Laser-assisted "Scissor" Technique to Facilitate Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection.

BACKGROUND: There has been an increase in utilization of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) to treat aneurysms with chronic dissection. Despite significant progress, TEVAR is hindered by persistent perfusion of the false lumen and aneurysm growth. Various techniques to address false lumen perfusion exist. We preset our experience of laser fenestration with disruption of the dissection flap to facilitate TEVAR and avoid persistent retrograde false lumen perfusion. METHODS: Review a technique to treat patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm complicated by chronic dissection. This is an adjunct to a TEVAR procedure with final goal to treat the aneurysm and avoid retrograde false lumen perfusion. Under IVUS guidance, we performed a Phillips/Spectranetics laser fenestration of the intimal flap followed by a scissoring technique to obliterate the dissection flap and create a distal seal zone. Stent-grafts placed following flap obliteration allow graft expansion and apposition to the entire outer aortic and avoid retrograde perfusion of the false lumen. RESULTS: Two patients underwent TEVAR in conjunction with laser obliteration of the dissection flap, including 1 undergoing primary repair of a chronic Type B dissection with aneurysm, and 1 as a completion second stage elephant trunk procedure. Technical success was achieved in both cases, with successful implantation of the endograft, and freedom from type I and III endoleaks. Absence of false lumen flow, and patency of the visceral vessels was confirmed on completion angiography. True lumen patency and obliteration of the intimal flap were confirmed by IVUS. Early follow up confirms exclusion of the aneurysm, with no evidence of retrograde perfusion of the false lumen. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracic aortic aneurysms in the context of chronic dissections can be successfully treated with TEVAR and laser obliteration of the chronic dissection flap to fully exclude the aneurysm and avoid retrograde false lumen perfusion.

Periprocedural Outcomes of Popliteal vs Upper Extremity Access in the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Artery Occlusive Disease.

PURPOSE: Percutaneous lower extremity revascularization is being performed via upper extremity, pedal, or popliteal access with increasing frequency. This study aimed to compare periprocedural outcomes of popliteal (POA) and upper extremity (UEA) access for the treatment of isolated superficial femoral artery (SFA) occlusive disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study compared the outcomes of patients undergoing primary percutaneous intervention of SFA occlusive disease with POA or UEA using the Vascular Quality Initiative database from December 2010 to June 2019. Our primary endpoint was technical success. Secondary endpoints included factors associated with perioperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 349 patients underwent isolated SFA intervention through the popliteal, radial, or brachial artery. UEA was performed in 188 (53.9%) patients and POA in 161 (46.1%). Technical success with TASC A lesions was 95.8% and with TASC D lesions, 65.0%. POA had a higher proportion of TASC D lesions (24.8% vs 10.6%, p<0.001), and larger (≥7 Fr) sheath size (14.3% vs 2.7%, p<0.001). UEA had a higher proportion of no calcification (27.1% vs 11.2%, p<0.001), and smaller (4-5 Fr) sheath size (46.8% vs 34.8%, p=0.023). There was no difference in technical success between UEA and POA (88.8% vs 84.5%, p=0.230), which was also seen on multivariable analysis (p=0.985). Univariate analysis revealed technical failure was associated with TASC D lesions (45.7% vs 12.9%, p<0.001) and the presence of severe calcifications (39.1% vs 17.5%, p=0.002). Multivariable analysis confirmed technical failure was associated with degree of calcification (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.18 to 4.89; p=0.016) and TASC D lesions (OR, 5.01; 95% CI, 2.45 to 10.24; p<0.001). Postoperative complications were associated with UEA on univariate (p=0.041) and multivariate analysis (OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 0.80 to 5.37; p=0.016). Access site complications were also associated with UEA compared to POA (4.3% vs 0.0%, p=0.027). CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in technical success between UEA and POA when treating isolated SFA occlusive disease, and UEA is associated with a higher complication rate. Technical success is dependent on calcification and TASC II classification. Based on similar technical success rates and low complication rates, POA should be considered as a viable alternative to UEA when planning endovascular interventions.

The Impact of Biochemical Markers on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events and Contralateral Carotid Artery Stenosis Progression Following Carotid Interventions.

BACKGROUD: To determine if elevated preintervention high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels associate with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) or disease progression after carotid revascularization. METHODS: We retrospectively examined patients receiving elective carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) at our institution from 2007 to 2014. All included patients had preintervention hsCRP and BNP levels. Examined outcomes of interest included contralateral carotid disease progression (increased stenosis or need for revascularization) and MACE (composite of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, need for coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous coronary intervention) at 3 years after procedure. The relationship between baseline hsCRP and BNP levels and time to event was examined by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 248 patients were included in the analysis (mean age: 68 ± 10 years), with 14% receiving CAS and 86% CEA. A total of 61 patients (25%) had 1 or more MACE by 3 years. Elevated hsCRP (>3 mg/L) trended toward associating with MACE but failed to reach significance (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.6 [1.0-2.7], P = 0.07). Multivariate analysis found that elevated BNP (>100pg/mL, HR: 2.2 [1.3-3.7], P = 0.002) and diabetes mellitus (HR: 1.9 [1.2-3.2], P = 0.01) predicted MACE. Having elevated preprocedural levels of both hsCRP and BNP significantly increased patients' likelihood of experiencing MACE (HR: 3.4 [1.6-7.1], P = 0.001). About 175 patients received contralateral carotid imaging postprocedure and of those patients, 31 (18%) experienced stenosis progression and/or revascularization within 3 years. However, neither elevated hsCRP (HR: 1.2 [0.6-2.3], P = 0.68) nor BNP (HR: 1.1 [0.5-2.5], P = 0.88) associated with disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: BNP elevation at the time of carotid intervention is associated with MACE in long-term follow-up. hsCRP does not appear to correlate with either disease progression of the contralateral artery or MACE.