In Vitro Stability and Recovery Studies of Pimavanserin in Water and in Different Vehicles Orally Administered.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Swallowing difficulties (i.e., dysphagia) occur in up to 40% of the adult general population, particularly among the elderly prescribed solid oral dosage forms. Pimavanserin is approved for the treatment of hallucinations and delusions in patients with Parkinson's disease psychosis (PDP) as a 34-mg capsule formulation. Patients with PDP may be at-risk for dysphagia that could affect administration of intact pimavanserin capsules. The stability of oral pimavanserin was evaluated in different liquid/soft food vehicles. METHODS: The stability of pimavanserin intended for oral administration was assessed by sprinkling the contents of 1 pimavanserin 34-mg capsule into water (40 mL), applesauce (40 g), vanilla Ensure (60 mL), or non-pulp orange juice (60 mL). RESULTS: The stability study demonstrated >95% recovery within 24 hours after contents of a 34-mg pimavanserin capsule were dispersed in applesauce, vanilla Ensure®, orange juice, or water. Assay values at 24 h for individual capsules were within 5% of time zero, and no significant change in the impurity profile was observed in any vehicle. Pimavanserin degradation products recovered from various food vehicles for individual and total degradation products were < 0.5% at all time points. In addition, the impurity profile of compatibility samples matched that obtained for a control sample. CONCLUSION: These results support the ability of pimavanserin to be given orally by emptying the capsule contents into soft foods or liquids in accordance with the product label.

Efficacy results of pimavanserin from a multi-center, open-label extension study in Parkinson's disease psychosis patients.

INTRODUCTION: Pimavanserin, a selective 5-HT2A inverse agonist/antagonist, was approved for hallucinations and delusions associated with Parkinson's disease psychosis (PDP). We present durability of response with pimavanserin in patients with PDP for an additional 4 weeks of treatment. METHODS: This was an open-label extension (OLE) study in patients previously completing one of three double-blind, placebo-controlled (Core) studies. All patients received pimavanserin 34 mg once daily. Efficacy assessments included the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS) PD and H + D scales, Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Improvement and Severity scales and Caregiver Burden Scale (CBS), through 4 weeks in the OLE. Safety assessments were conducted at each visit. RESULTS: Of 459 patients, 424 (92.4%) had a Week 4 efficacy assessment. At Week 4 (10 weeks total treatment), SAPS-PD mean (standard deviation) change from OLE baseline was -1.8 (5.5) and for SAPS-H + D was -2.1 (6.2) with pimavanserin 34 mg. Patients receiving placebo during the Core studies had greater improvements (SAPS-PD -2.9 [5.6]; SAPS-H + D -3.5 [6.3]) during the OLE. For participants treated with pimavanserin 8.5 or 17 mg during the Core studies, further improvement was observed during the OLE with pimavanserin 34 mg. The mean change from Core Study baseline for SAPS-PD score was similar among prior pimavanserin 34 mg and prior placebo-treated participants (-7.1 vs. -7.0). The CGI-I response rate (score of 1 or 2) at Week 4 was 51.4%. Adverse events were reported by 215 (46.8%) patients during the first 4 weeks of OLE. The most common AEs were fall (5.9%), hallucination (3.7%), urinary tract infection (2.8%), insomnia (2.4%), and peripheral edema (2.2%) CONCLUSIONS: Patients previously on pimavanserin 34 mg during three blinded core studies had durability of efficacy during the subsequent 4 week OLE SAPS-PD assessment. Patients previously on blinded placebo improved after 4 weeks of OL pimavanserin treatment. These results in over 400 patients from 14 countries support the efficacy of pimavanserin for treating PDP.

An Open-Label, 8-Week Study of Safety and Efficacy of Pimavanserin Treatment in Adults with Parkinson's Disease and Depression.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) experience depression. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate pimavanserin treatment for depression in patients with PD. METHODS: Pimavanserin was administered as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or serotonin/noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor in this 8-week, single-arm, open-label phase 2 study (NCT03482882). The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 8 in Hamilton Depression Scale-17-item version (HAMD-17) score. Safety, including collection of adverse events and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III (MDS-UPDRS III) scores, was assessed in patients who received ≥1 pimavanserin dose. RESULTS: Efficacy was evaluated in 45 patients (21 monotherapy, 24 adjunctive therapy). Mean (SE) baseline HAMD-17 was 19.2 (3.1). Change from baseline to week 8 (least squares [LS] mean [SE]) in the HAMD-17 was -10.8 (0.63) (95% CI, -12.0 to -9.5; p < 0.0001) with significant improvement seen at week 2 (p < 0.0001) and for both monotherapy (week 8, -11.2 [0.99]) and adjunctive therapy (week 8,-10.2 [0.78]). Most patients (60.0%) had ≥50% improvement at week 8, and 44.4% of patients reached remission (HAMD-17 score ≤7). Twenty-one of 47 patients experienced 42 treatment-emergent adverse events; the most common by system organ class were gastrointestinal (n = 7; 14.9%) and psychiatric (n = 7; 14.9%). No negative effects were observed on MMSE or MDS-UPDRS Part III. CONCLUSION: In this 8-week, single-arm, open-label study, pimavanserin as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy was well tolerated and associated with early and sustained improvement of depressive symptoms in patients with PD.

Long-term evaluation of open-label pimavanserin safety and tolerability in Parkinson's disease psychosis.

INTRODUCTION: Pimavanserin is a selective 5-HT2A inverse agonist/antagonist approved for treating hallucinations and delusions associated with Parkinson's disease psychosis (PDP). Results from short-term, placebo-controlled studies demonstrated a positive benefit/risk profile. This multi-year, open-label study assessed long-term safety and tolerability of pimavanserin. METHODS: This was an open-label extension (OLE) study in patients previously completing a double-blind, placebo-controlled study or a previous OLE study. Safety was evaluated from adverse events (AEs), clinical laboratory results, motor symptoms, electrocardiograms (ECG), and mortality. Durability of response was assessed from the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scale and Caregiver Burden Scale (CBS). RESULTS: Of 459 participants treated in this OLE study (average age 71.2 years), the median duration of treatment was 454 days. Over the entire study period (approximately 11 years), ≥1 AE occurred in 392 (85.4%) patients; the majority were of mild to moderate intensity, with fall (32.0%), urinary tract infection (19.0%), and hallucination (13.7%) most common. Serious AEs occurred in 188 (41.0%) patients, and an AE leading to study termination or dose discontinuation occurred in 133 (29.0%) patients. Sixty-one patients died, 59 (12.9%) during treatment or within 30 days after the last dose of study drug; the observed mortality rate was 6.45 per 100 patient-years of exposure. Mean scores for the CGI-S scale and CBS generally remained stable for up to 192 weeks (>3.5 years). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment with pimavanserin 34 mg once daily demonstrated a favorable benefit/risk profile with no unexpected safety concerns. Mortality rates suggested no increased risk following long-term treatment.

CPR to the Rescue!: An Interprofessional Pilot Program: Cultivating Practices for Resilience (CPR) Camp.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: The hCATS (health Colleges Advancing Team Skills) to CPR (Cultivating Practices for Resilience) Camp was an interprofessional pilot program to promote resilience, introduce strategies for coping with stress, cultivate compassion, and promote work-life balance to prevent burnout among health profession students, faculty, and healthcare professionals who team to provide patient care. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: The University of Kentucky (UK) College of Nursing received funding to partner with the UK Center for Interprofessional Health Education for immersive weekend activities utilizing KORU and Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction models, conducted by certified UK faculty experts in self-stewardship techniques such as mindfulness practices. OUTCOMES: Thirty-nine participants from 7 UK colleges and UK HealthCare participated in 4 distinct CPR Camps, completed program assessments, and created team projects. Mean scores from each cohort significantly increased in a retrospective pre/post analysis of student perception of knowledge in all of the following categories: (1) habits and practices for resilient people, (2) strategies for building resilience and preventing/coping with stress/burnout in self and others, and (3) work-life balance (with the exception of cohort 4, for work-life balance). Students indicated on open-response items specific strategies they were willing to adopt going forward. These outcomes met our objectives for developing participants' understanding of resilience practices and adopting useful stress reduction practices. Planning and implementation of team projects successfully brought different professions together to advance learning in resilience. CONCLUSION: The CPR Camp initiative is an effective model for promoting and sustaining resilience-building strategies among health profession students. Similar programming conducted and/or attended by academic and/or health system leaders, such as clinical nurse specialists, can help cultivate practices for resilience among the members of the interprofessional workforce, enabling teams to better cope with stress, prevent burnout, and ultimately improve team-based care delivery for patients and their families.

Pimavanserin for Parkinson's Disease psychosis: Effects stratified by baseline cognition and use of cognitive-enhancing medications.

BACKGROUND: PD psychosis is often associated with cognitive impairment, including dementia, and involves dopaminergic, serotonergic, and cholinergic mechanisms. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the differential effect of the antipsychotic pimavanserin, a selective serotonin 2A receptor inverse agonist, in PD psychosis patients with versus without cognitive impairment and in those receiving versus not receiving cognitive-enhancing medications. METHODS: Data from the pivotal randomized clinical trial of pimavanserin for PD psychosis were stratified by (1) screening MMSE score as cognitively impaired (21-24) versus unimpaired (≥25) and (2) concomitant use versus nonuse of cognitive-enhancing medications. The primary outcome measure was change in the PD-adapted Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms. RESULTS: Mean (pimavanserin vs. placebo) change from baseline was larger in the cognitively impaired (n = 50; -6.62 vs. -0.91; P = 0.002) versus the cognitively unimpaired (n = 135; -5.50 vs. -3.23; p = 0.046) group. The comparable change was -6.04 versus -2.18 (P = 0.012) and -5.66 versus -3.15 (P = 0.041) in patients treated (n = 69) and not treated (n = 116) with concomitant cognitive-enhancing medication. Pimavanserin was similarly tolerated across all cognitive groups with no additional safety concerns identified. Overall adverse event rates were comparable across the concomitant cognitive-enhancing medication groups; however, rates of serious adverse events and discontinuations attributed to adverse events were increased in patients taking cholinesterase inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: The antipsychotic effect of pimavanserin is robust in PD patients with cognitive impairment and may be enhanced by concomitant cognitive-enhancing medication use. Future prospective studies are needed to confirm these preliminary findings. © 2018 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Pimavanserin for the treatment of Parkinson's disease psychosis: number needed to treat, number needed to harm, and likelihood to be helped or harmed.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to describe the efficacy and tolerability of pimavanserin, a highly selective serotonin 5-HT2A receptor inverse agonist/antagonist indicated for the treatment of hallucinations and delusions associated with Parkinson's disease psychosis (PDP), using the metrics of number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm (NNH). METHODS: Categorical efficacy and tolerability data were extracted from the clinical trial databases of the double-blind placebo-controlled studies of pimavanserin in persons with PDP. NNT and NNH values were calculated with their respective 95% confidence intervals. The likelihood to be helped or harmed (LHH) was then calculated contrasting therapeutic response versus discontinuation because of an adverse event. RESULTS: NNT values for pimavanserin 34 mg/d versus placebo for several definitions of clinical response are 10, and/or are not statistically significant, and/or show an advantage for pimavanserin over placebo (such as for postural hypotension). In terms of LHH, pimavanserin 34 mg/d is about five times more likely to result in clinical response (as measured by a ≥3 point decrease from baseline on the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms adapted for Parkinson's disease) versus discontinuation due to an adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: Using the metrics of NNT, NNH, and LHH, pimavanserin 34 mg/d for the treatment of PDP appears to have a compelling benefit/risk profile.

Parkinson's disease and Parkinson's disease psychosis: a perspective on the challenges, treatments, and economic burden.

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease associated with a decrease in the neurotransmitter dopamine and characterized by the cardinal motor hallmarks of resting tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia/akinesia, and postural instability. Lesser-known features of PD revolve around nonmotor concerns including psychosis, dementia, sleep disturbances, autonomic dysfunction, and sensory abnormalities. Parkinson's disease psychosis (PDP) contributes significantly to morbidity, mortality, nursing home placement, and quality of life (QOL). PDP management suffers from a lack of safe, effective pharmacological agents and the opposing nature of atypical antipsychotics and dopaminergic therapies. Pimavanserin, the only atypical antipsychotic currently approved by the FDA for treating PDP-related hallucinations and delusions, has no appreciable affinity for dopaminergic receptors, and a controlled clinical study demonstrated its efficacy in treating PDP-associated hallucinations and delusions without affecting motor function. A recent analysis of all health resource utilization (HRU) and total costs attributable to PD and PDP found that mean 12-month HRU services per patient were 2.3 times higher and costs were 2.1 times higher in the PDP cases, while falls were 3.4 times higher and fractures 2.3 times higher, respectively. Products or services that prevent, delay, or lessen the severity of PDP may contribute to reduced healthcare system costs and improve the QOL of patients with PDP and of their caregivers.

Dissemination of Evidence From Systematic Reviews Through Academic CME Providers: A Feasibility Study.

INTRODUCTION: Although systematic reviews represent a source of best evidence to support clinical decision-making, reviews are underutilized by clinicians. Barriers include lack of awareness, familiarity, and access. Efforts to promote utilization have focused on reaching practicing clinicians, leaving unexplored the roles of continuing medical education (CME) directors and faculty in promoting systematic review use. This study explored the feasibility of working with CME directors and faculty for that purpose. METHODS: A convenience sample of five academic CME directors and faculty agreed to participate in a feasibility study exploring use in CME courses of systematic reviews from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ-SRs). AHRQ-SR topics addressed the comparative effectiveness of health care options. Participants received access to AHRQ-SR reports, associated summary products, and instructional resources. The feasibility study used mixed methods to assess 1) implementation of courses incorporating SR evidence, 2) identification of facilitators and barriers to integration, and 3) acceptability to CME directors, faculty, and learners. RESULTS: Faculty implemented 14 CME courses of varying formats serving 1700 learners in urban, suburban, and rural settings. Facilitators included credibility, conciseness of messages, and availability of supporting materials; potential barriers included faculty unfamiliarity with SRs, challenges in maintaining review currency, and review scope. SR evidence and summary products proved acceptable to CME directors, course faculty, and learners by multiple measures. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates the feasibility of approaches to use AHRQ-SRs in CME courses/programming. Further research is needed to demonstrate generalizability to other types of CME providers and other systemic reviews.