ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study scrutinizes the meaning of deterioration in psychotherapy beyond the widely used statistical definition of reliable symptom increase pre-to-post treatment. METHOD: An explanatory sequential mixed-methods multiple case study was conducted, combining quantitative pre-post outcome evaluation of self-reported depression symptoms and qualitative analysis of patients' interviews. In a Randomized Controlled Study on the treatment of Major Depression, three patients showing reliable increase in symptom severity on the BDI-II pre-to-post therapy were selected. An interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) was performed on individual interviews conducted pre-, peri- and post-treatment. RESULTS: Cross-case outcome experiences were: (1) uncontrollable complaints; (2) remaining questions and uninternalized insights and (3) persisting interpersonal difficulties. Within-case idiosyncratic differences revealed that the statistical classification of "deterioration" not necessarily corresponds to a "deteriorated experience," nor univocally indicates unwanted therapy effects. Our findings point at the influences of the patient's (lack of) agency in the process, a discrepancy between patients' expectations and the therapy offer, the therapeutic relationship, interpersonal difficulties, and contextual influences. CONCLUSION: The meaning of symptomatic deterioration should be interpreted within a patient's idiosyncratic context. The multi-faceted nature of deterioration requires further research to rely on multiple perspectives and mixed methods.
ABSTRACT
Case study methods are increasingly recognized as crucial methods to enhance understanding of the complexity of psychotherapy processes and as way to bridge the science-practice gap. The Single Case Archive (SCA) was constructed to facilitate access to the existing field of case study research for academic, clinical, and educational purposes. Cases were selected through systematic screening of relevant peer-reviewed journals in the field of psychotherapy research and rigorous snowball sampling. All cases meeting inclusion criteria were inventoried using the Inventory for Basic Information in Single Cases that maps study, patient, therapist, and therapy characteristics. About 3,471 cases from 175 peer-reviewed journals published between 1955 and 2019 were included in the SCA database. The SCA comprises cases from different theoretical backgrounds, discussing patients from different age categories, with different presenting problems going through a diversity of psychotherapeutic treatments that are studied using a range of methods. Cases differ strongly with respect to the amount of information that is present in the case study, and the field should pay more attention to ethical considerations like informed consent and providing relevant basic descriptive information. An online platform makes the SCA database searchable by researchers, clinicians, and students. In conclusion, the SCA is a unique resource that makes case studies more easily accessible, facilitates meta-studies and reviews of case studies, and stimulates methodological developments in the field of case study research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
Subject(s)
Psychotherapeutic Processes , Psychotherapy , Humans , Psychotherapy/methodsABSTRACT
Single case studies are at the origin of both theory development and research in the field of psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. While clinical case studies are the hallmark of psychoanalytic theory and practice, their scientific value has been strongly criticized. To address problems with the subjective bias of retrospective therapist reports and uncontrollability of clinical case studies, systematic approaches to investigate psychotherapy process and outcome at the level of the single case have been developed. Such empirical case studies are also able to bridge the famous gap between academic research and clinical practice as they provide clinically relevant insights into how psychotherapy works. This study presents a review of psychoanalytic empirical case studies published in ISI-ranked journals and maps the characteristics of the study, therapist, patient en therapies that are investigated. Empirical case studies increased in quantity and quality (amount of information and systematization) over time. While future studies could pay more attention to providing contextual information on therapist characteristics and informed consent considerations, the available literature provides a basis to conduct meta-studies of single cases and as such contribute to knowledge aggregation.
