Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Lancet ; 370(9581): 49-58, 2007 Jul 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17617272

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The protease inhibitor darunavir has been shown to be efficacious in highly treatment-experienced patients with HIV infection, but needs to be assessed in patients with a broader range of treatment experience. We did a randomised, controlled, phase III trial (TITAN) to compare 48-week efficacy and safety of darunavir-ritonavir with that of lopinavir-ritonavir in treatment-experienced, lopinavir-naive patients. METHODS: Patients received optimised background regimen plus non-blinded treatment with darunavir-ritonavir 600/100 mg twice daily or lopinavir-ritonavir 400/100 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority (95% CI lower limit for the difference in treatment response -12% or greater) for HIV RNA of less than 400 copies per mL in plasma at week 48 (per-protocol analysis). TITAN (TMC114-C214) is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00110877. FINDINGS: Of 595 patients randomised and treated, 187 (31%) were protease inhibitor naive; 476 of 582 (82%) were susceptible to four or more protease inhibitors. At week 48, significantly more darunavir-ritonavir than lopinavir-ritonavir patients had HIV RNA of less than 400 copies per mL (77% [220 of 286] vs 68% [199 of 293]; estimated difference 9%, 95% CI 2-16). Fewer virological failures treated with darunavir-ritonavir than with lopinavir-ritonavir developed primary protease inhibitor mutations (21% [n=6] vs 36% [n=20]) and nucleoside analogue-associated mutations (14% [n=4] vs 27% [n=15]). Safety data were generally similar between the groups; grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 80 (27%) darunavir-ritonavir and 89 (30%) lopinavir-ritonavir patients. INTERPRETATION: In lopinavir-naive, treatment-experienced patients, darunavir-ritonavir was non-inferior to lopinavir-ritonavir treatment in terms of our virological endpoint, and should therefore be considered as a treatment option for this population.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Protease Inhibitors/therapeutic use , HIV-1/drug effects , Pyrimidinones/therapeutic use , Ritonavir/therapeutic use , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Adult , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active , Darunavir , Female , HIV Protease Inhibitors/adverse effects , Humans , Lopinavir , Male , Middle Aged , Pyrimidinones/adverse effects , RNA, Viral/blood , Ritonavir/adverse effects , Sulfonamides/adverse effects
2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 43(10): 1337-46, 2006 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17051503

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Improved treatment options are needed for patients infected with multidrug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). The nonpeptidic protease inhibitor tipranavir has demonstrated antiviral activity against many protease inhibitor-resistant HIV-1 isolates. The Randomized Evaluation of Strategic Intervention in multi-drug reSistant patients with Tipranavir (RESIST-1) trial is an ongoing, open-label study comparing the efficacy and safety of ritonavir-boosted tipranavir (TPV/r) with an investigator-selected ritonavir-boosted comparator protease inhibitor (CPI/r) in treatment-experienced, HIV-1-infected patients. METHODS: Six hundred twenty antiretroviral-experienced patients were treated at 125 sites in North America and Australia. Before randomization, all patients underwent genotypic resistance testing, which investigators used to select a CPI/r and an optimized background regimen. Patients were randomized to receive TPV/r or CPI/r and were stratified on the basis of preselected protease inhibitor and enfuvirtide use. Treatment response was defined as a confirmed reduction in the HIV-1 load of > or = 1 log10 less than the baseline level without treatment change at week 24. RESULTS: Mean baseline HIV-1 loads and CD4+ cell counts were 4.74 log10 copies/mL and 164 cells/mm3, respectively. At week 24, a total of 41.5% of patients in the TPV/r arm and 22.3% in the CPI/r arm had a > or = 1-log10 reduction in the HIV-1 load (intent-to-treat population; P<.0001). Mean increases in the CD4+ cell count of 54 and 24 cells/mm3 occurred in the TPV/r and CPI/r groups, respectively. Adverse events were slightly more common in the TPV/r group and included diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. Elevations in alanine and aspartate aminotransferase levels and in cholesterol/triglyceride levels were more frequent in the TPV/r group. CONCLUSIONS: TPV/r demonstrated superior antiviral activity, compared with investigator-selected, ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors, at week 24 in treatment-experienced patients with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 infection.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Protease Inhibitors/pharmacology , HIV-1/drug effects , Pyridines/pharmacology , Pyrones/pharmacology , Ritonavir/pharmacology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , CD4 Lymphocyte Count , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , HIV Infections/immunology , HIV Protease Inhibitors/therapeutic use , HIV-1/physiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pyridines/therapeutic use , Pyrones/therapeutic use , Ritonavir/therapeutic use , Sulfonamides , Viral Load
3.
Arch Dermatol ; 139(2): 178-86, 2003 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12588223

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, dose tolerance, and anti-tumor effects of 9-cis-retinoic acid in the treatment of Kaposi sarcoma (KS) related to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). DESIGN: Phase 2, open-label clinical trial of oral doses of 9-cis-retinoic acid increasing in 40-mg increments every 2 weeks from 60 mg/m(2) per day to a maximum of 140 mg/m( 2) per day. SETTING: Five hospital or health maintenance organization outpatient clinics. PATIENTS: Fifty-seven adult male patients with human immunodeficiency virus and biopsy-proven KS. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Safety was evaluated by adverse events, physical examination, laboratory test abnormalities, treatment-limiting toxic effects, and reasons for early withdrawal. Response (>/=50% improvement) was evaluated by an overall KS response and by the area and height from 6 index lesions selected at baseline. RESULTS: Patients tolerated 60 and 100 mg/m(2) per day. Most patients found 140 mg/m(2) per day intolerable owing to headache. Common treatment-related adverse events were headache, xerosis, rash, alopecia, and hyperlipemia. The patient response rate for the overall KS disease was 19% (11/57), including 1 patient with clinically complete response. The response rate assessed by measuring 6 index lesions during treatment was 39% (22/57). Sixteen responding patients (73%) were refractory to at least 1 previous anti-KS therapy. Patients with CD4( +) counts of 150 cells/ micro L or lower were as likely to respond as patients with counts of higher than 150 cells/ micro L. The median time to response was 8.5 weeks (range, 4.0-21.1 weeks). The median duration of treatment was 15.1 weeks (range, 0.14 to >/=62 weeks). CONCLUSION: 9-cis-retinoic acid capsules have moderate activity and provide durable responses, but substantial toxic effects at higher doses limit its suitability as an anti-KS therapy.


Subject(s)
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/complications , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Maximum Tolerated Dose , Sarcoma, Kaposi/drug therapy , Sarcoma, Kaposi/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Tretinoin/administration & dosage , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/diagnosis , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Alitretinoin , Biopsy, Needle , Capsules , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Risk Assessment , Sarcoma, Kaposi/complications , Sarcoma, Kaposi/mortality , Single-Blind Method , Skin Neoplasms/complications , Skin Neoplasms/mortality , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...