Visual Liver Score to Stratify Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis Risk and Determine Selective Intraoperative Liver Biopsy in Obesity.

BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and its progressive form, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), are endemic in obesity. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility of a simple intraoperative visual liver score to stratify the risk of NASH and NAFLD in obesity and determine the need for liver biopsy. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study of obese adults undergoing bariatric surgery. The surgical team used a visual liver score to evaluate liver colour, size and surface. This was compared to histology from an intraoperative liver biopsy. RESULTS: There were 152 participants, age 44.6 ± 12 years, BMI 45 ± 8.3 kg/m2. Prevalence of NAFLD was 70.4%, with 12.1% NASH and 26.4% borderline NASH. Single-visual components were less accurate than total composite score. Steatosis was most accurately identified (significant steatosis: AUROC 0.746, p < 0.05; severe steatosis: AUROC 0.855, p < 0.05). NASH was identified with moderate accuracy (AUROC 0.746, p = 0.001), with sensitivity 75% for a score ≥ 2. Stratification into low (≤ 1) and high-risk (≥ 4) scores accurately identified patients who should or should not have an intraoperative biopsy. Most patients with a normal-appearing liver did not have disease (94.4%). The structured visual assessment was quick and interobserver agreement was reasonable (κ = 0.53, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A simple, structured tool based on liver appearance can be a useful and reliable tool for NAFLD risk stratification and identification of patients who would most and least benefit from a biopsy. A normal liver appearance reliably excludes significant liver disease, avoiding the need for liver biopsy in patients otherwise at high clinical risk of NASH.

Radical gastric cancer surgery results in widespread upregulation of pro-tumourigenic intraperitoneal cytokines.

BACKGROUND: Radical surgical resection is the mainstay of curative treatment for oesophagogastric malignancy. However, survival and recurrence rates remain poor. Theoretical data suggests that the inflammatory response to surgery can promote tumour recurrence. The local and systemic inflammatory response to radical oesophagogastric cancer surgery has not been fully characterized. We aimed to measure this response, particularly factors associated with tumour implantation. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing radical junctional or gastric cancer resection over 12 months were recruited. Repeated serum and adipose tissue were collected intra-operatively. Adipose tissue was collected adjacent and remote to the tumour, and cytokine messenger RNA (mRNA) expression was measured. Post-operatively, daily serum was collected for 7 days, and analysed for inflammatory cell profile and cytokine concentration. RESULTS: There were nine patients recruited (67.1 ± 2.1 years). mRNA expression of interleukin-6 (IL-6), CC-chemokine ligand-2 and IL-1ß increased in adipose tissue intra-operatively (P < 0.05), equally both adjacent and remote from the tumour site. Serum IL-6 concentration increased from 23.3 pg/mL to 161.8 pg/mL intra-operatively (P < 0.05) before falling steadily to 35.7 pg/mL post-operatively (P < 0.05). Serum tumour necrosis factor-α was elevated throughout, and IL-1ß levels were unaffected. Leukocyte and neutrophil populations increased, while T-cell and dendritic cell populations decreased intra-operatively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Radical surgery dramatically upregulates the expression of pro-tumourigenic cytokines in the peritoneum. There is also a marked systemic immune and inflammatory response to surgery, including downregulation of T-cell and dendritic cell populations. This offers two potential pathways that may facilitate tumour progression - local inflammation promoting peritoneal adherence and implantation, and secondary suppression of immunosurveillance due to circulating inflammatory response.

Assessing quality of care in oesophago-gastric cancer surgery in Australia.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes of oesophago-gastric cancer are poor and highly variable between centres. It is important that complex multimodal treatments are applied optimally. Low case volumes at Australian centres mean that the analysis of crude outcomes is an inadequate assessment of overall quality of care. Detailed analysis across a range of quality domains offers the opportunity to measure performance. METHODS: We compared data from the UK National Oesophago-gastric Cancer Audit 2010 with the prospective Alfred Hospital oesophago-gastric cancer database. RESULTS: There were 314 Alfred and 17 279 UK patients identified. The volume of patients assessed by the Alfred was equal to the second highest quartile in the UK trust (4-5 new cases per month). Case ascertainment was better, capturing 84% of all oesophago-gastric cancer within the Alfred prospective audit (P < 0.001). The use of staging CT and PET scans was more common among Alfred patients (99% versus 89%, P < 0.01 and 83.8% versus 17%, P < 0.01, respectively). More patients embarked on a curative pathway (P < 0.01), with greater use of neo-adjuvant therapies. Acceptable lymph node yields were less in oesophagectomies (88.2% versus 96.2%, P < 0.01) and similar in gastrectomies (77.4% versus 74.6%, P = 0.61). Higher overall complications were observed in Alfred patients (P < 0.01), predominantly due to respiratory complications. Perioperative mortality after resection and 1-year survival was similar. CONCLUSIONS: Comparing a range of quality domains as a means of identifying areas of deficiency is feasible. This allows for contemporaneous improvements in service quality and may be more appropriate in the Australian setting than focusing on volume.

The Physiology and Pathophysiology of Gastroesophageal Reflux in Patients with Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band.

INTRODUCTION: The effect of the laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) on esophageal acid exposure and reflux is poorly understood. Optimal technique and normative values for acid exposure have not been established in this group. METHODS: High-resolution manometry (HRM) and 24-h ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring were performed in three groups: asymptomatic LAGB, symptomatic LAGB, and pre-operative reflux patients. This technique utilized intraluminal pressure signatures during HRM to guide accurate pH sensor placement. RESULTS: The LAGB groups were well matched: age 48 vs 51 years (p = 0.249), weight loss 27.3 vs 26.7 kg (p = 0.911). The symptomatic group had a larger gastric pouch (5.2 vs 3.3 cm, p = 0.012), with higher esophageal acid exposure (10.8 vs 0.9%, p < 0.001). Two acidification patterns were observed: irritant and volume acidification, associated with substantial supine acidification. Symptomatic LAGB had altered esophageal motility, with poorer lower esophageal sphincter basal tone (8.0 vs 17.7 mmHg, p = 0.022) and impaired contractility of the lower esophageal segment (90 vs 40%, p = 0.009). Compared to pre-operative reflux patients, symptomatic LAGB patients demonstrated higher total and supine esophageal acid exposure (10.8 vs 7.0%, p = 0.010; 14.9 vs 5.1%, p < 0.001), less symptoms (2 vs 6, p = 0.001) and lower symptom index (0.7 vs 0.9, p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory pH monitoring is an effective technique if the pH sensor is positioned appropriately using HRM. The correctly positioned LAGB appears associated with low esophageal acidification. In contrast, patients with symptoms or pouch dilatation can have markedly elevated esophageal acidification, particularly when supine. This is a different pattern compared to pre-operative patients and importantly can be disproportionate to symptoms.

Diagnosis and Management of Oesophageal Cancer in Bariatric Surgical Patients.

BACKGROUND: Oesophageal cancer following bariatric surgery adds significant complexity to an already challenging disease. There is limited data on the diagnosis, presentation and management in these complex cases. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study on prospectively collected data over 10 years was conducted. The oesophago-gastric cancer database was searched for patients with prior bariatric surgery. Data were retrieved on bariatric and cancer management. RESULTS: We identified nine patients with oesophageal or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma after bariatric surgery. Mean age was 58.3 ± 6.9 years, and duration from bariatric surgery was 13.2 ± 9.4 years. Weight loss at diagnosis was 30.6 ± 23.3 kg (excess weight loss 58.1 % ± 29.6). Modes of presentation were Barrett's surveillance (n = 3), reflux symptoms (n = 4) and incidental (n = 2). Management was surgical resection (n = 4), endoscopic mucosal resection (n = 2) and palliative (n = 3). Surgical resections were challenging due to adhesions, obesity, luminal dilatation and scarring on the stomach. There were two substantial leaks following gastroplasty. CONCLUSIONS: Oesophageal cancer following bariatric surgery is a challenging problem, and surgical resection carries high risk. A high index of suspicion is required and symptoms investigated precipitously. Technical challenges of operating on obese patients and the specific effects of previous bariatric procedures need to be understood, particularly the limitations on reconstructive options.

Ex vivo dissection increases lymph node yield in oesophagogastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Retrieval and analysis of an adequate number of lymph nodes is critical for accurate staging of oesophageal and gastric cancer. Higher total node counts reported by pathologists are associated with improved survival. A prospective study was undertaken to understand the factors contributing to variability in lymph node counts after oesophagogastric cancer resections and to determine whether a novel strategy of ex vivo dissection of resected specimens into nodal stations improves node counts reported by pathologists. METHODS: The study involved 88 patients with potentially curable oesophagogastric cancer undergoing radical resection. Lymph node counts were obtained from pathology reports and analysed in relation to multiple variables including the introduction of ex vivo dissection of nodal stations in theatre. RESULTS: Higher lymph node counts were obtained with ex vivo dissection of nodal stations (median 19 versus 8, P < 0.01). Node counts also varied significantly with the reporting pathologist (median range 4 to 48, P = 0.02) which was independent of the level of experience of the pathologist (P = 0.67). Node counts were not affected by patient age (P = 0.26), gender (P = 0.50), operative approach (P = 0.50) or neoadjuvant therapy (P = 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: Specimen handling is a significant factor in determining lymph node yield following radical oesophageal and gastric cancer resections. Ex vivo dissection of resected specimens into nodal stations improves node counts without alterations to surgical techniques. Ex vivo dissection should be considered routine.

Outcomes of revision laparoscopic gastric banding: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a health problem approaching pandemic proportions. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is the bariatric procedure of choice in Australia for effective surgical treatment of severe obesity. Complications of LAGB lead to a high proportion of patients requiring revision surgery. However, literature regarding outcomes and failure rates of revision bariatric surgery is scarce, such that the choice of procedure at reoperation remains controversial. This paper aims to present outcomes of revision laparoscopic gastric banding. METHODS: One hundred eighty-three consecutive revision LAGB procedures were performed in 163 patients between March 1998 and July 2009. Patients were followed up for a median period of 36 months. Weight change in terms of body mass index (BMI) and percentage excess weight loss (%EWL), morbidity and patient tolerance were examined. RESULTS: The average reduction in BMI from the primary LAGB procedure was 8.45 kg/m(2) , equivalent to a %EWL of 50.55. BMI of patients who underwent revision LAGB appears to remain stable, with mean change of +0.25 kg/m(2) (%EWL 45.76, P = 0.5) at 3 years and -1.59 (%EWL 51.52, P = 0.12) at 5 years. The overall complication rate of revision LAGB was 13.7%, most commonly recurrent gastric pouch dilatation. CONCLUSIONS: Revision LAGB is reasonably well tolerated by most patients. Preliminary outcome data indicate that revision gastric banding does not result in further weight loss in patients who have lost weight from primary banding, but does maintain the weight loss achieved.

Laparoscopic repair of iatrogenic colonic perforation.

Perforation of the colon during colonoscopy can occur for a variety of reasons. When it is caused directly by the endoscope itself, operative intervention is virtually unavoidable. Current practice is laparotomy and repair or resection. Simple oversewing of the defect in a well-prepared colon is safe and effective if the diagnosis is made early. This can be carried out by the laparoscopic route; however, there are few cases of this being performed. We describe our technique for laparoscopic repair here, reviewing the literature on perforation and its management. With advanced laparoscopic techniques such as intracorporeal suturing becoming more widely practiced, a mind shift toward considering laparoscopy for treatment of these patients should be made. Laparoscopy does not exclude the conversion to laparotomy if required.

Extrahepatic biliary anatomy at laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is aberrant anatomy important?

BACKGROUND: The prevention of major duct injury at cholecystectomy relies on the accurate dissection of the cystic duct and artery, and avoidance of major adjacent biliary and vascular structures. Innumerable variations in the anatomy of the extrahepatic biliary tree and associated vasculature have been reported from radiographical and anatomical studies, and are cited as a potential cause of bile duct injury at cholecystectomy. METHODS: A photographic study of the dissected anatomy of 186 consecutive cholecystectomies was undertaken and each photo analysed to assess the position of the cystic duct and artery, the common bile duct and any anomalous structures. RESULTS: The anatomy in the region of the gallbladder neck was relatively constant. Anatomical variations were uncommon and anomalous ducts were not seen. Vascular variations were the only significant abnormalities found in the present series. CONCLUSION: Anatomy in the region of the gallbladder neck varies mostly in vascular patterns. Aberrant ducts or duct abnormalities are rarely seen during cholecystectomy hightlighting the principle that careful dissection and identification is the key to safe cholecystectomy.