Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 21
Filter
6.
JAMA Surg ; 158(3): 310-315, 2023 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36598769

ABSTRACT

Importance: The lack of family-friendly policies continues to contribute to the underrepresentation and attrition of surgical trainees. Women in surgery face unique challenges in balancing surgical education with personal and family needs. Observations: The Association of Women Surgeons is committed to supporting surgical families and developing equitable family-friendly guidelines. Herein we detail recommendations for adequate paid parental leave, access to childcare, breastfeeding support, and insurance coverage of fertility preservation and assisted reproductive technology. Conclusions and Relevance: The specific recommendations outlined in this document form the basis of a comprehensive initiative for supporting surgical families.


Subject(s)
Internship and Residency , Surgeons , Humans , Female , Fellowships and Scholarships , Parental Leave , Education, Medical, Graduate
7.
Burns ; 48(3): 595-601, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34844815

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Incarcerated patients are a vulnerable population and little is known regarding the epidemiology of burn injury and subsequent outcomes. This study utilizes a national database to assess disparities in care affecting this understudied population. METHODS: The National Burn Repository was queried for adult patients discharged into custody. Patients discharged to jail were compared to those with other dispositions. Additional analysis of the incarcerated patients compared those injured while in custody to those injured prior to incarceration. RESULTS: Between 2002-2011, 809 patients were discharged to jail with 283 (35.0%) sustaining these injuries while in custody. Patients were predominantly male (86.2%) and White (52.3%), with median age 35.7 years (IQR 27.7-45.9). Incarcerated patients had significantly higher rates of drug abuse and psychiatric illness. They had significantly smaller burns (2.0% vs. 3.8%, p < 0.001) and were less likely to undergo an operation but had comparable lengths of stay in the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Although incarcerated burn-injured patients sustain smaller injuries and receive fewer operations they remain hospitalized for similar durations as non-incarcerated patients. Enhanced understanding of burn etiologies and injury characteristics as well as improved insight into the impact of psychosocial factors such as substance abuse and prevalence of psychiatric disorders may help improve care.


Subject(s)
Burns , Prisoners , Substance-Related Disorders , Adult , Burns/epidemiology , Burns/etiology , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Retrospective Studies , Substance-Related Disorders/complications , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology
8.
Am J Surg ; 223(1): 151-156, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34330520

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Psychological consequences of burn injury can be profound. Acute stress disorder (ASD) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are known sequelae, but routine identification is challenging. This study aims to identify patient characteristics associated with outpatient positive screens. METHODS: The Primary Care Posttraumatic Stress Disorder questionnaire (PC-PTSD-4) was administered at initial outpatient Burn Center visits between 5/2018-12/2018. Demographics, injury mechanism, and total body surface area (TBSA) were recorded. Those with ≥3 affirmative answers were considered positive. Patients with positive and negative screens were compared. RESULTS: Of 307 surveys collected, 292 (median TBSA 1.5 %, IQR 0.5-4.0 %) remained for analysis after exclusions. Of those, 24.0 % screened positive. Positive screens were associated with presence of a deep component of the injury, injury mechanism, upper extremity involvement, ICU admission, and prolonged hospital length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Numerous factors distinguish burn injury from other traumatic mechanisms and contribute to disproportionate rates of traumatic stress disorders. Optimization of burn-oriented ASD and PTSD screening protocols can enable earlier intervention.


Subject(s)
Burns/complications , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/epidemiology , Stress Disorders, Traumatic, Acute/epidemiology , Adult , Burn Units/statistics & numerical data , Burns/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Stress Disorders, Traumatic, Acute/diagnosis , Stress Disorders, Traumatic, Acute/psychology
10.
J Burn Care Res ; 41(5): 935-944, 2020 09 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32441739

ABSTRACT

Firefighters are at significant risk for burn injuries. Most are minor and do not significantly affect ability to work in full capacity, but there exists risk for both short- and long-term incapacitation. Many push for earlier return to work than is medically advisable. An online cross-sectional survey was sent to a statewide Professional Firefighters' Union. Multiple-choice format was used to assess demographics, injury details, medical care received, and return to work, with free-text format for elaboration. The survey was sent to 30,000 firefighters, with 413 (1.4%) responses. After exclusions, 354 remained for analysis with 132 burn-injured. Burns were small and affected the head (45.5%) and upper extremities (43.2%). Reported gear use was 90.7%, and the majority were not treated at a Burn Center. While 12 (12.1%) returned prematurely, nearly half knew a colleague who they felt had returned too soon. Factors cited include firefighter culture, finances, pressure from peers and employers, dislike of light duty, and a driving desire to get back to work. While many cite love of the job and a culture of pride and camaraderie that is "in our DNA," firefighters' decisions to return to work after burn injury are equally driven external pressures and obligations. Additional education is needed, which may best be facilitated by treatment at a Burn Center. Improved understanding of factors driving firefighters' views on returning to duty after injury may help establish support systems and improve education regarding risks of premature return to work, particularly with regard to reinjury.


Subject(s)
Burns/psychology , Firefighters/psychology , Personnel Loyalty , Return to Work/psychology , Social Responsibility , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Burns/therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Young Adult
11.
Surgery ; 167(6): 957-961, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32127178

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Opioid-based analgesia is the most common method for pain control in the postoperative period. Limited data exist to compare the adequacy of pain control in the post thyroidectomy period with nonopioid-based analgesia. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of nonopioid-based, postoperative analgesia. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, patients were randomized to 1 of 2 pain control regimens. Sample size was calculated to assess for a pain score difference of 1 based on a visual analog scale. The control group received opioid-based, postoperative analgesia, whereas the study group received nonopioid-based analgesia of acetaminophen and ibuprofen. Pain scores (measured on visual analog scale) and opioid use (converted to morphine equivalent dose) were measured after completion of the operation. RESULTS: The sample sizes for the study and control groups were 49 and 46 patients, respectively. The pain score for the study and control groups 1 hour after the operation (3.3 vs 3.9, P = .35), 6 hours after the operation (2.8 vs 3.0, P = .08), on postoperative day 1 (1.6 vs 2.4, P = .08) and on the first office visit (0.2 vs 0.1, P = .82) did not have a statistically significant difference. Morphine equivalent opioid requirement for pain control in the postoperative period was 0.8 vs 6.9 mg (P < .01), respectively. CONCLUSION: In a randomized control trial, we showed that patients treated with nonopioid analgesia had similar pain scores to those treated with opioids, with the benefit of having lower opioid exposure in the perioperative period.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/therapeutic use , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Thyroidectomy , Acetaminophen/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Ibuprofen/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Oxycodone/therapeutic use , Visual Analog Scale
12.
Am J Surg ; 216(5): 863-868, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29366485

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although racial disparities have been well described in trauma and medical literature, less is known about disparities in the burn population, especially the Native American, Hispanic, Black, and Asian minority groups. This study seeks to identify at-risk populations for differences in patient and social characteristics that may link certain race groups to disparate burn outcomes. METHODS: Data was reviewed from the National Burn Repository. Information regarding patient demographics, co-morbidities, complications, and clinical outcomes was recorded. Student's T-test, ANOVA, and binary logistic regression were used to assess relationships between patient factors and outcomes. RESULTS: The Native American cohort had higher rates of alcoholism, drug abuse, and homelessness compared to all patients. Native Americans also had significantly longer hospital lengths of stay, and higher rates of respiratory failure, pneumonia, sepsis, and wound complications. The Black population demonstrated the highest percentage of injury at home, child abuse, and non-insurance. Mortality was highest in the Black population compared to all patients. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that outcome disparities exist in burn-injured patients in multiple minority groups.


Subject(s)
Burns/ethnology , Health Services Accessibility/trends , Healthcare Disparities/trends , Minority Health , Racial Groups , Risk Assessment , Adult , Databases, Factual , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sociological Factors , United States/epidemiology
13.
Eplasty ; 17: e27, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28943993

ABSTRACT

Objective: Burn-injured patients are highly susceptible to infectious complications, which are often associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Rates of antibiotic resistance have increased, and resistant species such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus provide additional challenges in the form of virulence factors. Proteins can disrupt local healing, leading to systemic immune disruption. To optimize outcomes, treatments that reduce pathogenicity must be identified. This study aims to compare a glycylcycline antibiotic-tigecycline-with clindamycin for effectiveness in treating superantigenic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in burn wounds. Methods: Sprague-Dawley rats received paired 2 × 2-cm burn wounds, which were subsequently inoculated with known virulence factor-producing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or media alone on postinjury day 1. Infected animals received twice-daily tigecycline (high or low dose), twice-daily clindamycin (high or low dose), or saline alone (positive controls). Daily sampling and imaging assessments were performed. Results: Bacterial counts and toxin levels were reduced significantly in antibiotic-treated groups relative to positive controls (P < .001). Results from day 7 showed measurable toxin levels in clindamycin-treated, but not tigecycline-treated, wounds. Imaging analysis revealed a return of wound perfusion in tigecycline-treated animals similar to the sham animals. Transcript analysis using polymerase chain reaction and polymerase chain reaction arrays demonstrated downregulation of gene expression in antibiotic-treated animals as compared with positive controls. Conclusions: Overall, this study supports the use of tigecycline in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-infected burn wounds. While both protein synthesis inhibitors are effective, tigecycline appears to be superior in controlling toxin levels, enabling better wound healing.

14.
J Surg Res ; 216: 185-190, 2017 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28807206

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There exists neither a consensus definition of burn "graft loss" nor a scale with which to grade severity. We introduced an institutional scale in 2014 for quality improvement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed all burned patients with graft loss on departmental Morbidity and Mortality reports between July 2014 and July 2016. Graft loss grades were assigned during the course of clinical care per institutional scale. Chronic nonhealing wounds and nonburn wounds were excluded. Data abstracted included demographics, medical history, injury details, surgical procedures, graft loss, and lengths of stay (LOS). Photos of affected areas were graded by two blinded surgeons, and a linear weighted κ was calculated to assess interrater agreement. RESULTS: Graft loss was noted in 50 patients, with 43 remaining after exclusions. Mean age was 50.1 y. The majority were male (58.1%) and African American (41.9%). Smoking (30.2%) and diabetes (27.9%) were prevalent. Total body surface area involvement ranged from 0.5% to 51.0% (11.8 ± 12.3%). Grade I graft loss was documented on one patient (2.3%), Grade II in 15 (34.9%), Grade III in 12 (27.9%), and Grade IV in 15 (34.9%). Reoperation was performed in 20 (46.5%). Hospital LOS was longer than predicted in 38 patients (88.4%). Seven had significant morbidity, including two amputations. Moderate agreement was reached between blinded surgeons (κ = 0.44, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Graft loss is a major source of morbidity in burn patients. In this cohort, reoperation was common and hospital LOS was extended. Use of a grading scale improves dialog among providers and enables improved understanding of risk factors.


Subject(s)
Burns/surgery , Skin Transplantation , Adult , Aged , Burn Units , Female , Graft Survival , Health Status Indicators , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quality Improvement , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Single-Blind Method , Transplantation, Autologous , Treatment Failure
15.
J Burn Care Res ; 39(1): 10-14, 2017 12 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28368919

ABSTRACT

Extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO) has become an increasingly utilized used strategy to support patients in cardiac and cardiopulmonary failure. The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization reports adult survival rates between 40 and 50%. Utilization Use and outcomes for burned patients undergoing ECMO are poorly understood. The National Burn Repository (version 8.0) was queried for patients with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9) procedure codes for ECMO. Demographics, comorbidities, mechanism, injury details, and clinical outcomes were recorded. ECMO patients were matched one-to-one to those not requiring ECMO based on age, gender, TBSA, and inhalation injury. Group comparisons were made utilizing using χ2 and Mann-Whitney U tests. Thirty ECMO-treated burn patients were identified. Patients were predominantly male (80.0%) and Caucasian (63.3%) with mean age 38.9 ± 20.3 years. The majority were flame injuries (80.0%) of moderate size (17.0 ± 18.7% TBSA), affecting predominantly upper limbs and trunk. Inhalation injury was reported in 26.7%. Respiratory failure was reported in nine, acute respiratory distress syndrome in three, and pneumonia in nine. Fourteen patients survived to discharge. The ECMO cohort had significantly higher rates of cardiovascular comorbidities, concomitant major thoracic trauma, pneumonia, acute renal failure, and sepsis than non-ECMO patients (P < .05). Ventilator usage, intesive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and mortality were also significantly higher in those treated by ECMO (P < .05). Although burn patients placed on ECMO have significantly higher rates of morbidity and mortality than those not requiring ECMO, the mortality rate is equivalent to patients reported by Extracorporeal Life Support Organization. ECMO is a viable option for supporting critically injured burn patients.


Subject(s)
Burns/epidemiology , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Pneumonia/therapy , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cause of Death , Child , Child, Preschool , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Infant , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Pneumonia/mortality , Registries , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/mortality , Respiratory Insufficiency/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Sepsis/epidemiology , Smoke Inhalation Injury/mortality , Smoke Inhalation Injury/therapy , Thoracic Injuries/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
16.
J Burn Care Res ; 39(1): 15-20, 2017 12 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29596679

ABSTRACT

The affect of paralysis-related comorbidities on outcomes in burn-injured patients has not been explored. We hypothesize that comorbid paralysis is associated with increased morbidity in this population. All burned patients with prior diagnoses of paralysis were identified from the National Burn Repository (Version 8.0). One-to-one matching of nonparalyzed burn-injured patients was performed, and nonparametric analysis was used to compare the groups. We identified 432 paralyzed patients, who were predominantly male (70.6%) and Caucasian (57.6%), with an average age of 40.8 ± 19.0 years. The identified level of disability was distinguished as paraplegia (59.5%), hemiplegia (16.9%), quadriplegia (13.9%), or other (9.8%). A majority of injuries occurred in the home (75.2%), primarily due to scalds (48.1%). More than half sustained small injuries with affected total body surface area <5%. Lower extremities were frequently injured (72.2%), with 41.0% affecting exclusively the lower extremities. While the paralysis population had significantly longer hospital lengths of stay, nonparalyzed patients had longer intensive care unit length of stay and ventilator days (P < .001). There was no statistically significant difference in mortality rate between paralyzed and nonparalyzed patients (4.4% vs 4.9%, P = .550). Patients with paralysis are susceptible to small scald injuries in the home. Comorbid paralysis places patients at risk for longer, more indolent hospital stays, when compared with matched nonparalyzed patients with more critical illness. Further investigation is needed regarding the pathophysiologic mechanisms predisposing paralyzed burn patients to increased morbidity.


Subject(s)
Burns/epidemiology , Disabled Persons/statistics & numerical data , Paralysis/epidemiology , Accidents, Home/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Lower Extremity/injuries , Male , Matched-Pair Analysis , Middle Aged , Patient Discharge , Pneumonia/epidemiology , Registries , Respiration, Artificial/statistics & numerical data , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/epidemiology , Smoke Inhalation Injury/epidemiology , Smoking/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology , Wound Infection/epidemiology
17.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 78(3): 459-65; discussion 465-7, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25710414

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Unlike the cervical spine (C-spine), where National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) and the Canadian C-spine Rules can be used, evidence-based thoracolumbar spine (TL-spine) clearance guidelines do not exist. The aim of this study was to develop a clinical decision rule for evaluating the TL-spine after injury. METHODS: Adult (≥15 years) blunt trauma patients were prospectively enrolled at 13 US trauma centers (January 2012 to January 2014). Exclusion criteria included the following: C-spine injury with neurologic deficit, preexisting paraplegia/tetraplegia, and unevaluable examination. Remaining evaluable patients underwent TL-spine imaging and were followed up to discharge. The primary end point was a clinically significant TL-spine injury requiring TL-spine orthoses or surgical stabilization. Regression techniques were used to develop a clinical decision rule. Decision rule performance in identifying clinically significant fractures was tested. RESULTS: Of 12,479 patients screened, 3,065 (24.6%) met inclusion criteria (mean [SD] age, 43.5 [19.8] years [range, 15-103 years]; male sex, 66.3%; mean [SD] Injury Severity Score [ISS], 8.8 [7.5]). The majority underwent computed tomography (93.3%), 6.3% only plain films, and 0.2% magnetic resonance imaging exclusively. TL-spine injury was identified in 499 patients (16.3%), of which 264 (8.6%) were clinically significant (29.2% surgery, 70.8% TL-spine orthosis). The majority was AO Type A1 282 (56.5%), followed by 67 (13.4%) A3, 43 (8.6%) B2, and 32 (6.4%) A4 injuries. The predictive ability of clinical examination (pain, midline tenderness, deformity, neurologic deficit), age, and mechanism was examined; positive clinical examination finding resulted in a sensitivity of 78.4% and a specificity of 72.9%. Addition of age of 60 years or older and high-risk mechanism (fall, crush, motor vehicle crash with ejection/rollover, unenclosed vehicle crash, auto vs. pedestrian) increased sensitivity to 98.9% with specificity of 29.0% for clinically significant injuries and 100.0% sensitivity and 27.3% specificity for injuries requiring surgery. CONCLUSION: Clinical examination alone is insufficient for determining the need for imaging in evaluable patients at risk of TL-spine injury. Addition of age and high-risk mechanism results in a clinical decision-making rule with a sensitivity of 98.9% for clinically significant injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic test, level III.


Subject(s)
Decision Support Techniques , Diagnostic Imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/injuries , Physical Examination , Spinal Injuries/diagnosis , Thoracic Vertebrae/injuries , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sensitivity and Specificity , Trauma Centers , United States
18.
J Pediatr Surg ; 50(1): 78-81, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25598098

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Congenital central hypoventilation syndrome (CCHS), or Ondine's curse, is a rare disorder affecting central respiratory drive. Patients with this disorder fail to ventilate adequately and require lifelong ventilatory support. Diaphragm pacing is a form of ventilatory support which can improve mobility and/or remove the tracheostomy from CCHS patients. Little is known about complications and long-term outcomes of this procedure. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review was performed of CCHS patients undergoing placement of phrenic nerve electrodes for diaphragm pacing between 2000 and 2012. Data abstracted from the medical record included operation duration, ventilation method, number of trocars required, and postoperative and pacing outcomes. RESULTS: Charts of eighteen patients were reviewed. Mean surgical time was 3.3±0.7 hours. In all cases except one, three trocars were utilized for each hemithorax, with no conversions to open procedures. Five patients (27.8%) experienced postoperative complications. The mean ICU stay was 4.3±0.5 days, and the mean hospital stay is 5.7±0.3days. Eleven patients (61.1%) achieved their daily goal pacing times within the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracoscopic placement of phrenic nerve electrodes for diaphragmatic pacing is a safe and effective treatment modality for CCHS. Observed complications were temporary, and the majority of patients were able to achieve pacing goals.


Subject(s)
Diaphragm/innervation , Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods , Hypoventilation/congenital , Phrenic Nerve/physiology , Sleep Apnea, Central/therapy , Adult , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Hypoventilation/therapy , Length of Stay , Male , Retrospective Studies , Thoracoscopy , Tracheostomy , Treatment Outcome
19.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg ; 20(4): 248-52, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25135018

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The harmful effects of smoking have been well-documented in the medical literature for decades. To further the support of smoking cessation, we investigate the effect of smoking on a less studied population, the trauma patient. METHODS: All trauma patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit at the LAC + University of Southern California medical center between January 2007 and December 2011 were included. Patients were stratified into two groups - current smokers and non-smokers. Demographics, admission vitals, comorbidities, operative interventions, injury severity indices, and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II scores were documented. Uni- and multi-variate modeling was performed. Outcomes studied were mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, and length of hospitalization. RESULTS: A total of 1754 patients were available for analysis, 118 (6.7%) patients were current smokers. The mean age was 41.4±20.4, 81.0% male and 73.5% suffered blunt trauma. Smokers had a higher incidence of congestive heart failure (4.2% vs. 0.9%, p=0.007) and alcoholism (20.3% vs. 5.9%, p<0.001), but had a significantly lower APACHE II score. After multivariate regression analysis, there was no significant mortality difference. Patients who smoked spent more days mechanically ventilated (beta coefficient: 4.96 [1.37, 8.55, p=0.007]). CONCLUSION: Smoking is associated with worse outcome in the critically ill trauma patient. On an average, smokers spent 5 days longer requiring mechanical ventilation than non-smokers.


Subject(s)
Smoking/epidemiology , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , APACHE , Adult , California/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Regression Analysis , Respiration, Artificial , Retrospective Studies , Trauma Severity Indices , Treatment Outcome , Wounds and Injuries/therapy , Young Adult
20.
Am J Surg ; 206(5): 655-60, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24011571

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the impact of balanced resuscitation in pediatric trauma patients requiring massive transfusions. Adult data may not be generalizable to children. METHODS: Retrospective analysis assessed patients seen at a level I trauma center between 2003 and 2010 aged ≤18 years requiring massive packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion, defined as transfusion of ≥50% total blood volume. After excluding mortalities in the first 24 hours, the impact of plasma and platelet ratios on mortality was evaluated. RESULTS: Of 6,675 pediatric trauma patients, 105 were massively transfused (mean age, 12.4 ± 6.3 years; mean Injury Severity Score, 25.8 ± 11.4; mortality rate, 18.1%). All deceased patients sustained severe head injuries. Plasma/PRBC and platelet/PRBC ratios were not significantly associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, higher plasma/PRBC and platelet/PRBC ratios were not associated with increased survival in children. The value of aggressive blood product transfusion for injured pediatric patients requires further prospective validation.


Subject(s)
Blood Component Transfusion , Blood Platelets , Plasma , Blood Volume , California/epidemiology , Child , Craniocerebral Trauma/mortality , Craniocerebral Trauma/therapy , Female , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Trauma Centers , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/epidemiology , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...