Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
J Asthma ; 59(3): 541-551, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33356678

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Systematic assessment of patients with potential severe asthma is key to identification of treatable traits and optimal management. Assessment of antimicrobial immune function is part of that assessment at many centers although there is little evidence-base on its added value in clinical assessment of this patient group. As part of reviewing our local pathway, we have retrospectively reviewed these tests in 327 consecutive referrals to our severe asthma service, in an evaluation to describe the utility of these tests and allow refinement of the local guideline for patient assessment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Serum immunoglobulin concentrations were in the normal range in most patients though 12 patients had serum IgG < 5.5 g/L and many had suboptimal anti-Haemophilus (127 of 249 patients tested) and anti-Pneumococcal (111 of 239) immune responses. As expected many patients had evidence of sensitization to Aspergillus although specific IgG was not confined to those with evidence of allergic sensitization/allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA). Eighteen of 277 patients tested had serological evidence of Strongyloides infection. Bacteria and/or yeast were cultured from the sputum in 76 out of 110 patients productive of sputum, and the most common microbes cultured were Candida sp. (44 patients), Staphylococcus aureus (21 patients), Haemophilus influenzae (18 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Many patients had evidence of infection, colonization, or sensitization to potential pathogens relevant to asthma. Strongyloides infection was evident in several patients, which may be a major issue when considering the risk of hyper-infection following immunosuppression and supports our local screening strategy.


Subject(s)
Aspergillosis, Allergic Bronchopulmonary , Asthma , Helminths , Animals , Aspergillosis, Allergic Bronchopulmonary/diagnosis , Aspergillus fumigatus , Humans , Immunoglobulin E , Retrospective Studies
2.
Sci Rep ; 9(1): 20216, 2019 12 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31882826

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to establish a simple method for the rapid identification of Mycobacteria species by MALDI-TOF (Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time of Flight Mass spectrometry) using the Bruker MALDI-TOF Biotyper system (Bruker Daltonik, Bremen, Germany). A multicentre, prospective, and single blind study was performed in three European Hospitals, two Spanish and one UK hospital from May to August 2018. The BD BACTEC MGIT (Becton Dickinson, Berks, UK) liquid culture system was used in all three centres for the growth of Mycobacteria. When signal positive, tubes were removed from the analyser and in addition to standard laboratory procedures were subcultured on blood agar plates for MALDI-TOF analysis. Plates were incubated aerobically for 1 to 7 days at 37 °C and inspected every day. Once any growth was visible, it was transferred to the steel target plate, overlaid with 1 µl of neat formic acid and 1 µl HCCA matrix (alpha hydroxyl 4 cinnamic acid), and analysed in a Bruker Biotyper MALDI-TOF. Results given by MALDI-TOF were compared with the reference methods used for identification in the different centres. At two Spanish hospitals, identification by MALDI-TOF was only attempted on presumptive non-tuberculosis mycobacteria (NTM) and the results were initially compared with the results obtained by a commercial reverse hybridisation assay, GenoType CM/AS (Hain Lifescience, Tübingen, Germany). At the UK Hospital, identification of any presumptive mycobacteria was attempted and compared with the results obtained by whole genome sequencing (WGS). Overall in 142/167 (85%) of cases the identifications obtained were concordant; all Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) isolates 43/43 (100%), 57/76 (75%) of the rapid growing nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), and 42/48 (85%) slow growing NTM tested were identified correctly. We report a new, easy, cheap and quick method for isolation and identification of Mycobacterium spp. without the need for additional steps or equipment and this method is in routine used in all three centres.


Subject(s)
Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous/diagnosis , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolation & purification , Nontuberculous Mycobacteria/isolation & purification , Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization/methods , Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/methods , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/statistics & numerical data , Genotype , Hospitals , Humans , Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous/microbiology , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genetics , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/physiology , Nontuberculous Mycobacteria/genetics , Nontuberculous Mycobacteria/physiology , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Single-Blind Method , Spain , Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization/statistics & numerical data , Tuberculosis/microbiology , United Kingdom
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...