Optimal rotational interval for 3-dimensional echocardiography data acquisition for rapid and accurate measurement of left ventricular function.

BACKGROUND: Prolonged 3-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) acquisition time currently limits its routine use for calculating left ventricular volume (LVV) and ejection fraction (EF). Our goal was to reduce the acquisition time by defining the largest rotational acquisition interval that still allows 3DE reconstruction for accurate and reproducible LVV and EF calculation. METHODS: Twenty-one subjects underwent magnetic resonance imaging and precordial 3DE with 2 degrees acquisition intervals. Images were processed to result in data sets containing images at 2 degrees, 4 degrees, 8 degrees, 16 degrees, 32 degrees, and 64 degrees intervals by excluding images in between. With use of the paraplane feature, 8 equidistant short-axis slices were generated from each data set. The suitability of these short-axis slices for manual endocardial tracing was scored visually by 4 independent experienced observers. The LVV and EF were calculated by using Simpson's rule from 3DE data sets with 2 degrees, 8 degrees, and 16 degrees intervals, and the results were compared with values obtained from magnetic resonance imaging. The probability of 3DE to detect LVV and EF differences was calculated. RESULTS: All patients were in sinus rhythm with a mean heart rate of 72 bpm (SD + or - 12). The LV short-axis images obtained with 16 degrees rotational scanning intervals allowed LV endocardial tracing in all subjects. Good correlation, close limits of agreement, and nonsignificant differences were found between values of LVV and EF calculated with 3DE at 2 degrees, 8 degrees, and 16 degrees rotational intervals and those obtained with magnetic resonance imaging. At steps of 16 degrees, 3DE had excellent correlation (r = 98, 99, and 99), close limits of agreement (+ or - 38, + or - 28.6, and + or - 4.8), and nonsignificant differences (P =.5,.8, and.2) with values obtained from magnetic resonance imaging for calculating end-diastolic LVV, end-systolic LVV, and EF, respectively. Three-dimensional echocardiography with use of 16 degrees rotational intervals could detect 15-mL differences in end-diastolic volume with a probability of 95%, 11-mL differences in end-systolic volume with a probability of 92%, and 0.02 differences in EF with a probability of 95%. CONCLUSIONS: The 3DE data sets reconstructed with images selected at 16 degrees intervals from data sets obtained at 2 degrees precordial rotational acquisition intervals allowed the generation of LV short-axis images with adequate quality for endocardial border tracing. Therefore precordial acquisition at 16 degrees intervals would be sufficient for the reconstruction of 3DE data sets for LV function measurement. This would reduce the acquisition time while maintaining enough accuracy for clinical decision making and would thus make 3DE more practical as a routine method.

Studies of cardiac function and myocardial tissue characterization.

The heart can be studied using ultrasound techniques. The shape of the heart, its chambers, wall thicknesses, wall tissue characteristics as well as motion of walls and valve leaflets are all diagnostic information. In addition, the blood velocity and its timing within the cardiac cycle is an important diagnostic tool. In the present paper focus will be limited to the analysis of the left ventricular function as observed with two-dimensional and three-dimensional echocardiography and the characteristics of backscattered ultrasound information from the left ventricular chamber wall. Function of the heart is often studied by observation of local wall motion or comparison of chamber volume in maximum and minimum shapes during the cardiac cycle (ejection fraction). Integrated backscatter from the wall is described in examples of cardiac transplantation and hypertrophy. Study of cyclic variation of frequency-dependent attenuation and integrated backscatter indicates that these are independent parameters.

Appropriate 3-dimensional echocardiography data acquisition interval for left ventricular volume quantification: implications for clinical application.

UNLABELLED: Volume-rendered 3-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) acquired with small imaging intervals has been validated for accurate left ventricular (LV) volume measurement. However, its clinical application is often impeded by the lengthy acquisition time. The aim of this study was to examine the accuracy of LV volume measurement from 3DE data acquired at different intervals. METHODS: Transthoracic 3DE LV data sets were acquired at intervals of 2 degrees, 6 degrees, 9 degrees, 12 degrees, 15 degrees, 18 degrees, and 20 degrees in 10 human subjects with various cardiac shapes and function. The LV end-diastolic volume and end-systolic volume were measured from each 3DE data set with the "summation of disks" method. Interobserver and intraobserver variability were also examined. Measurements obtained from data acquired at 2 degrees intervals were used as references for comparison. RESULTS: From 10 subjects a total of 70 3DE data sets were obtained. Data acquisition time decreased from 189 +/- 143 seconds at intervals of 2 degrees to 19 +/- 6 minutes at 20 degrees. No statistically significant difference was found among the measurements derived from data obtained at various intervals. Excellent agreement was obtained between interobserver and intraobserver measurements. CONCLUSION: Data acquired at 12 degrees and 15 degrees intervals remained accurate for LV volume measurement and saved over 80% of time in comparison with data acquired at 2 degrees intervals. A further increase in imaging intervals tended to underestimate LV volumes without significant acceleration of the procedure.

Three-dimensional echocardiography enhances the assessment of ventricular septal defect.

By 3-dimensional echocardiography, the location, relation to the aortic and tricuspid valve, and the size of the ventricular septal defect was assessed and compared with 2-dimensional echocardiography and intraoperative findings. We concluded that 3-dimensional echocardiography accurately assesses the anatomy of the ventricular septal defect, provides additional information, and can be considered a valuable preoperative diagnostic tool.

Paraplane analysis from precordial three-dimensional echocardiographic data sets for rapid and accurate quantification of left ventricular volume and function: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.

OBJECTIVES: Three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) calculates left ventricular volumes (LVV) and ejection fraction (EF) without geometric assumptions, but prolonged analysis time limits its routine use. This study was designed to validate a modified 3DE method for rapid and accurate LVV and EF calculation compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Forty subjects included 15 normal volunteers (group A) and 25 patients with segmental wall motion abnormalities and global hypokinesis caused by ischemic heart disease (group B) who underwent 3DE with precordial rotational acquisition technique (2-degree interval with electrocardiographic and respiratory gating) and MRI at 0.5 T, electrocardiogram (ECG)-triggered multislice multiphase T1-weighted fast field echo. End-diastolic and end-systolic LVV and EF were calculated from both techniques with Simpson's rule by manual endocardial tracing of equidistant parallel left ventricular short-axis slices. Slicing from the 3DE data sets were done by both 2.9-mm slice thickness (method 3DE-A) and by 8 equidistant short-axis slices (method 3DE-B); for MRI analysis, 9-mm slice thickness was used. RESULTS: Analysis time required for manual endocardial tracing of end-diastolic and end-systolic short-axis slices was 10 minutes for the 3DE-B method compared with 40 minutes by the 3DE-A method. For all 40 subjects the mean +/- SD of end-diastolic LVV (mL) were 181 +/- 76, 179 +/- 73, and 182 +/- 76; for end-systolic LVV (mL), 120 +/- 76, 120 +/- 75, and 122 +/- 77; and for EF (%), 39 +/- 18, 38 +/- 18, and 38 +/- 18 for MRI, 3DE-A, and 3DE-B methods, respectively. The differences between 3DE-A and 3DE-B with MRI for calculating end-diastolic and end-systolic LVV and EF were not significant for the whole group of subjects as well as for the subgroups. The 3DE-B method had excellent correlation and close limits of agreement with MRI for calculating end-diastolic and end-systolic LVV and EF: r = 0.98 (-1.3 +/- 26.6), 0.99 (-1.6 +/- 21. 2), and 0.99 (0.2 +/- 5.2), respectively. The correlation between 3DE-A and MRI were r = 0.97, 0.98, and 0.98, and the limits of agreement were -1.4 +/- 36, -0.6 +/- 26, and 0.6 +/- 8 for calculating end-diastolic and end-systolic LVV and EF, respectively. In addition, excellent correlation and close limits of agreement between 3DE-A and 3DE-B with MRI for LVV and EF calculation was also found for the subgroups. Intraobserver and interobserver variability (SEE) of MRI for calculating end-diastolic and end-systolic LVV and EF were 6.3, 4.7, and 2.1; and 13.6, 11.5, and 4.7; respectively, whereas that for 3DE-B were 3.1, 4.4, and 2.2; and 6.2, 3.8, and 3. 6; respectively. Comparable observer variability was also found for the A and B subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: The 3DE-A and 3DE-B methods have excellent correlation and close limits of agreement with MRI for calculating LVV and EF in both normal subjects and cardiac patients. The 3DE-B method by paraplane analysis with 8 equidistant short-axis slices has observer variability similar to MRI and reduces the 3DE analysis time to 10 minutes, therefore offering a rapid, reproducible, and accurate method for LVV and EF calculation.

Improved quantification of myocardial mass by three-dimensional echocardiography using a deposit contrast agent.

The aim of the study was to assess the usefulness of a novel contrast agent in combination with three-dimensional echocardiography for improved mass quantification. Three-dimensional reconstruction of left ventricular myocardium was performed from images obtained with rotational epicardial acquisition in eight open-chested pigs, before and after injection of a deposit contrast agent, Quantison Depot. Three-dimensional echocardiographic myocardial mass values were in excellent agreement with weighted mass (differences -1.6 +/- 5.0 g for end-diastolic frame, -2.8 +/- 4.5 g for end-systolic, 1.0 +/- 1.0 g for end-diastolic with contrast and 0.6 +/- 2.0 g for end-systolic with contrast, p = NS). Left ventricular mass measurements after contrast injection were more accurate and had less measurement variability. In conclusion, myocardial contrast enhancement improves left ventricular mass calculation with three-dimensional echocardiography.

Left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with normal and distorted left ventricular shape by three-dimensional echocardiographic methods: a comparison with radionuclide angiography.

BACKGROUND: Serial evaluation of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) is important for the management and follow-up of cardiac patients. Our aim was to compare LVEF calculated from two three-dimensional echocardiographic (3DE) methods with multigated radionuclide angiography (RNA), in patients with normal and abnormally shaped ventricles. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-one consecutive patients referred for RNA underwent precordial rotational 3DE acquisition of 90 cut-planes. From the volumetric data set, LVEF was calculated by (a) Simpson's rule (3DS) through manual endocardial tracing of LV short-axis series at 3 mm slice distance and (b) apical biplane modified Simpson's method ( MS) in 29 patients by manual endocardial tracing of the apical four-chamber view and its computer-derived orthogonal view. Patients included three groups: A, 17 patients with LV segmental wall motion abnormalities; B, 13 patients with LV global hypokinesis; and C, 11 patients with normal LV wall motion. For all the 41 patients, there was excellent correlation, close limits of agreement, and nonsignificant difference between 3DS and RNA for LVEF calculation (r = 0.99, [-6.7, +6.9] and p = 0.9), respectively. For the 29 patients, excellent correlation and nonsignificant differences between LVEF calculated by both 3DS and BMS and values obtained by RNA were found (r = 0.99 and 0.97, p = 0.7 and p = 0.5, respectively). In addition, no significant difference existed between values of LVEF obtained from RNA, 3DS, and BMS by the analysis of variance (p = 0.6). The limits of agreement tended to be closer between 3DS and RNA (-6.8, +7.2) than between BMS and RNA (-8.3, +9.7). The intraobserver and inter-observer variability of RNA, 3DS, and BMS for calculating LVEF(%) were (0.8, 1.5), (1.3, 1.8), and (1.6, 2.6), respectively. There were closer limits of agreement between 3DS and RNA for LVEF calculation in A, B, and C patient subgroups [(-3.5, +5), (-8.4, +5.6), and (-7.8, +8.6)] than that between BMS and RNA [(-8.1, +10.7), (-11.9, +9.3), and (-9.1, +11.3)], respectively. CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference existed between RNA, 3DS, and BMS for LVEF calculation. 3DS has better correlation and closer limits of agreement than BMS with RNA for LVEF calculation, particularly in patients with segmental wall motion abnormalities and global hypokinesis. 3DS has a comparable observer variability with RNA. Therefore the use of 3DS for serial accurate LVEF calculation in cardiac patients is recommended.

Measurements and day-to-day variabilities of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by three-dimensional echocardiography and comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.

The aim of this study was to assess day-to-day variability of left ventricular (LV) volume and ejection fraction (EF) calculated from 3-dimensional echocardiography (3-DE) and to compare the reproducibility of the measurement with magnetic resonance imaging. Forty-six subjects were examined including 15 normal volunteers (group A) and 31 patients with LV dysfunction (group B). Precordial 3-DE acquisition was performed at 2 degrees rotational intervals and repeated 1 week later. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed at 0.5 T. End-diastolic and end-systolic LV volumes were derived using Simpson's rule by manual endocardial tracing of 8 equidistant parallel LV short-axis slices with 3-DE, whereas 9-mm slices were used with magnetic resonance imaging. The mean +/- SD of end-diastolic and end-systolic LV volumes (ml) and EF (%) from magnetic resonance imaging were 182 +/- 75, 121 +/- 76, and 39 +/- 18, whereas those from 3-DE were 182 +/- 76, 121 +/- 77, and 39 +/- 18 respectively. Day-to-day measurements of end-diastolic and end-systolic LV volumes, and EF on 3-DE were not significantly different as assessed with SEE (2.7, 1.1, and 2.4, respectively). Intra- and interobserver SEE for calculating end-diastolic and end-systolic LV volumes and EF for magnetic resonance imaging were 6.3, 4.7, and 2.1 and 13.6, 11.5, and 4.7, respectively, whereas those for 3-DE were 3.1, 4.4, and 2.2 and 6.2, 3.8, and 3.6, respectively. Day-to-day variability of LV volume and EF calculation on 3-DE were small and not significantly different for normal and dysfunctional left ventricles. Observer variabilities of 3-DE were fewer than those of magnetic resonance imaging. Therefore, 3-DE is recommended for serial assessment of LV volume and EF in normal and abnormally shaped ventricles.

Quantification of the aortic valve area in three-dimensional echocardiographic data sets: analysis of orifice overestimation resulting from suboptimal cut-plane selection.

BACKGROUND: Our study was designed to determine the feasibility of three-dimensional echocardiographic (3DE) aortic valve area planimetry and to evaluate potential errors resulting from suboptimal imaging plane position. METHODS AND RESULTS: Transesophageal echocardiography with acquisition of images for 3DE was performed in 27 patients. Aortic valve orifice was planimetered in two-dimensional echocardiograms (2DE) and in two-dimensional views reconstructed from 3DE data sets optimized for the level of the cusp tips. To evaluate the errors caused by suboptimal cut-plane selection, orifice was also measured in cut-planes angulated by 10, 20, and 30 degrees or shifted by 1.5 to 7.5 mm. Planimetered orifice areas was similar in 2DE and 3DE studies: 2.09 +/- 0.97 cm2 versus 2.07 +/- 0.92 cm2. Significant overestimation was observed with cut-plane angulation (0.09, 0.19, and 0.34 cm2 at 10 degree increments) or parallel shift (0.11, 0.22, 0.33, 0.43, and 0.63 cm2 at 1.5 mm increments). Three-dimensional echocardiographic measurement reproducibility was very low and superior to that of 2DE. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional echocardiography allows accurate aortic valve area quantification with excellent reproducibility. Relatively small inaccuracy in cut-plane adjustment is a major source of errors in aortic valve area planimetry.

Gender differences in the accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

The accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) has not been yet evaluated in women. We studied the effect of gender on the accuracy of DSE for the diagnosis of CAD in 306 consecutive patients (210 men and 96 women) with limited exercise capacity and suspected myocardial ischemia who underwent coronary angiography within 3 months of DSE. There were no serious complications during DSE. Men had a higher prevalence of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (7% vs 0.03%, p <0.05) and supraventricular tachycardia (9% vs 0.03%, p <0.05) during the test compared with women. Peak stress rate-pressure product was not different in men and women (18,140 +/- 4,187 vs 18,543 +/- 4,223). Significant CAD (> or =50% luminal diameter stenosis) was present in 171 men (81%) and in 62 women (65%, p <0.005). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of ischemic pattern at DSE for the diagnosis of significant CAD were 76% (confidence interval [CI] 67 to 84), 94% (CI 89 to 99), and 82% (CI 75 to 90) in women and 73% (CI 67 to 79), 77% (CI 71 to 83), and 74% (CI 68 to 80) in men, respectively. Overall specificity was higher in women than in men (p <0.05). Regional accuracy of DSE was significantly higher in women than in men in the 3 arterial regions (84% [CI 79 to 88] vs 75% [CI 72 to 79], p <0.005). It is concluded that DSE is a safe and feasible method for the diagnosis of CAD in women. The overall specificity and the regional accuracy of DSE are higher in women than in men. Further studies are required to evaluate the functional significance of these findings and their reproducibility in different patient populations.

The apical long-axis rather than the two-chamber view should be used in combination with the four-chamber view for accurate assessment of left ventricular volumes and function.

BACKGROUND: Most biplane methods for the echocardiographic calculation of left ventricular volumes assume orthogonality between paired views from the apical window. Our aim was to study the accuracy of biplane left ventricular volume calculations when either the apical two-chamber or long-axis views are combined with the four-chamber view. The left ventricular volumes calculated from three-dimensional echocardiographic data sets were used as a reference. Twenty-seven patients underwent precordial three-dimensional echocardiography using rotational acquisition of planes at 2-degree intervals, with ECG and respiratory gating. End-diastolic and end-systolic left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction on three-dimensional echocardiography were calculated by (1) Simpson's methods (3DS) at 3 mm short-axis slice thickness (reference method) and by (2) biplane ellipse from paired views using either apical four- and two-chamber views (BE-A) or apical four- and long-axis views (BE-B). Observer variabilities were studied by the standard error of the estimate % (SEE) in 19 patients for all methods. RESULTS: The spatial angles (mean +/- SD) between the apical two-chamber, long-axis and four-chamber views were 63.3 degrees +/- 19.7 and 99.1 degrees +/- 25.6, respectively. The mean +/- SD of end-diastolic and end-systolic left ventricular volumes (ml) and ejection fraction (%) by 3DS were 142.2 +/- 60.9, 91.8 +/- 59.6 and 39.6 +/- 17.5, while that by BE-A were 126.7 +/- 60.4, 84.0 +/- 57.9 and 39 +/- 17 and by BE-B were 134.3 +/- 62.4, 88.6 +/- 59.7 and 39.1 +/- 16.7, respectively. BE-B intra-observer (8.4, 6.7 and 3.5) and inter-observer (9.8, 11.5 and 5.4) SEE for end-diastolic and end-systolic left ventricular volumes (ml) and ejection fraction (%), respectively, were smaller than that for BE-A (10.8, 8.8 and 4.1 and 11.4, 14.7 and 6.1, respectively). There was excellent correlation between 3DS and BE-A (r = 0.99, 0.98 and 0.98) and BE-B (0.98, 0.98 and 0.98) for calculating end-diastolic and end-systolic left ventricular volume and ejection fractions, respectively. There were no significant differences between BE-A and BE-B with 3DS for end-diastolic and end-systolic left ventricular volume and ejection fraction calculations (P = 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4 and P = 0.5, 0.5 and 0.4, respectively). There were closer limits of agreement (mean +/- 2 SD) between 3DS and BE-B 7.9 +/- 18.8, 3.2 +/- 14.2 and 0.8 +/- 5.8 than that between 3DS and BE-A 15.5 +/- 19.6, 7.8 +/- 16.2 and 1.1 +/- 7.4 for calculating end-diastolic and end-systolic left ventricular volume and ejection fractions, respectively. CONCLUSION: Both apical two-chamber and apical long-axis views are not orthogonal to the apical four-chamber view. Observer variabilities of BE-B were smaller than that for BE-A. BE-A and BE-B have excellent correlation and non-significant differences with 3DS for left ventricular volume and ejection fraction calculations. There were closer limits of agreement between BE-B with 3DS for left ventricular volume and ejection fraction calculations than that between BE-A and 3DS. Therefore, we recommend the use of the apical long-axis rather than the two-chamber view in combination with the four-chamber view for accurate biplane left ventricular volume and ejection fraction calculations.

Accurate assessment of mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis by three-dimensional echocardiography.

The accuracy of measurements of mitral valve orifice area (MVA) from three-dimensional echocardiographic (3DE) image data sets obtained by a transthoracic or transesophageal rotational imaging probe was studied in 15 patients with native mitral stenosis. The smallest MVA was identified from a set of eight parallel short-axis cut planes of the mitral valve between the anulus and the tips of leaflets (paraplane echocardiography) and measured by planimetry. In addition, MVA was measured from the two-dimensional short-axis view (2DE). Values of MVA measured by 3DE and 2DE were compared with those calculated from Doppler pressure half-time (PHT) as a gold standard. Observer variabilities were studied for 3DE. MVA measured from PHT ranged between 0.55 and 3.19 cm2 (mean +/- SD 1.57 +/- 0.73 cm2), from 3DE between 0.83 and 3.23 cm2 (mean +/- SD 1.55 +/- 0.67 cm2), and from 2DE between 1.27 and 4.08 cm2 (mean +/- SD 1.9 +/- 0.7 cm2). The variability of intraobserver and interobserver measurements for 3DE measurements was not significantly different (p = 0.79 and p = 0.68, respectively); for interobserver variability, standard error of the estimate = 0.25. There was excellent correlation, close limits of agreement (mean difference +/- 2 SD), and nonsignificant differences between 3DE and PHT for MVA measurements (r = 0.98 [0.02 +/- 0.3] and p = 0.6), respectively. There was moderate correlation, wider limits of agreement, and significant difference between 2DE and PHT for MVA measurements (r = 0.89 [0.32 +/- 0.66] and p = 0.002), respectively. This may be related to the difficulties in visualization of the smallest orifice in precordial short-axis views. This study suggests that three-dimensional image data sets, by providing the possibility of "computer slicing" to generate equidistant parallel cross sections of the mitral valve independently from physically dictated ultrasonic windows, allow accurate and reproducible measurement of the MVA.

Accurate measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction by three-dimensional echocardiography. A comparison with radionuclide angiography.

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional echocardiography is a promising technique for calculation of left ventricular ejection fraction, because it allows its measurement without geometric assumptions. However, few data exist that study its reproducibility and accuracy in patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-five patients underwent radionuclide angiography and three-dimensional echocardiography that used the rotational technique (2 degrees interval and ECG and respiratory gating). Left ventricular volume and ejection fraction were calculated by use of Simpson's rule at a slice thickness of 3 mm. Analyses were performed to define the largest slice thickness required for accurate calculation of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction. Three-dimensional echocardiography showed excellent correlation with radionuclide angiography for calculation of left ventricular ejection fraction (mean +/- SD, 38.9 +/- 19.8 and 38.5 +/- 18.0, respectively; r = .99); their mean difference was not significant (0.03 +/- 0.17; P = .3), and they had a close limit of agreement (-0.385, 0.315). Intraobserver variability for radionuclide angiography and three-dimensional echocardiography was 4.2% and 2.6%, respectively, whereas interobserver variability was 6.2% and 5.3%, respectively. There was no significant difference between left ventricular volume and ejection fraction calculated at a slice thickness of 3 mm and that calculated at different slice thicknesses up to 24 mm. However, the standard deviation of the mean difference showed a stepwise increase, particularly at thicknesses > 15 mm. At a slice thickness of 15 mm, the probability of three-dimensional echocardiography to detect > or = 6% difference in ejection fraction was 80%. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional echocardiography has excellent correlation with radionuclide angiography for calculation of left ventricular ejection fraction in patients and has an observer variability similar to that of radionuclide angiography. We recommend the use of a 15-mm-thick slice for accurate and rapid measurement of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction.