Ear disease and hearing loss: a descriptive study of Aboriginal children living in metropolitan South Australia.

OBJECTIVE: This article aims to describe the rates of middle ear disease in Aboriginal children living in metropolitan Adelaide. METHODS: Data from the Under 8s Ear Health Program (population-based outreach screening) were analysed to identify rates of ear disease and the referral outcomes for children identified with ear conditions during screening. RESULTS: In total, 1598 children participated in at least one screening between May 2013 and May 2017. Males and females were equally represented; 73.2% had one or more abnormal findings on otoscopy at the first screening visit, 42% had abnormal tympanometry, and 20% registered a "fail" on otoacoustic emission testing. The referral pathway for children with abnormal findings included referrals to their GP, Audiology, and Ear Nose Throat (ENT) Departments. Also, 35% (562/1598) of the children screened required referral either to a GP or Audiology, and 28% of those referred (158/562) or 9.8% (158/1598) of the total number of children screened required further ENT management. CONCLUSIONS: High rates of ear disease and hearing problems in urban Aboriginal children were detected in this study. Existing social, environmental, and clinical interventions need to be evaluated. Closer monitoring including data linkage may assist to better understand the effectiveness, timeliness, and challenges of public health interventions and follow-up clinical services to a population-based screening program. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH: Aboriginal-led population-based outreach programs such as the Under 8s Ear Health Program augmented by seamless integration with education, allied health and tertiary health services should be prioritised for expansion and continued funding.

Monitoring and assessing the quality of care for youth: developing an audit tool using an expert consensus approach.

BACKGROUND: The mental health needs of young people are often inadequately met by health services. Quality improvement approaches provide a framework for measuring, assessing and improving the quality of healthcare. However, a lack of performance standards and measurement tools are an impediment to their implementation. This paper reports on the initial stages of development of a clinical audit tool for assessing the quality of primary healthcare for Australian Indigenous youth aged 12-24 including mental health services provided within primary care. METHODS: Audit items were determined through review of relevant guidelines, expert reference group consensus opinion and specific inclusion criteria. Pilot testing was undertaken at four Indigenous primary healthcare services. A focus group discussion involving five staff from a health service participating in pilot testing explored user experiences of the tool. RESULTS: Audit items comprise key measures of processes and outcomes of care for Indigenous youth, as determined by the expert reference group. Gaps and conflicts in relevant guidelines and a lack of agreed performance indicators necessitated a tool development process that relied heavily on expert reference group advice and audit item inclusion criteria. Pilot testing and user feedback highlighted the importance of feasibility and context-specific considerations in tool development and design. CONCLUSIONS: The youth health audit tool provides a first step in monitoring, assessing and improving the way Indigenous primary healthcare services engage with and respond to the needs of youth. Our approach offers a way forward for further development of quality measures in the absence of clearly articulated standards of care.

Pandemic preparedness - Risk management and infection control for all respiratory infection outbreaks.

BACKGROUND: There has been substantial effort and activity in regards to pandemic planning, preparedness and response, mainly in the realm of public health. However, general practitioners and other primary care providers are important players in the health response to a pandemic. OBJECTIVE: To discuss the importance of general practice preparedness for managing respiratory infection outbreaks and to provide a model for the general practice response. DISCUSSION: Pandemic planning and preparedness in general practice is ultimately a crucial risk management exercise, the cornerstone of which is sound infection control. As planning will be significantly aided by, and should extend to, other respiratory outbreaks, we propose a framework for managing outbreaks of respiratory infections with a focus on planned, practised and habitual infection control measures, and a stepwise response according to the extent and severity of the outbreak.