Factors Associated with Acute Injurious Falls in Elderly Hospitalized Patients: A Multicenter Descriptive Study.

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Hospital-Acquired Conditions (CMS-HAC) links Medicare payments to health care quality. Experiencing a serious disability or death associated with a fall in a health care facility based on diagnosis codes has been identified as an opportunity for improvement. Multiple factors contribute to an inpatient fall, including medications that affect cognition in older adults. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the commonly prescribed classes of medications on the CMS-HAC falls and trauma definition in US hospitals in a large inpatient database from 2019 to 2021. METHODS: The authors analyzed data from 835 hospitals in the Vizient Clinical Data Base between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2021, on patients ≥ 65 years of age with CMS-HAC patient falls and trauma codes. Using logistic regression and stepwise Poisson regression analysis, the authors identified demographic, clinical, and hospital-related variables associated with falls meeting the CMS-HAC definition. The top 20 prescribed drug classes in these patients were also identified. RESULTS: Among 11,064,024 patient encounters, 5,978 met the CMS-HAC definition of a serious fall. Patients who experienced a serious fall were significantly more likely to be > 79 years of age (p < 0.001, odds ratio [OR] 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-1.37), have a history of prior falls (p < 0.001, OR 2.30, 95% CI 2.11-2.50), have a code for dementia (p < 0.001, OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.40-1.60), and have higher anticholinergic cognitive burden (ACB) scores (p < 0.001, OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.13-1.14). Specific medication classes associated with CMS-HAC falls were first-generation antihistamines (p < 0.00, OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.09-1.35), second-generation antihistamines (p ≤ 0.001, OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.13-1.19), and atypical antipsychotics (p < 0.001, OR 1.18, CI 1.13-1.29). CONCLUSION: Patients who experience a fall meeting the CMS-HAC fall definition are significantly more likely to have a prior history of falling, dementia, and a higher ACB score. Results from this study may inform future quality improvement work aimed at reducing injurious falls.

Longitudinal Evaluation of a Deprescribing Protocol in Skilled Nursing Facilities.

Objective: To determine whether a deprescribing effort reduced several key classes of medications, and the overall number of medication classes per patient, among long-term residents of skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). Design: Retrospective, longitudinal pre/post evaluation. Data from before and during the implementation of the deprescribing effort (2017 through 2019) were compared with data from the post-intervention year (2020). Setting and Patients: Long-term resident data reported through annual comprehensive reviews conducted at two SNFs located in central New York State between 2017 and 2020 (N = 12,144). Interventions: Multifaceted, interdisciplinary deprescribing effort to reduce medications in SNF residence including clinician education, guideline development, and individual chart reviews began in 2019. Results: The mean number of medications prescribed per resident was lower at both facilities after the intervention (mean = 1.74 at both facilities) versus preintervention (1.90 at Facility 1, 1.86 at Facility 2). Significant decreases were observed in the usage rates for diuretics (-4.2%; P = 0.001), opioids (-3.8%; P = 0.001), and antipsychotics (-2.4%; P = 0.010). The raw antidepressant usage rate increased by 1.5% after the intervention but the change was not significant. Effects were robust to covariate adjustment. Conclusion: A combined, comprehensive approach to deprescribing was associated with a reduction in the overall number of medication classes per resident and in several key classes of medications. Additional research with more data and covariate control is in progress for verification of these findings.

Efficacy and Safety of Megestrol in the Hospitalized Older Person.

Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of megestrol for off-label use in older patients with weight loss. Design Retrospective, nonblinded cohort study. Setting Upstate University Hospital is a 420-bed facility and academic medical center with a level 1 trauma center. Upstate Community Hospital is a 314-bed acute care/hospital/ambulatory care center and long-term care hospital that also provides teaching services. Participants Patients 65 years of age and older without malignancy or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome who were initiated and continued megestrol therapy at the Upstate University hospitals for at least two weeks were included. Of the 1,290 patients initially screened, 16 patients on megestrol were evaluated. An age- and gender-matched control group of 16 patients was utilized for comparison of changes in weight and other variables. Interventions Patients in the megestrol group have received daily doses of megestrol between 160 mg to 800 mg for an average duration of 19 days. Patients in the control group had no history or current use of megestrol utilization. Main Outcome Measurements The primary outcome was an increase in weight. Secondary outcome measures included albumin and thromboembolic events. Changes in weight and albumin were also compared with the control group. Results At a mean duration of 19 days, there was no significant difference in weight gain (0.95 kg, OR = 1.33 [95% CI -1.615-3.527]). Albumin decreased by (0.4 g/dL OR = 0.916 [95% CI 0.12-0.78]) and none of the patients developed a thromboembolic event. Conclusion In older hospitalized patients, megestrol did not increase weight, and did not improve albumin. No thromboembolic events were observed, but this may be because of a limited duration of observation of therapy and the routine use of anticoagulation prophylaxis in the inpatient setting.

Impact of a Clinical Pharmacist Telehealth Service in a Geriatrics Assessment Clinic.

Objective Evaluate the impact of a telepharmacy service at a geriatrics assessment clinic. Design Retrospective, single-center, nonblinded cohort study. Setting Geriatrics assessment clinic. Patients The intervention/pharmacist and the control/no-pharmacist (provider) group included patients new to the clinic 50 years of age or older from over the span of 4 months. Patients who the pharmacist was unable to reach and those who missed appointments with the provider were excluded. Interventions The pharmacist phoned new patients approximately one week prior and one week after their first appointments with a provider. Main Outcome Measure Primary outcome: number of drug-related problems (DRPs) detected by the pharmacist compared with the provider. Secondary outcomes: number of medication history discrepancies, accepted medication-related recommendations, potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) deprescribed, and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) detected. Results In the intervention/pharmacist (n = 204) vs control/no pharmacist (n = 200) groups, the number of DRPs was significantly greater (338 vs 218; P = 0.031) and driven by unnecessary drug therapies, doses too high, ADRs, and drug-drug interactions (230 vs 147, P = 0.045; 37 vs 7, P = 0.010; 36 vs 17, P = 0.023; 32 vs 1, P = 0.003, respectively). The difference in number of recommendations made by the pharmacist vs medication changes made by the provider was significant: 457 vs 319, P < 0.001, respectively. Conclusions The addition of a clinical pharmacist conducting telepharmacy at a geriatrics assessment clinic had a positive impact on patient care as it relates to DRPs, deprescribing PIMs, and optimizing medication adherence.

Rhabdomyolysis associated with phentermine.

PURPOSE: A case of rhabdomyolysis associated with the use of phentermine is reported. SUMMARY: A 32-year-old Caucasian man with a recent history of strenuous exercise sought treatment for significant back, shoulder, and radiating inguinal pain. The patient's home medications included the following, administered orally: esomeprazole, levothyroxine, irbesartan- hydrochlorothiazide, metoprolol succinate, metoclopramide, dicyclomine, oxycodone-acetaminophen, and oxycodone extended-release. He also used testosterone topical gel. During the hospital stay, it was discovered that the patient had been taking phentermine hydrochloride 37.5 mg twice daily, double the recommended dosage, for approximately one week before and on the day his symptoms started. His initial laboratory test values were as follows: troponin I, 17.46 ng/mL; creatine kinase (CK), 114,383 units/L; CK-MB, 745.5 ng/mL; and serum creatinine (SCr), 2.8 mg/dL. The patient was diagnosed with rhabdomyolysis of the left deltoid muscle, shoulder, posterior scapula, and upper thorax and with secondary acute renal failure. The patient's urine output was initially poor and rapidly declined to anuria on day 2 of admission. He received i.v. hydration with 0.45% sodium chloride at an initial rate of 200 mL/hr with 75 meq/L of sodium bicarbonate for urinary alkalinization. He did not require renal replacement therapy, and his urine output began to improve to 0.5 mL/kg/hr on hospital day 5 and was 1.42 mL/kg/hr before discharge. Use of the Naranjo et al. adverse-event probability scale revealed that phentermine was the probable cause of the patient's rhabdomyolysis. CONCLUSION: A 32-year-old man developed rhabdomyolysis after ingesting double the recommended dosage of phentermine for a week in addition to engaging in strenuous activity.

Controversy and conflict in the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure: limited role for nesiritide.

The use of nesiritide for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) has been clouded with controversy since its approval in 2001. Extensive marketing and many review articles have established this drug as a safe and superior product to current standards. However, its safety has been called into question by the results of a meta-analysis, and its superiority of important outcomes (length of stay, mortality, decreased readmission rate) has never been proved by a randomized trial against agents with similar vasodilator properties (e.g., nitroglycerin). A review of the available literature on nesiritide in the areas of mortality, renal effects, retrospective studies, use in off-label indications, length of stay, and mortality is presented and illustrates why its use should be limited or even eliminated. After review of this article, the reader should be able to answer the question--if nesiritide had never been approved for use in patients with ADHF, would we have missed it?--with a negative reply.

West Nile virus infection.

PURPOSE: The epidemiology, virology, and transmission of West Nile virus (WNV) are reviewed, and the clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of WNV infection are examined. SUMMARY: WNV infection is caused by a flavivirus transmitted from birds to humans through the bite of culicine mosquitoes. WNV was discovered in the blood of a febrile woman from Uganda's West Nile province in 1937. The first case of domestically acquired WNV infection was reported in the United States in 1999 in New York. Since then, WNV infection has spread rapidly across the United States, with 9306 confirmed cases and 210 deaths reported from 45 states in 2003. It is still not clear how WNV was introduced into North America. WNV is a small, single-stranded RNA virus and a member of the Japanese encephalitis virus antigenic complex. While most humans infected with WNV are asymptomatic, some may develop an influenza-like illness. Disease surveillance remains the cornerstone for the early recognition and control of WNV. We describe one case of WNV infection with an update on the disease. Strategies for the prevention and control of this infection are reviewed. CONCLUSION: There is no established treatment for WNV infection. Currently, prevention and control are the only measures that help decrease the morbidity and mortality associated with WNV infection. As the number of cases escalates and the geographic distribution of WNV infection widens, the epidemic will continue to pose a major challenge to clinicians in the coming years. There is an urgent need for more research on the pathogenesis and treatment of WNV infection.

Smallpox: clinical features, prevention, and management.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a general overview of smallpox, clinical presentation, diagnosis, adverse events, and management of both pre- and postexposure vaccination. DATA SOURCES: Literature was identified by search of MEDLINE (1966-June 2003) and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1966-May 2003) databases using the key terms smallpox, bioterrorism, biological warfare, and smallpox vaccine. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Articles identified from data sources were evaluated, and relevant information was included in this review. DATA SYNTHESIS: Smallpox is spread by human-to-human contact with an infected host and therefore can be contagious. The mortality rate for smallpox is approximately 30%. While the disease was completely eradicated by 1980 with successful use of smallpox vaccine, concern has been raised that smallpox may emerge as a tool of bioterrorism. This concern, combined with the reality of current smallpox vaccination programs in the military and selected civilian populations, mandates a clear understanding of vaccination-related adverse events and contraindications by all healthcare professionals. The vaccine may cause moderate to severe adverse events such as eczema vaccinatum, progressive vaccinia, and generalized vaccinia. CONCLUSIONS: The balance between the risks and benefits of mass vaccination in prevention of an epidemic is not clear. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has established a guideline for appropriate use of smallpox vaccine in the civilian population.

Science or fiction: use of nesiritide as a first-line agent?

Nesiritide is an effective agent for the treatment of decompensated CHF. However, the VMAC trial shows that the agent's efficacy and safety are actually more similar than dissimilar to those of nitroglycerin. Indeed, objective reviews have placed nesiritide as a second-line agent behind current standard drug therapy. Finally, nesiritide is approximately 40 times the purchase price of standard agents such as nitroglycerin. For these reasons, we feel that nesiritide should not be considered as first-line therapy. Reflecting this notion, one institution has implemented a protocol that recommends administration of nitroglycerin and intravenous diuretics (using > or = 2 times the usual daily diuretic dose) before using nesiritide. In light of the existing data, we feel that this approach appears to be an appropriate and prudent one for nesiritide's place in therapy.