Comparative evaluation of biased agonists Sarcosine1 , d-Alanine8 -Angiotensin (Ang) II (SD Ang II) and Sarcosine1 , Isoleucine8 -Ang II (SI Ang II) and their radioiodinated congeners binding to rat liver membrane AT1 receptors.

Angiotensin II analogue and ß-arrestin biased agonist TRV027 (Sarcosine1 , d-Alanine8 -Angiotensin (Ang) II; SD Ang II), developed by Trevena, Inc. in the early 2010s, brought hopes of a novel treatment for cardiovascular diseases, due to its ability to simultaneously cause signaling through the ß-arrestin signaling pathway, while antagonizing the pathophysiological effects of Ang II mediated by the AT1 receptor G protein signaling cascades. However, a phase II clinical trial of this agent revealed no significant benefit compared to placebo treatment. Using 125 I-Sarcosine1 , Isoleucine8 -Ang II (125 I-SI Ang II) radioligand receptor competition binding assays, we assessed the relative affinity of TRV027 compared to SI Ang II for liver AT1 receptors. We also compared radioiodinated TRV027 (125 I-SD Ang II) binding affinity for liver AT1 receptors with 125 I-SI Ang II. We found that despite its anticipated gain in metabolic stability, TRV027 and 125 I-SD Ang II had reduced affinity for the AT1 receptor compared with SI Ang II and 125 I-SI Ang II. Additionally, male-female comparisons showed that females have a higher AT1 receptor density, potentially attributed to tissue-dependent estrogen and progesterone effects. Peptide drugs have become more popular over the years due to their increased bioavailability, fast onset of action, high specificity, and low toxicity. Even though Trevena®'s biased agonist peptide TRV027 offered greater stability and potency compared to earlier AT1 R biased agonists, it failed its phase II clinical trial in 2016. Further refinements to AT1 R biased agonist peptides to improve affinity, as seen with SI Ang II, with better stability and bioavailability, has the potential to achieve the anticipated biased agonism.

CGP42112: the full AT2 receptor agonist and its role in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system: no longer misunderstood.

For years, the AT2R-selective ligand CGP42112 has been erroneously characterized as a partial agonist, partly due to its ability to also interact with the AT1R at high concentrations. As late as 2009, it was still being characterized as an antagonist as well. In this perspective/opinion piece, we try to resolve the ambiguity that surrounds the efficacy of this compound by extensively reviewing the literature, tracing its beginnings to 1989, showing that CGP42112 has never been convincingly shown to be a partial agonist or an antagonist at the AT2R. While CGP42112 is now routinely characterized as an AT2R agonist, regrettably, there is a paucity of studies that can validate its efficacy as a full agonist at the AT2R, leaving the door open for continuing speculation regarding the extent of its efficacy. Hopefully, the information presented in this perspective/opinion piece will firmly establish CGP42112 as a full agonist at the AT2R such that it can once again be used as a tool to study the AT2R.

Countering the classical renin-angiotensin system.

It is well-established that Ang-(1-7) counteracts the effects of Ang II in the periphery, while stimulating vasopressin release and mimicking the activity of Ang II in the brain, through interactions with various receptors. The rapid metabolic inactivation of Ang-(1-7) has proven to be a limitation to therapeutic administration of the peptide. To circumvent this problem, Alves et al. (Clinical Science (2021) 135(18), https://doi.org/10.1042/CS20210599) developed a new transgenic rat model that overexpresses an Ang-(1-7)-producing fusion protein. In this commentary, we discuss potential concerns with this model while also highlighting advances that can ensue from this significant technical feat.