferred medication based on AEs profile. CONCLUSION: Enzalutamide and apalutamide had similar and higher MFS rate in indirect comparison with darolutamide. In cases where AEs are concerning, darolutamide might be the preferred agent.


Subject(s)
Benzamides/therapeutic use , Nitriles/therapeutic use , Phenylthiohydantoin/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Pyrazoles/therapeutic use , Thiohydantoins/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Network Meta-Analysis , Treatment Outcome
8.
Int J Cancer ; 147(8): 2075-2090, 2020 10 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32285447

ABSTRACT

Deficient intake of micronutrients involved in one-carbon metabolism (eg, choline, methionine, vitamin B12 and folic acid) leads to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development in rodents, but is under-investigated in humans. We investigated the association between one-carbon metabolism-related micronutrient intake and HCC risk in a prospective cohort of 494 860 participants with 16 years of follow-up in the NIH-AARP study. Dietary intakes and supplement use were ascertained at baseline using a food-frequency questionnaire. Total intake (diet plus supplements) of the following one-carbon metabolism-related micronutrients were calculated: folate, methionine and vitamins B2 (riboflavin), B3 (niacin), B6 and B12 . These micronutrients were examined both individually and simultaneously, with adjustment for covariates. Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Over the 16-year follow-up period, 647 incident HCC cases were diagnosed. When examined individually, higher total vitamin B3 intake was associated with a lower HCC risk (HRQ5 vs Q1 = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.42-0.85; Ptrend = .008), and the association remained significant when all six micronutrients were examined simultaneously (HRQ5 vs Q1 = 0.32; 95% CI = 0.18-0.55; Ptrend < .0001). Among participants with >3 years of follow-up, higher total vitamin B3 intake was again associated with lower risk (HRQ5 vs Q1 = 0.37; 95% CI = 0.20-0.68; Ptrend = .001), whereas higher total vitamin B6 intake was associated with higher risk (HRQ5 vs Q1 = 2.04; 95% CI = 1.02-4.07; Ptrend = .04). Restricted cubic spline analyses showed a dose-response inverse association between total vitamin B3 intake and HCC risk, and dose-response positive association between total vitamin B6 intake and HCC risk. The study suggests that higher vitamin B3 intake is associated with lower HCC risk, whereas higher vitamin B6 intake is associated with increased risk.


Subject(s)
Carbon/metabolism , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/etiology , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/metabolism , Eating/physiology , Liver Neoplasms/etiology , Liver Neoplasms/metabolism , Micronutrients/administration & dosage , Diet/methods , Dietary Supplements , Female , Folic Acid/administration & dosage , Humans , Male , Methionine/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Nutritional Status/physiology , Prospective Studies , Riboflavin/administration & dosage , Vitamin B 12/administration & dosage , Vitamin B 6/administration & dosage , Vitamin B Complex/administration & dosage
9.
Am J Clin Oncol ; 43(7): 477-483, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32251121

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Randomized clinical trials have shown combination therapy to be superior in progression-free survival (PFS) rates when compared with sunitinib alone. However, there have been no direct comparisons among the combination strategies making it unclear as to which may be the preferred option. We performed a network meta-analysis of the combination therapy (immune checkpoint inhibitor plus axitinib or bevacizumab) used in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and provided a rank order preference based on PFS, and adverse events (AEs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search on the treatment of mRCC using combination therapy till July 2019 was done. Studies reporting on combination therapies with immune checkpoint inhibitor plus axitinib or bevacizumab for mRCC were selected. Frequentist method was used for rank order generation. RESULTS: A total of 3 studies consisting of 2672 patients were selected. All combination therapies demonstrated improved PFS when compared with sunitinib alone. The rank order for PFS showed combination of pembrolizumab plus axitinib had the highest probability of favorability followed by avelumab plus axitinib and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (surface under the cumulative ranking 0.9, 0.7, and 0.4, respectively). For AEs, pembrolizumab plus axitinib had the least AEs ≥grade 3, followed by avelumab plus axitinib and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (surface under the cumulative ranking 0, 0.5, 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: This network meta-analysis demonstrates that combination of pembrolizumab plus axitinib may be the preferred option based on efficacy and side effect profile compared with avelumab plus axitinib or atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. However, all the 3 combination strategies were superior to sunitinib alone in improving PFS in patients with mRCC.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Axitinib/administration & dosage , Bevacizumab/administration & dosage , Humans , Network Meta-Analysis , Sunitinib/administration & dosage
10.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 52(6): 999-1008, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32065331

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prostatic urethral lift (PUL), is a relatively new minimally invasive procedure for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).This article is a systematic review and meta-analysis of all the articles published including follow-up of at least 24 months to analyze sustainability of results. METHODS: We performed a critical review in according to the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. From a total 768 published articles that matched our search terms, 5 studies with minimum follow-up of 24 months were selected for comparison and data analyzed in terms of baseline characteristics, functional, and sexual health outcomes. RESULTS: Included in the analyses are five studies with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. A total of 386 patients underwent PUL and 322 patients (83.4%) are available for follow-up at 24 months. The randomized studies are grouped as group A and non-randomized studies as group B. At 24 months, the mean reduction in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) from baseline was 9.1 in group A and 10.4 in group B. The mean improvement in peak flow rate (Qmax) was 3.7 mL/s in group A and 3 mL/s in group B, and quality of life (QoL) improved by 2.2 in both groups. CONCLUSION: PUL is a well-tolerated, minimally invasive therapy for BPH that provides favorable and durable symptomatic, sexual health, and functional outcomes up to 24 months. Longer follow-up and randomized studies comparing to current standards are required to further confirm the long-term sustainability of PUL.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Hyperplasia/surgery , Urethra/surgery , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Time Factors , Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...