Women in trauma and orthopaedics: are we losing them at the first hurdle?

INTRODUCTION: Diversity in the healthcare workforce is associated with improved performance and patient-reported outcomes. Gender disparity in Trauma and Orthopaedics (T&O) is well recognised. The aim of this study was to compare factors that influence career choice in T&O between male and female final-year students. Furthermore, the trend of representation of women in T&O over the last decade was also compared with other surgical specialities. METHODS: An online survey of final-year students who attended nationally advertised T&O courses over a 2-year period was conducted. Data from NHS digital was obtained to assess gender diversity in T&O compared with other surgical specialities. RESULTS: A total of 414 students from 13 UK medical schools completed the questionnaire. Compared with male students (34.2%), a significantly higher proportion of women (65.8%) decided against a career in T&O, p<0.001. Factors that dissuaded a significantly higher percentage of women included gender bias, technical aspects of surgery, unsociable hours, on-call commitments, inadequate undergraduate training and interest in another specialty (p<0.05). Motivating factors for choosing a career in T&O were similar between both sexes. T&O was the surgical specialty with the lowest proportion of women at both consultant and trainee level over the last decade. CONCLUSION: T&O remains an unpopular career choice among women. To enhance recruitment of women in T&O, future strategies should be directed toward medical students. Universities, orthopaedic departments and societies must work collaboratively to embed culture change, improve the delivery of the undergraduate curriculum, and facilitate students' exposure to operating theatres and female role models.

Achieving good-quality consent: review of literature, case law and guidance.

BACKGROUND: Informed consent is an integral part of clinical practice. There is widespread agreement amongst health professionals that obtaining procedural consent needs to move away from a unidirectional transfer of information to a process of supporting patients in making informed, self-determined decisions. This review aimed to identify processes and measures that warrant consideration when engaging in consent-based discussions with competent patients undergoing elective procedures. METHODS: Formal written guidance from the General Medical Council and Royal College of Surgeons of England, in addition to peer-reviewed literature and case law, was considered in the formulation of this review. RESULTS: A framework for obtaining consent is presented that is informed by the key tenets of shared decision-making (SDM), a model that advocates the contribution of both the clinician and patient to the decision-making process through emphasis on patient participation, analysis of empirical evidence, and effective information exchange. Moreover, areas of contention are highlighted in which further guidance and research are necessary for improved enhancement of the consent process. CONCLUSION: This SDM-centric framework provides structure, detail and suggestions for achieving meaningful consent.

ANTECEDENTES: El consentimiento informado es una parte integral de la práctica clínica. Existe un acuerdo generalizado entre los profesionales de la salud en que lograr el consentimiento del procedimiento no debe ser una transferencia unidireccional de información, sino un proceso de apoyo a los pacientes en la toma de decisiones informadas y autodeterminadas. Esta revisión tiene como objetivo identificar procesos y medidas que deban ser considerados al hablar sobre el consentimiento con pacientes autosuficientes sometidos a procedimientos quirúrgicos electivos. MÉTODOS: Al planear esta revisión se tuvo en cuenta la recomendación formal por escrito del Consejo Médico General y del Royal College of Surgeons of England, además de la literatura revisada por pares y de la jurisprudencia. RESULTADOS: Se presenta un marco para lograr el consentimiento que se basa en los principios clave de la toma de decisiones compartida (Shared Decision-Making, SDM); un modelo que aboga por la contribución, tanto del médico como del paciente, al proceso de toma de decisiones a través del énfasis en la participación del paciente, el análisis de la evidencia empírica y el intercambio efectivo de información. Además, se destacan áreas de contención en las que se necesitan más recomendaciones y más investigación para mejorar aún más el proceso del consentimiento. CONCLUSIÓN: Este marco centrado en la SDM proporciona estructura, detalles y sugerencias sobre cómo se puede lograr un consentimiento informado satisfactorio.

Variation in duplex peak systolic velocity measurement in a multi-site vascular service.

OBJECTIVE: Duplex US (DUS) is increasingly utilised as a first-line investigation for the assessment of carotid disease. For clinical decision-making, DUS assessment must be accurate and reproducible to ensure reliability. We aimed to investigate the variability in peak systolic velocity (PSV) measurement in a multi-site vascular network. METHODS: DUS measurements of PSV were taken from continuous and pulsatile flow, generated by a high fidelity phantom, by 12 experienced vascular scientists across four hospitals. Participants were blinded to the actual PSV value (50 cm/s). RESULTS: We observed an average error of 13.2% (± 8.3) and 11.6% (± 7.5) in PSV measurements taken from pulsatile and continuous waveforms, respectively. Measurements of PSV using the pulsatile waveform demonstrated statistically significant variation across all hospitals; ((hospital/mean) A 43.9 cm/s, B 61.7 cm/s, C 57.4 cm/s, D 47.7 cm/s, p=0.001). Further analysis demonstrated statistically significant variation in 4 instrumentation-related factors when measuring from a pulsatile waveform (Doppler angle, angle of insonation, velocity range, scale range). CONCLUSION: We observed a significant level of error and variation in PSV measurements across four sites within our vascular network. Variation in instrumentation-related factors may be accountable for this. In light of the centralisation of vascular services, it is increasingly important to unify and implement scanning protocols in order to reduce error and inter-site variability.

Advanced catheter technology: is this the answer to overcoming the long learning curve in complex endovascular procedures.

INTRODUCTION: Advanced endovascular procedures require a high degree of skill with a long learning curve. We aimed to identify differential increases in endovascular skill acquisition in novices using conventional (CC), manually steerable (MSC) and robotic endovascular catheters (RC). MATERIALS/METHODS: 10 novices cannulated all vessels within a CT-reconstructed pulsatile-flow arch phantom in the Simulated Endovascular Suite. Subjects were randomly assigned to conventional/manually-steerable/robotic techniques as the first procedure undertaken. The operators repeated the task weekly for 5 weeks. Quantitative (cannulation times, wire/catheter-tip movements, vessel wall hits) and qualitative metrics (validated rating scale (IC3ST)) were compared. RESULTS: Subjects exhibited statistically significant differences when comparing initial to final performance for total procedure times and catheter-tip movements with all catheter types. Sequential non-parametric comparisons identified learning curve plateau levels at weeks 2 or 3(RCs, MSCs), and at week 4(CCs) for the majority of metrics. There were significantly fewer catheter-tip movements using advanced catheter technology after training (Week 5: CC 74 IQR(59-89) versus MSC 62(44-81); p = 0.028, and RC 33 (28-44); p = 0.012). RCs virtually eliminated wall hits at the arch (CC 29(28-76) versus RC 8(6-9); p = 0.005) and produced significantly higher overall performance scores (p < 0.02). CONCLUSION: Advanced endovascular catheters, although more intricate, do not seem to take longer to master and in some areas offer clear advantages with regards to positional control, at a faster rate. RCs seem to be the most intuitive and advanced skill acquisition occurs with minimal training. Robotic endovascular technology may have a significantly shorter path to proficiency allowing an increased number of trainees to attempt more complex endovascular procedures earlier and with a greater degree of safety.