Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Anim Reprod Sci ; 227: 106723, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33621845

ABSTRACT

Two experiments were conducted to examine the effect of plasma concentrations of 17ß-estradiol (E2) preceding and progesterone (P4) subsequent to ovulation on proportions of beef cows pregnant following embryo transfer. Timing of ovulation (d 0) among postpartum cows was synchronized and cows that expressed estrus were removed from each study. In Experiment 1, plasma E2 concentration on d 0 was used to classify cows (n = 353) into Low, Medium, and High E2 groups. Pregnancy rate for cows with Low, Medium, or High E2 concentrations were different (P < 0.05). In Experiment 2, there were multiple administrations of PGF2α to evaluate the independent effects of Low or High E2 before ovulation and Low or Normal (no treatment) P4 after ovulation on proportions of cows pregnant. Treatment groups in Experiment 2, therefore, were: Low E2-Low P4 (LL; n = 71), Low E2-Normal P4 (LN; n = 69), High E2-Low P4 (HL; n = 74), and High E2-Normal P4 (HN; n = 73). Concentrations of P4 on d 7 subsequent to ovulation were less (P < 0.05) in cows of the HL compared to HN, and in LL compared to LN groups. Concentrations of E2 on d -2, 0, and change in E2 (d -2 to d 0) had a positive effect (P < 0.008) on pregnancy rates. In summary, relatively greater E2 concentrations preceding ovulation; and relatively greater P4 concentrations subsequent to ovulation combined with lesser E2 concentrations preceding ovulation had a positive effect on proportions of postpartum cows pregnant.


Subject(s)
Cattle/physiology , Dinoprost/pharmacology , Embryo Transfer/veterinary , Estradiol/blood , Ovulation/physiology , Progesterone/pharmacology , Animals , Cattle/blood , Cloprostenol/pharmacology , Dinoprost/administration & dosage , Drug Administration Schedule , Estradiol/administration & dosage , Female , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/pharmacology , Pregnancy , Progesterone/administration & dosage , Progesterone/blood
2.
Cytogenet Genome Res ; 97(3-4): 158-62, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12438706

ABSTRACT

Cytogenetic deletions are almost always associated with phenotypic abnormality and are very rarely transmitted. We have located a hitherto undescribed, familial deletion involving the region 11q14.3-->q21 in five individuals in a three-generation kindred. Four of the deletion carriers show no phenotypic abnormality; the other, who is the proband, was investigated for short stature and poor academic progress. In view of the apparent innocuous nature of this genetic imbalance, the deletion was investigated in detail to determine its size (3.6 Mb) and location with reference to molecular markers and genetic content. The deleted region is described by a contig of 37 BACS including the flanking regions, which we have assembled. Several possible contributory factors are considered, which might explain the lack of clinical significance of this large deletion. It is notable that there are few genes in this region and none have known functions. All most likely have copies elsewhere in the genome and a number of other hypothetical genes appear to be members of certain gene families, i.e. none is unique. Part of the region (1 Mb) is also duplicated at the pericentromeric region 11p11. Given the very low proportion of the genome occupied by single copy genes and their uneven distribution, regions such as this, which appear to be functionally haplosufficient, may be more common than hitherto recognised.


Subject(s)
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 11 , Chromosome Banding , Chromosome Mapping , Female , Genetic Carrier Screening , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Male , Pedigree
3.
J Econ Issues ; 24(1): 145-60, 1990 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12283218

ABSTRACT

PIP: The concept of the feminization of poverty in the United States is examined from a demographic perspective, in particular by a comparative analysis of poverty among female-headed and other-headed households. The author concludes that the growth of female-headed households has been an important factor in the feminization of poverty and that the gap in relative affluence between female-headed and other households is increasing. She also notes that female-headed households suffer most from economic downturns because of sex segregation in the work force.^ieng


Subject(s)
Employment , Family Characteristics , Poverty , Sex Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , Women's Rights , Americas , Demography , Developed Countries , Economics , Health Workforce , North America , Population , Population Characteristics , Research , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...