Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Transpl Int ; 29(4): 464-70, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26706618

ABSTRACT

A steroid-free protocol for ABO-compatible renal transplantation has been used at our center since 1983. To minimize the adverse effects of steroids, we also developed a steroid sparing protocol for ABO-incompatible renal transplantation in 2008. The present study is a report of our results. A retrospective review of the first 50 ABO-incompatible renal transplantations performed at a single university center. If no immunological events occurred in the post-transplant period, prednisolone tapering was initiated approximately 3 months after transplantation. Forty-three patients completed prednisolone tapering after 289 ± 58 days. Three patients died during follow-up, and four patients lost graft function. None of these adverse events were rejection related. Eleven patients experienced rejections; seven were on prednisolone and four were after weaning from prednisolone. All patients responded well to antirejection treatment. Overall, 1-year rejection rate was 19%. One- and 3-year graft survival was 94% and 91%, respectively. One-year post-transplant median serum creatinine was 123 µmol/L. We found acceptable rejection rates, graft survival, and creatinine levels in patients undergoing ABO-incompatible renal transplantations with a steroid sparing protocol. However, a longer follow-up of a lager cohort is needed before firm conclusions can be made.


Subject(s)
ABO Blood-Group System , Blood Group Incompatibility , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Renal Insufficiency/blood , Renal Insufficiency/surgery , Steroids/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Antibodies/blood , Biopsy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Graft Rejection , Graft Survival , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Prednisolone/administration & dosage , Prednisolone/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Steroids/adverse effects , Tacrolimus/administration & dosage , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
2.
PLoS One ; 10(6): e0126882, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26030651

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Little is known about the tolerability of antihypertensive drugs during hemodialysis treatment. The present study evaluated the use of the angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) irbesartan. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, one-year intervention trial. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-two hemodialysis patients with urine output >300 mL/day and dialysis vintage <1 year. INTERVENTION: Irbesartan/placebo 300 mg/day for 12 months administered as add-on to antihypertensive treatment using a predialytic systolic blood pressure target of 140 mmHg in all patients. OUTCOMES AND MEASUREMENTS: Cardiac output, stroke volume, central blood volume, total peripheral resistance, mean arterial blood pressure, and frequency of intradialytic hypotension. RESULTS: At baseline, the groups were similar regarding age, comorbidity, blood pressure, antihypertensive medication, ultrafiltration volume, and dialysis parameters. Over the one-year period, predialytic systolic blood pressure decreased significantly, but similarly in both groups. Mean start and mean end cardiac output, stroke volume, total peripheral resistance, heart rate, and mean arterial pressure were stable and similar in the two groups, whereas central blood volume increased slightly but similarly over time. The mean hemodynamic response observed during a dialysis session was a drop in cardiac output, in stroke volume, in mean arterial pressure, and in central blood volume, whereas heart rate increased. Total peripheral resistance did not change significantly. Overall, this pattern remained stable over time in both groups and was uninfluenced by ARB treatment. The total number of intradialytic hypotensive episodes was (placebo/ARB) 50/63 (P = 0.4). Ultrafiltration volume, left ventricular mass index, plasma albumin, and change in intradialytic total peripheral resistance were significantly associated with intradialytic hypotension in a multivariate logistic regression analysis based on baseline parameters. CONCLUSION: Use of the ARB irbesartan as an add-on to other antihypertensive therapy did not significantly affect intradialytic hemodynamics, neither in short nor long-term, and no significant increase in hypotensive episodes was seen. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00791830.


Subject(s)
Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/pharmacology , Biphenyl Compounds/pharmacology , Hemodynamics/drug effects , Receptor, Angiotensin, Type 2/metabolism , Renal Dialysis , Tetrazoles/pharmacology , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Hypotension/drug therapy , Hypotension/physiopathology , Irbesartan , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Placebos , Time Factors
3.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 64(6): 892-901, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25011693

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) declines during long-term dialysis treatment. In peritoneal dialysis, blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system reduces GFR decline. Observational studies suggest that similar treatment may preserve kidney function in hemodialysis (HD). STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial, with 1-year follow-up. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Adult HD patients with urine output >300mL/24h, HD vintage less than 1 year, and cardiac ejection fraction >30%. Patients were included from 6 HD centers. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to placebo or the angiotensin II receptor blocker irbesartan, 300mg daily. Target systolic blood pressure (BP) was 140mm Hg. OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcomes were change in GFR measured as the mean of creatinine and urea renal clearance together with urine volume. Secondary outcomes were change in albuminuria, renin-angiotensin II-aldosterone hormone plasma levels, and time to anuria. RESULTS: Of 82 patients randomly assigned (41 patients in each group), 56 completed 1 year of treatment. The placebo and irbesartan groups were comparable at baseline in terms of sex balance (26 vs 30 men), mean age (62 vs 61 years), median HD vintage (137 vs 148 days), mean HD time (10 vs 11h/wk), median urine volume (1.19 vs 1.26L/d), and mean GFR (4.8 vs 5.7mL/min/1.73m(2)). The target BP level was reached in both groups and BP did not differ significantly between groups over time. Adverse-event rates were similar. GFR declined by a mean of 1.7 (95% CI, 1.2-2.3) and 1.8 (95% CI, 1.1-2.4) mL/min/1.73m(2) per year in the placebo and irbesartan groups, respectively. Mean difference (baseline values minus value at 12 months) between groups was -0.0 (95% CI, -0.8 to 0.8). In each group, 4 patients became anuric. LIMITATIONS: GFR decline rates were lower than expected, reducing the power. CONCLUSIONS: At equal BP levels, we found that irbesartan treatment did not affect the decline in GFR or urine volume significantly during 1 year of treatment in HD patients. Irbesartan treatment was used safely in the studied population.


Subject(s)
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/therapeutic use , Angiotensins/antagonists & inhibitors , Disease Progression , Kidney/physiology , Renal Dialysis/trends , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , Aged , Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/pharmacology , Angiotensins/physiology , Biphenyl Compounds/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Irbesartan , Kidney/drug effects , Male , Middle Aged , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/physiopathology , Tetrazoles/therapeutic use
4.
5.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 168(19): 1854-6, 2006 May 08.
Article in Danish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16756801

ABSTRACT

Chronic left heart failure is the result of the activation of pathophysiological mechanisms which over time lead to progressive deterioration of the cardiac function. As pharmacotherapy aims at these mechanisms and as treatment possibilities are increasing, we find it relevant to provide a survey. Treatment evidence is based mainly on systolic dysfunction. It consists of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, aldosterone antagonist, beta-blocker, digoxin and diuretics. Incorporation of evidence-based medicine and treatment of diastolic dysfunction should be focussed on in the future.


Subject(s)
Cardiotonic Agents/therapeutic use , Heart Failure , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/therapeutic use , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Digoxin/administration & dosage , Diuretics/administration & dosage , Evidence-Based Medicine , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Heart Failure/etiology , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Humans , Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/drug therapy , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/physiopathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...