Early versus delayed cholecystectomy in biliary pancreatitis: Experience from a Local Acute Care Surgery Unit in Saudi Arabia.

Biliary pancreatitis is a common complication of gallstones. Although most patients experience mild disease, around 20% may develop severe pancreatitis with an increased risk of serious complications during recurrent attacks. The objective of our study is to compare the surgical outcomes and length of stay for early versus delayed cholecystectomy, performed within the same admission, for mild pancreatitis in a Saudi tertiary center with an established Acute Care Surgey Unit. This retrospective cohort study included all patients who underwent cholecystectomy during the index admission for biliary pancreatitis between January 2017 and January 2020. Surgical outcomes and hospital length of stay were collected and analyzed to assess overall outcomes for early and delayed cholecystectomy groups. The early group was defined as surgery performed within 72 hours of presentation. Eighty-six patients were included and allocated to the early and delayed cholecystectomy groups. The median length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the early cholecystectomy group (4 days, IQR 3-5) compared to the delayed group (7 days, IQR 6-9) (P < .001). There was no significant difference in operative time and postoperative complications. Early cholecystectomy for mild biliary pancreatitis appears safe and feasible and may result in a shorter hospital stay.

Charlson Comorbidity Index as a Predictor of Difficult Cholecystectomy in Patients With Acute Cholecystitis.

Background The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) has been validated as a predictor of overall survival and post-surgical mortality. CCI is adopted by Tokyo Guidelines as one of the main criteria in the management of acute cholecystitis. Our study evaluates the role of CCI in predicting difficult cholecystectomy.  Methods All patients who underwent cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis between January 2017 and September 2019 were included. CCI, Emergency Surgery Score (ESS), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score were calculated and analyzed to assess their predictive value for difficult cholecystectomy. Results A total of 96 patients were included and allocated to difficult and non-difficult cholecystectomy groups. CCI was found to be a significant predictor of difficult cholecystectomy (OR 1.59; 59% CI, 1.04. 2.42; p= 0.031). Similarly, ESS was found to be a predictor tool of difficult cholecystectomy (OR 1.42; 59% CI, 1.05. 1.93; p= 0.024). There was no significant difference in adverse outcomes between the two groups. Conclusion CCI was able to predict a difficult cholecystectomy in our study population. However further studies are required to evaluate if it can be used as a predictor of adverse outcomes in the context of acute cholecystitis.

The Emergency surgery score (ESS) accurately predicts outcomes of emergency surgical admissions at a Saudi academic health center.

BACKGROUND: The emergency surgery score (ESS) has emerged as a tool to predict outcomes in emergency surgery (EGS) patients. Our study examines the ability of ESS to predict outcomes in EGS admissions. METHODS: All EGS admissions to King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC) from January 2017 to October 2019 were included. ESS was calculated for each patient. Correlations between ESS and 30-day mortality and complications were evaluated. RESULTS: 1607 patients were included. 30-day mortality rate was 2.2% while complication rate was 18.7%. Mortality increased as ESS increased, from 0.3% for ESS≤2, to 30.1% for ESS >10, with a c-statistic of 0.88. Complication rates were 2.2%, 40%, and 100% at ESS of 0, 6, and 15, respectively, with a c-statistic of 0.82. CONCLUSIONS: ESS accurately predicted outcomes at our tertiary center. ESS could be useful in identifying high risk EGS admissions and in benchmarking quality of care across Saudi institutions.

Is it safe to use frova airway intubating device during tracheal intubation in difficult airway patient with multiple and chest trauma?

Traumatic chest injury is one of the leading causes of death in motor vehicle accident (MVA). A complete tracheobronchial injury occurred in 1% of trauma cases and most of the cases died before arrival to the emergency department. We report a 37-year-old female involved in MVA presented to the emergency room (ER) with normal vital signs. Ten minutes later, her saturation dropped to 75%, which required ventilation; however, two attempts for endotracheal intubation failed. The third time frova airway intubating introducer used and succeeded. Immediately after tracheal intubation, the patient started to have extensive subcutaneous emphysema and severe hypoxia; chest X-ray showed right side tension pneumothorax which was not relieved by a chest tube insertion. Bronchoscopy confirmed total transection of the right main bronchus and lower tracheal laceration and injury. Emergency thoracotomy and repair of both trachea and the right main bronchus were successful.

Carotid artery angioplasty and stenting: introduction of a new technique into an established vascular surgery center.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to review our initial experience with the introduction of carotid artery angioplasty and stenting as a treatment for carotid stenosis in high-risk patients and compare clinical outcomes to carotid endarterectomy patients treated over the same time period at our center. METHODS: A total of 265 carotid revascularization procedures (45 carotid artery angioplasty and stenting and 220 carotid endarterectomy) were performed over 3 years period. In the carotid artery angioplasty and stenting group, 93% were at high risk according to the current reporting standards. Death, neurological events, and restenosis rates were compared at 30 days and at most recent follow-up. RESULTS: Mean follow-up for all patients was 18 months (range 0-48 months). Carotid artery angioplasty and stenting group had higher cardiac risk than carotid endarterectomy group (13% vs 2%, P < .05). High-risk carotid lesions were present in 67% of carotid artery angioplasty and stenting patients. There was a tendency toward higher restenosis rate in carotid artery angioplasty and stenting than in carotid endarterectomy patients (35% vs 15%, P = .06). Combined stroke and death was higher in the carotid stenting group (4% and 9%) compared to the carotid endarterectomy group (0.5% and 0.5%) at 30 days and at late follow-up, respectively (P = .04 and .00). CONCLUSION: Restenosis and stroke were observed more frequently in our initial experience in patients undergoing carotid artery angioplasty and stenting compared with carotid endarterectomy patients during the same time period. These differences disappeared in high-risk patients. Further studies, to evaluate the effect of the learning curve on early results as well as follow-up for intermediate and long-term durability of carotid artery angioplasty and stenting in high-risk patients, are required.