Old male living renal transplant recipients more likely to be at risk for colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The development of posttransplant malignancy is a well-recognized complication of kidney transplantation due to immunosuppressive therapy. The literature on colorectal malignancy in living renal transplant recipients are limited; most of the data have been collected from deceased donor cases. As living kidney donation is now growing, we sought to define the characteristics and pattern of gastrointestinal malignancy among this group. METHODS: This cross-sectional, multicenter study analyzed the incidence and characteristics of colorectal malignancy among 17 patients with gastrointestinal malignancy after living donor renal transplantation between 1985 and 2009 in Iran. We observed a new-onset, biopsy-proven colorectal malignancy in eight patients of mean age 49.6±10.3 years (range=27-60) at transplantation time and a mean age of 61.1±8.6 years (range=53.4-78.6) at cancer diagnosis. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence rate of colorectal malignancy of 0.03% was restricted to the male gender (100%), all of whom had functioning grafts. The mean period from transplantation to diagnosis was 99.7±10.4 months (range=5-284). The majority of the recipients were aged more than 50 years (n=5) and the most frequent immunosuppressive drug was azathioprine (n=5); none had received antithymocyte globulin/antilymphocyte globulin. It was mostly a late-onset malignancy with 50% of recipients presenting beyond 5 years from transplantation. They were followed for a mean of 9.2±2.4 (range=6-12) months after cancer diagnosis with three patients having succumbed within 9 months. CONCLUSION: Due to the long latency after transplantation and the poor outcomes of colorectal malignancy these patients require long-term screening tests for early detection and due to their poor outcomes a new therapeutic approach.

The impact of hepatitis B infection on outcome of kidney transplantation: a long-term study.

BACKGROUND: With the success of kidney transplantation, liver disease has emerged as an important cause of morbidity and mortality in kidney recipients. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection on patients and graft survival in both short- and long-terms. METHODS: 99 renal transplant patients infected with HBV on follow-up in two major transplant centers were included in a retrospective study. These patients were grafted between 1986 and 2005 and divided into two groups: (1) those only positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and (2) those who were also positive for hepatitis C virus antibodies (HCV Ab). RESULTS: There were 88 patients with HBsAg(+) and 11 with both HBsAg(+) and HCV Ab(+). The mean±SD age of patients was 38.8±13.2 years, and the median follow-up after transplantation was 19 months. Although not significant, the allograft survival rate in the first group (HBV(+)) was better compared to that in the second group (HBV(+) and HCV(+)); 1, 5 and 10 years graft survival rates were 91, 77 and 62 in the first group and 70, 56 and 28 in the second group, respectively (P=0.07). The overall mortality was 5% (4 of 88) in the first and 27% (3 of 11) in the second group (P=0.02). CONCLUSION: Renal allograft recipients with HBV and HCV infections has a poor survival rate compared to patients with only HBV infection. However, there is no significant difference in terms of renal graft survival between the two groups.

The cost of kidney transplantation in Iran.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation has gained widespread popularity by improving the outcome of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. However, this is a highly complicated and expensive procedure that puts much pressure on the health system in developing countries. We report the costs in Iran model of kidney transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the regulations for kidney transplantation using Dialysis and Transplant Patients Association (DATPA) information, 2005. All data regarding the cost of transplantation procedure, immunosuppression, and the money given to donors were included. The cost of transplantation procedure was categorized into personnel, drugs, paraclinics, hospital bed, and other expenses. To achieve more comprehensive results, all costs were converted into US dollars (1 USD = 9000 Rials). RESULTS: The total cost of kidney transplantation procedure was $9224. Of this, 65.8% ($6076) was related to the immunosuppression therapy in the first year, 22.2% ($2048) to the transplantation procedure, and 12% ($1100) to organ procurement. The details of donor nephrectomy were as follows: personnel, $183; accommodations, $107; drugs, $39; paraclinics, $23; and other, $22. These values for kidney recipient were personnel, $331; drugs, $367; paraclinics, $278; accommodations, $475; and other, $222. CONCLUSION: Compared with other countries, the kidney transplantation cost is low in Iran. The health system also pays for all the expenses. These, along with full medical insurance coverage of kidney recipients, make kidney transplantation available for every patient, regardless of the socioeconomic status due to its low cost. It is expected that a higher number of transplantation candidates with a low socioeconomic status will select transplantation.

Pain affects health-related quality of life in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is prevalent in end-stage renal disease patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis. We do not fully know the intensity of chronic pain experienced by kidney recipients in comparison to those on chronic hemodialysis and healthy controls. Moreover, the effect of chronic pain on kidney recipients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is yet to be comprehensively addressed. We designed this study to find an answer to these questions. METHODS: In this case control study, we studied 205 kidney recipients, 69 hemodialysis patients, and 100 healthy controls, who were matched for age, sex, monthly family income, and educational level. The patients were evaluated for the intensity of chronic pain by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). HRQoL was measured with Short Form 36 (SF-36) in the kidney recipients. Chronic pain intensity was compared in the study groups, and in the kidney recipients the correlation between SF-36 subscores and severity of pain was assessed. RESULTS: Severity of pain in the kidney recipients was lower than the hemodialysis patients, but more than the healthy controls (P=.001). The VAS pain score negatively correlated with the scores of SF- 36 total (r=-.329, P=01), mental health (r=-.190, P=07), physical health (r=-.275, P=.001), physical function (r=-.339, P=.001), role limitation due to physical problems (r=-.478, P=.001), role limitation due to emotional problems (r=-.326, P=.001), and bodily pain (r=-.894, P=.001). DISCUSSION: The intensity of chronic pain experienced by the kidney recipients is less than that experienced by patients under chronic hemodialysis, but higher than healthy subjects. Focusing on chronic pain as a cause of post-renal transplantation morbidity is expected to improve post-renal transplantation quality of life.

Renal allograft accumulation of technetium-99m sulfur colloid as a predictor of graft rejection.

Differentiation between rejection (the most common cause) and many other possibilities for detrimental effects on graft function represents a difficult issue to diagnose the cause of renal allograft dysfunction. This study was designed to determine whether technetium-99m sulfur colloid (TSC) accumulation predicted graft rejection. We prospectively studied 54 episodes of allograft dysfunction in 53 kidney transplant recipients who underwent TSC scintiscanning and graft biopsy. Visual analysis of TSC uptake compared uptake, in the allograft with that in the marrow of the fifth lumbar vertebra (L5). A 3+ result meant that allograft uptake was greater than L5 marrow uptake; 2+, the same; 1+, less and finally 0, no allograft uptake. Transplant accumulation of 2+ or more was considered consistent with rejection (P = .01). Allograft biopsies interpreted based on the Banff Working Classification showed rejection in 45 of 54 renal biopsies with 42 the biopsy-proven rejection episodes showing at least 2+ graft uptake. Furthermore, this nuclear medicine technique had a sensitivity of 93.3%, a specificity of 44.4%, a positive predictive value of 89.3%, a negative value of 57.1% and an efficiency of 83.3% for the diagnosis of renal allograft rejection.

Impact of Ramadan fasting on renal allograft function.

Fasting during the holy month of Ramadan is a religious duty for all healthy adult Muslims. They are only allowed to eat and drink between sunset and dawn. This study was designed to find the effect of Ramadan fasting on allograft function. We prospectively studied 19 kidney transplant recipients who voluntarily chose to fast during Ramadan versus 20 matched recipients, who had not fasted for 3 consecutive years. Data were recorded before, during, and after the fasting month. The mean posttransplant periods in the fasting and control groups were 52.6 +/- 30.3 and 56.6 +/- 30.0 months, respectively. A statistical analysis showed no significant changes in serum creatinine concentrations before and after Ramadan 1.07 +/- 0.24 versus 1.08 +/- 0.22 mg/dL (P > .05) and 1.00 +/- 0.24 versus 1.03 +/- 0.28 mg/dL (P > .05) in fasting and control groups, respectively. The results did not show any adverse effects of fasting in recipients with stable renal function. In conclusion, our study suggests that fasting during the month of Ramadan is safe and has no significant harmful effects on kidney transplant recipients with normal renal function.