Eyebrow and Eyelash Loss in Patients With Cancer.

Though it is widely acknowledged that cancer treatments cause hair loss on the scalp, there are limited data on how they affect eyebrow and eyelash hairs. Patients with eyebrow and eyelash loss, or madarosis, seek various treatment options ranging from camouflage techniques with makeup, permanent tattoos, and prescription medications. Though not yet studied in patients with cancer-induced madarosis, techniques such as scalp cooling, cryotherapy, and topical vasoconstrictors are promising preventative options. More robust research is needed to improve both the quality and quantity of available treatment and preventative options. There is a clear need for dermatologists to play a role in supportive oncodermatology for patients who experience eyebrow and eyelash loss secondary to chemotherapy, endocrine therapies, and radiation therapy. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(5):327-331. doi:10.36849/JDD.8003.

Characterization of the role of Facebook groups for patients who use scalp cooling therapy: a survey study.

Since the emergence of scalp cooling therapy (SCT) for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA), support groups on social media platforms for interested patients have surfaced. Though there are over 20,000 active members across SCT Facebook groups, little is known about how members use this platform. A 23-question survey was posted in five scalp cooling Facebook groups, reaching 219 women. Results indicated that these Facebook groups play clear roles in providing the following: (1) a supportive community for patients, (2) instructions for SCT use, (3) advice regarding insurance coverage and reimbursement, and (4) recommendations for over-the-counter products for hair loss. Despite reported interest in hair loss products, only 5% of patients sought medical treatment from dermatologists. Due to group-specific access restrictions, private Facebook groups provide patients with a protected platform to learn more about SCT from both those with personal experience and SCT company specialists. Providers may consider recommending these online groups to interested patients during the scalp cooling counseling process. As patients with CIA express a growing interest in over-the-counter hair, eyebrow, and eyelash products, it is important for dermatologists to be aware of where their patients obtain recommendations, and further, if these recommendations have clinical evidence of efficacy.

Cosmetic considerations after breast cancer treatment.

Treatments for breast cancer can have an array of adverse effects, including hair loss, scarring, and irritated skin. These physical outcomes can, in turn, lead to body image concerns, anxiety, and depression. Fortunately, there is growing evidence that certain cosmetic therapies can improve patient self-image. Here we review various cosmetic treatment options including hair camouflage, eyebrow and eyelash camouflage, treatments for hirsutism, nipple and areola tattooing, post-mastectomy scar tattooing, treatments for dry skin/xerosis, removal of post-radiation telangiectasias, and lightening of post-radiation hyperpigmentation. For each patient concern, we report potential procedures, clinical evidence of impact on quality of life, special considerations, and safety concerns. This article aims to equip dermatologists with resources so that they may effectively counsel breast cancer survivors who express treatment-related cosmetic concerns.

Factors influencing scalp cooling discussions and use at a large academic institution: a single-center retrospective review.

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA) is a stigmatizing and psychologically devasting side effect of cancer treatment. Scalp cooling therapy (SCT) is the most effective method to reduce CIA, yet it is underutilized. We investigated factors that may impact scalp cooling discussion and use. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of cancer patients from 2000 to 2019 who had documentation of SCT discussion in the electronic medical record. The University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center registry was used to identify the total number of cancer patients eligible for SCT during 2015-2019. Chi-square tests were used for outcome and patient characteristic comparisons (p < 0.05). RESULTS: From 2000 to 2019, 194 patients had documentation of SCT discussion. Of those, 72 (43.6%) used SCT, 93 (47.9%) did not use SCT, and the remaining 29 (17.8%) had unknown SCT use. A total of 5615 cancer patients were eligible for SCT from 2015 to 2019. As compared to those who did not have documented SCT discussions, patients who had documentation of SCT discussions in that period (n = 161, 3.0%) were more likely to be female, have breast cancer, be less than 45 years old, and live in a zip code with average income > US $100,000 (all p < 0.0001). Between 2015 and 2019, 57 patients (1.02%) used SCT. On univariate analysis, patient-initiated conversation about SCT (p = 0.01) and age less than 65 (p = 0.03) were significantly associated with decision to use SCT. CONCLUSION: There were distinctions in the types of patients who have documented discussions about SCT. Improving patient knowledge about the availability of SCT and increasing access to this technology for all eligible cancer patients may enable more patients to achieve improved quality of life by reducing or preventing CIA.

Relations between protective traits and psychological distress among women experiencing infertility.

The aim of this study was to examine the association between traits associated with adaptive self-management and psychological distress in women experiencing infertility. A sample of 326 women reported on their infertility experience; their tendencies with respect to self-compassion, emotion regulation, and positivity; and their current psychological distress. Results showed negative associations of self-compassion and positive orientation with depression in the past month. The additional distress experienced by women with primary infertility was attenuated by self-compassion and the tendency to not suppress emotional expression. Traits that enable effective self-management buffer the effects of infertility on psychology health.

Patch/plaque mycosis-fungoides-like presentations of DUSP22-translocated T-cell lymphomas.

The DUSP22-IRF4 gene rearrangement results in downregulation of DUSP22, a presumed tumor suppressor in T-cell lymphomagenesis. It has been described in some cases of primary cutaneous and systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma, lymphomatoid papulosis, and transformed mycosis fungoides. Here we describe two patients with clinical lesions resembling patch/plaque mycosis fungoides that did not meet WHO criteria for large-cell transformation on histopathology yet showed a DUSP22 translocation. One patient who had a history of systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma with DUSP22 translocation presented with cutaneous involvement by his systemic lymphoma along with lymphomatoid papulosis and mycosis-fungoides-like lesions, all showing an identical immunophenotype and T-cell clone. These cases expand the spectrum of DUSP22-rearranged lymphomas to include mycosis-fungoides-like presentations without large-cell transformation.

Identifying Barriers and Facilitators to Scalp Cooling Therapy Through a National Survey of the Awareness, Practice Patterns, and Attitudes of Oncologists.

PURPOSE: Scalp cooling therapy (SCT) is the most effective method to reduce chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA), a highly distressing side effect of cancer treatment. Despite data supporting SCT efficacy and safety, SCT use in the United States is not widespread. Oncologists' interactions with scalp cooling were examined to identify facilitators and barriers to SCT implementation. METHODS: A 33-question survey was distributed through the ASCO Research Survey Pool to a nationally representative, random sample of 600 oncology providers. Outcome measures included knowledge of SCT, frequency of initiating conversations about SCT with patients, degree of support, and barriers for SCT. Significance was defined as P < .001. RESULTS: Of 155 (25.8%) responding providers, 62% of providers were in favor of SCT always or most of the time, but only 26% reported initiating discussions about SCT always or most of the time. Providers who treat breast cancer (P ≤ .0001), those who report being very familiar with SCT (P ≤ .0001), those who report having read SCT literature in the past 2 years (P ≤ .0001), and those who work at a facility with machine SCT (P ≤ .0001) were significantly more likely to initiate conversations with patients about SCT. Financial concerns (58%) were the primary reason for not recommending SCT use; efficacy (31%), staff or facility (24%), and safety (15%) concerns were also noted. Although safety concerns have decreased markedly over time, 14% of providers report patients who continue to express these concerns and 17% of providers see safety issues as barriers to supporting SCT. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that oncology provider familiarity and experience with SCT lead to increased support for scalp cooling, which may ultimately result in greater availability and utilization of SCT when indicated.