Exploring subjective quality-of-life indicators in long-term care facilities: a mixed-methods research protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Improving quality of life has become a priority in the long-term care (LTC) sector internationally. With development and implementation guidance, standardised quality-of-life monitoring tools based on valid, self-report surveys could be used more effectively to benefit LTC residents, families and organisations. This research will explore the potential for subjective quality-of-life indicators in the interRAI Self-Reported Quality of Life Survey for Long-Term Care Facilities (QoL-LTCF). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Guided by the Medical Research Council Framework, this research will entail a (1) modified Delphi study, (2) feasibility study and (3) realist synthesis. In study 1, we will evaluate the importance of statements and scales in the QoL-LTCF by administering Delphi surveys and focus groups to purposively recruited resident and family advisors, researchers, and LTC clinicians, staff, and leadership from international quality improvement organisations. In study 2, we will critically examine the feasibility and implications of risk-adjusting subjective quality-of-life indicators. Specifically, we will collect expert stakeholder perspectives with interviews and apply a risk-adjustment methodology to QoL-LTCF data. In study 3, we will iteratively review and synthesise literature, and consult with expert stakeholders to explore the implementation of quality-of-life indicators. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received approval through a University of Waterloo Research Ethics Board and the Social and Societal Ethics Committee of KU Leuven. We will disseminate our findings in conferences, journal article publications and presentations for a variety of stakeholders.

Integrating a Standardized Self-Report Tool into Geriatric Medicine Practice during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Specialized geriatric services care for older adults (≥ 65 years of age) with dementia and other progressive neurological disorders, frailty, and mental health conditions were provided both virtually and in person during the pandemic. The objective of this study was to implement a software-enabled standardized self-report instrument - the interRAI Check-Up Self-Report - to remotely assess patients. A convergent, mixed-methods research design was employed. Staff found the instrument easy to use and the program-level metrics helpful for planning. Most patients urgently needed a geriatrician assessment (72%) and had moderate to severe cognitive (34%) and functional impairments (34%), depressive symptoms (53%), loneliness (57%), daily pain (32%), and distressed caregivers (46%). Implementation considerations include providing ongoing support and facilitating intersectoral collaboration. The Check Up enhanced the geriatric assessment process by creating a system to track all needs for immediate and future care at both the patient and program level.

The interRAI COVID-19 vulnerability screener: Results of a health surveillance initiative for vulnerable adults in the community during the COVID-19 pandemic.

During the pandemic, the interRAI COVID-19 Vulnerability Screener (CVS) was used to identify community-dwelling older adults or adults with disabilities at risk of negative outcomes and facilitate triage for follow-up with health/social services. The interRAI CVS, a standardized self-report instrument administered virtually by a lay-person, includes COVID-19-related items and psychosocial and physical vulnerability. Our objective was to describe those assessed and identify sub-groups at highest risk of adverse outcomes. Seven community-based organizations in Ontario, Canada, implemented the interRAI CVS. We used descriptive statistics to report results and created a priority indicator for monitoring and/or intervention based on possible COVID-19 symptoms and psychosocial/physical vulnerabilities. We used logistic regression to examine the association between priority level and risk of poor outcomes using fair/poor self-rated health as a proxy measure. The sample included 942 adults assessed (April-November 2020; mean age=79). About 10% of individuals reported potential COVID-19 symptoms and <1% had a positive COVID-19 test/diagnosis. Of those with psychosocial/physical vulnerabilities (73.1%), most common were depressed mood (20.9%), loneliness (21.6%), and limited access to food/medications (7.5%). Overall, 45.7% had a recent doctor or nurse practitioner visit. Odds of fair/poor self-reported health were highest among those who reported both possible symptoms of COVID-19 and psychosocial/physical vulnerabilities (OR 10.9, 95% CI 5.96-20.12) compared to those with neither symptoms nor psychosocial/physical vulnerabilities. The sample represents a population largely unaffected by COVID-19 itself but with identified vulnerabilities. The interRAI CVS allows community providers to stay connected and obtain a better understanding of vulnerable individuals' needs during the pandemic.

Developing the Patient Falls Risk Report: A Mixed-Methods Study on Sharing Falls-Related Clinical Information from Home Care with Primary Care Providers.

If interRAI home care information were shared with primary care providers, care provision and integration could be enhanced. The objective of this study was to co-develop an interRAI-based clinical information sharing tool (i.e., the Patient Falls Risk Report) with a sample of primary care providers. This mixed-methods study employed semi-structured interviews to inform the development of the Patient Falls Risk Report and online surveys based on the System Usability Scale instrument to test its usability. Most of the interview sample (n = 9) believed that the report could support patient care by sharing relevant and actionable falls-related information. However, criticisms were identified, including insufficient detail, clarity, and support for shared care planning. After incorporating suggestions for improvement, the survey sample (n = 27) determined that the report had excellent usability with an overall usability score of 83.4 (95% CI = 78.7-88.2). By prioritizing the needs of end-users, sustainable interRAI interventions can be developed to support primary care.

A Qualitative Exploration of Proactive Falls Prevention by Canadian Primary Care Providers.

Background: Falls are a growing concern in Canada. Primary care providers are well positioned to address falls risk, but international literature suggests that best-practice guidelines are rarely followed. The objective of this study is to explore the perspectives of Canadian primary care providers around falls prevention and identify solutions. Methods: We conducted one-on-one qualitative interviews with a maximum variation sample of nine primary care providers in Ontario (n=8) and Alberta (n=1) in Canada. Data were collected over telephone and in-person at the location of participants choosing. Audio recordings of the interviews were transcribed, then coded and analyzed with the Behaviour Change Wheel theoretical framework. Results: Most participants reported relying on patient self-report, intuition, and reactive approaches to identifying falls risk. Reported barriers to falls prevention included low capability to gather information on patient history, context, and community resources; limited opportunity to manage patient complexity due to time constraints; and challenges with motivating patients to engage in care plans. Reported facilitators included team-based interprofessional care and provider motivation. Conclusions: This study has found that Canadian primary care providers face barriers to identifying and managing falls risk. These barriers may be rooted in primary care culture, structure, and tradition.

Assessments of Heart Failure and Frailty-Related Health Instability Provide Complementary and Useful Information for Home-Care Planning and Prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Health instability, measured with the Changes in Health and End-Stage Disease Signs and Symptoms (CHESS) scale, predicts hospitalizations and mortality in home-care clients. Heart failure (HF) is also common among home-care clients. We seek to understand how HF contributes to the odds of death, hospitalization, or worsening health among new home-care clients, depending on admission health instability. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective cohort study of home-care clients, aged 65 years and older, between January 1, 2010, and March 31, 2015 from Alberta, British Columbia, Ontario, and the Yukon, Canada. We used multistate Markov models to derive adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for transitions to different health instability states, hospitalization, and death. We examined the role of HF and CHESS at 6 months after home-care admission. RESULTS: The sample included 286,232 clients. Those with HF had greater odds of worsening health instability than those without HF. At low-to-moderate admission health instability (CHESS 0-2), clients with HF had greater odds of hospitalization and death than those without HF. Clients with HF and high health instability (CHESS≥3) had slightly greater odds of hospitalization (OR, 1.08; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-1.13) but similar odds of death (OR, 1.024; 95% CI, 0.937-1.120) compared with clients without HF. CONCLUSIONS: Among new home-care clients, a diagnosis of HF predicts death, hospitalization, and worsening health, predominantly among those with low-to-moderate admission health instability. A diagnosis of HF and admission CHESS score provide complementary information to support care planning in this population.