Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 31
Filter
1.
Pain ; 161(4): 875-876, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32195786

Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid , Pain , Humans
3.
Pain Med ; 19(7): 1469-1477, 2018 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29016951

ABSTRACT

Background: Because an increase of patients who misuse opioids has been identified in our cancer clinical setting through urine drug testing (UDT) and the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patient's with Pain-Short Form (SOAPP-SF), we conducted this retrospective cohort study to identify patient characteristics that are associated with UDT that indicates noncompliance. Methods: Over a two-year period, 167 of 8,727 patients (2.4%) seen in the pain clinic and who underwent UDT were evaluated to determine compliance with prescribed opioid regimens. Descriptive clinical and demographic data were collected, and group differences based on compliance with opioid therapy were evaluated. Results: Fifty-eight percent of the patients were noncompliant with their prescribed opioid therapy. Noncompliant patients were younger than compliant patients, with a median age of 46 vs 49 years (P = 0.0408). Noncompliant patients were more likely to have higher morphine equivalent daily doses; however, the difference was not statistically significant. Patients with a history of alcohol (ETOH) (P = 0.0332), illicit drug use (P = 0.1014), and smoking (P = 0.4184) were more likely noncompliant. Univariate regression analysis showed that a history of ETOH use (P = 0.034), a history of anxiety (P = 0.027), younger age (P = 0.07), and a SOAPP-SF score of 4 or higher (P = 0.05) were associated with an abnormal UDT. Conclusions: History of ETOH use, anxiety, high SOAPP-SF score, and younger age were associated with UDT that indicates noncompliance. Given the very small percentage of UDT testing, it is quite likely that a significant number of patients who did not undergo UDT were also nonadherent with treatment recommendations.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Cancer Pain/drug therapy , Medication Adherence , Pain Management/methods , Substance Abuse Detection/methods , Adult , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Analgesics, Opioid/urine , Cancer Pain/urine , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Clinics/standards , Pain Management/standards , Retrospective Studies , Self Report , Substance Abuse Detection/standards
4.
J Appl Biobehav Res ; 22(4)2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29230086

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The objectives of the study were to (1) assess the extent to which interrater reliability of pain drawing location and dispersion scoring methods are similar across pain disciplines in a sample of patients with cancer treatment-induced neuropathic pain (N = 56) and (2) investigate indicators of validity of the pain drawing in this unique sample. METHODS: Patients undergoing cancer therapy completed the Brief Pain Inventory Body Map, the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory, and the McGill Pain Questionnaire. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients among medical and psychology professionals ranged from .93-.99. Correlations between pain drawing score and symptom burden severity ranged from .29-.39; correlations between pain drawing score and symptom burden interference ranged from .28-.34. Patients who endorsed pain in the hands and feet more often described their pain as electric, numb, and shooting than patients without pain in the hands and feet. They also endorsed significantly more descriptors of neuropathic pain. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest a similar understanding among members of a multidisciplinary pain team as to the location and dispersion of pain as represented by patients' pain drawings. In addition, pain drawing scores were related to symptom burden severity and interference and descriptors of neuropathic pain in expected ways.

5.
Support Care Cancer ; 25(6): 1873-1879, 2017 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28124735

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) and obesity are prevalent in cancer survivors and decrease quality of life; however, the impact of the co-occurrence of these conditions has garnered little attention. This study investigated differences between obese and non-obese cancer survivors with CIPN and predictors of symptom burden and pain. METHODS: Patients with CIPN were administered the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory and a modified version of pain descriptors from the McGill Pain Inventory. Independent t tests assessed group differences between obese and non-obese survivors, and linear regression analyses explored predictors of patient outcomes. RESULTS: Results indicated a significant difference in symptom severity scores for obese (M = 32.89, SD = 25.53) versus non-obese (M = 19.35, SD = 16.08) patients (t(37.86) = -2.49, p = .02). Significant differences were also found for a total number of pain descriptors endorsed by obese (M = 4.21, SD = 3.45) versus non-obese (M = 2.42, SD = 2.69) participants (t(74) = -2.53, p = .01). Obesity was a significant predictor of symptom severity and total pain descriptors endorsed. Other significant predictors included age and months since treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer survivors with CIPN and co-occurring obesity may be more at risk for decreased quality of life through increased symptom severity and pain compared to non-obese survivors. This paper identified risk factors, including obesity, age, and months since treatment, that can be clinically identified for monitoring distress in CIPN patients. Future research should focus on the longitudinal relationship between obesity and CIPN, and robust interventions to address the multifaceted issues faced by cancer survivors.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Neoplasms/complications , Obesity/complications , Pain/etiology , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/chemically induced , Quality of Life/psychology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Survivors
6.
Pain Physician ; 19(6): 397-403, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27454270

ABSTRACT

The effectiveness of splanchnic nerve neurolysis (SNN) for cancer-related abdominal pain has been investigated using numeric pain intensity rating as an outcome variable. The outcome variable in this study used the grid method for obtaining a targeted pain drawing score on 60 patients with pain from pancreatic or gastro-intestinal primary cancers or metastatic disease to the abdominal region. Results demonstrate excellent inter-rater agreement (intra-class correlation [ICC] coefficient at pre-SNN = 0.97 and ICC at within one month post-SNN = 0.98) for the grid method of scoring the pain drawing and demonstrate psychometric generalizability among patients with cancer-related pain. Using the Wilcoxon signed rank test and associated effect sizes, results show significant improvement in dispersion of pain following SNN. Effect sizes for the difference in pre-SNN to 2 post-SNN time points were higher for the pain drawing than for pain intensity rating. Specifically, the effect size difference from pre- to within one month post-SNN was r = 0.42 for pain drawing versus r = 0.23 for pain intensity rating. Based on a smaller subset of patients who were seen within 1 - 6 months following SNN, the effect size difference from pre-SNN was r = 0.46 for pain drawing versus r = 0.00 for pain intensity rating. Collectively, these data support the use of the pain drawing as a reliable outcome measure among patients with cancer pain for procedures such as SNN that target specific location and dispersion of pain.


Subject(s)
Cancer Pain , Splanchnic Nerves , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nerve Block , Pain , Pain Measurement
7.
Pain Physician ; 19(4): 281-92, 2016 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27228515

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Pancreatic and other upper abdominal organ malignancies can produce intense visceral pain syndromes that are frequently treated with splanchnic nerve neurolysis (SNN) or celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN). Although commonly performed with either alcohol or phenol, there is scant literature on the comparative effectiveness, duration of benefit, and complication profile comparing the 2 agents. This study presents a retrospective chart review of 93 patients who underwent SNN for cancer-related abdominal pain in order to describe patient characteristics, examine comparative efficacy, duration of benefit, and incidence of complications with alcohol vs. those of phenol. Consistent with previous studies, SNN reduced reported pain scores while not significantly reducing opioid consumption. No difference in pain outcomes was found comparing alcohol versus phenol based neurolytic techniques. Celiac axis tumor infiltration and pre-procedural local radiation therapy did not change the effectiveness of the procedure. Our data demonstrated that 44.57% of patients had = 30% pain reduction while 43.54% did not have pain reduction. Interestingly, the procedure produced significant improvements in anxiety, depression, difficulty thinking clearly, and feeling of well-being. In addition, no difference in complications was seen between the agents either. SNN was an effective and relatively safe procedure for the treatment of pain associated with pancreatic and other upper abdominal organ malignancies in our sample of patients. Choice of neurolytic agent can appropriately be left to the clinical judgment and local availability of the treating physician. The change in ancillary symptoms has a theoretical basis that supports a biopsychosocial model of pain since changes in one target area (pain) impact other related ones (depression and anxiety). KEY WORDS: Celiac plexus, splanchnic nerves, neurolysis, nerve block, alcohol, ethanol, phenol, pain, cancer pain, abdominal pain, visceral pain, symptom assessment.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Pain/drug therapy , Autonomic Nerve Block/methods , Cancer Pain/drug therapy , Celiac Plexus/drug effects , Ethanol/pharmacology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Phenol/pharmacology , Splanchnic Nerves/drug effects , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Cancer Pain/etiology , Ethanol/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Male , Phenol/administration & dosage , Retrospective Studies
8.
Psychooncology ; 24(11): 1377-83, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25601235

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Depression and reduced quality of life are often reported in patients with upper-extremity lymphedema secondary to breast cancer treatment. Little is known about how pain and body image influence depression in patients with lymphedema. The current study examined the association of pain intensity and body integrity beliefs with depressive symptoms and the extent to which body image dissatisfaction mediated these associations. METHODS: A cross-sectional sample of patients with lymphedema secondary to breast cancer treatment completed self-report questionnaires of pain, body image, and depressive symptoms. Hierarchical regression analyses and tests of mediation were conducted to examine the associations among the variables of interest. RESULTS: Pain intensity and body integrity beliefs were positively associated with depressive symptoms. Further, body image dissatisfaction mediated the relationship between pain and depressive symptoms, indicating that higher levels of pain led to higher states of body image dissatisfaction, which, in turn, led to greater depressive symptoms. Body image dissatisfaction also mediated the relationship between body integrity beliefs and depressive symptoms, suggesting that greater body integrity beliefs led to higher dissatisfaction with one's body and subsequently to greater depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide preliminary evidence that pain intensity and body image are important factors in understanding depressive symptoms in patients with lymphedema. Clinical implications include screening for pain and body image concerns in this population to identify patients who are in distress. Counseling interventions targeting body image dissatisfaction can also be potentially helpful for patients with lymphedema.


Subject(s)
Body Image/psychology , Breast Neoplasms/complications , Depression/epidemiology , Lymphedema/psychology , Pain/psychology , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Lymphedema/etiology , Middle Aged , Pain/diagnosis , Pain Measurement , Personal Satisfaction , Quality of Life , Regression Analysis , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires
9.
Int Psychogeriatr ; 27(7): 1207-15, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25497362

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Quality of life (QOL) is lower in older adults with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). QOL generally improves following cognitive-behavioral treatment for GAD. Little is known, however, about additional variables predicting changes in QOL in older adults with GAD. This study examined predictors of change in QOL among older participants in a randomized clinical trial of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for GAD, relative to enhanced usual care (EUC). METHODS: Hierarchical multilevel mixed-model analyses were used to examine inter-individual and intra-individual factors that predicted QOL over time. Predictors were categorized into treatment, personal and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: QOL improved over time, and there was significant variability between participants in change in QOL. Controlling for treatment condition, baseline general self-efficacy, baseline social support, within-person variation in worry and depression and average levels of depression across different time points predicted changes in QOL. CONCLUSIONS: QOL has increasingly been used as an outcome measure in treatment outcome studies to focus on overall improvement in functioning. Attention to improvement in symptoms of depression and worry, along with psychosocial variables, such as social support and self-efficacy, may help improve QOL in older adults with GAD. This study was a secondary study of data from a randomized clinical trial (NCT00308724) registered with clinical.trials.gov.


Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders/therapy , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Depression/therapy , Quality of Life , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Self Efficacy , Social Support , Treatment Outcome
10.
Curr Opin Support Palliat Care ; 8(2): 117-23, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24690764

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to provide the reader with an up-to-date overview on the biopsychosocial model in cancer pain. RECENT FINDINGS: This review contains articles published from 2012 to 2014, which advance our understanding of biopsychosocial factors related to the cancer pain experience and psychosocial treatment for cancer pain. Greater depression, anxiety, and distress, and lower quality of life are related to greater pain intensity in cancer patients. Recent publications have expanded on this research by examining how psychosocial factors relate to the development of chronic pain conditions after cancer treatment. Recent publications have also advanced our understanding of psychosocial interventions for cancer pain and symptom management. In the last few years, several reviews have emerged, which have found modest effect sizes for psychosocial interventions in cancer pain management. SUMMARY: The biopsychosocial model is a helpful way to comprehensively approach the conceptualization and treatment of pain in cancer patients at all stages of the disease process. We currently have an established base of research on the importance of biopsychosocial model in cancer pain. Our ability to treat patients with cancer pain effectively will improve as we gain a better understanding of which treatments work for which patients.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/complications , Pain Management/methods , Pain Management/psychology , Pain/etiology , Pain/psychology , Age Factors , Complementary Therapies , Depression/psychology , Humans , Neoplasm Staging , Palliative Care , Quality of Life , Social Support , Stress, Psychological/psychology
11.
J Nerv Ment Dis ; 201(5): 414-20, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23588228

ABSTRACT

To increase the sustainability of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) in primary care for late-life anxiety, we incorporated nonexpert counselors, options for telephone meetings, and integration with primary care clinicians. This open trial examines the feasibility, satisfaction, and clinical outcomes of CBT delivered by experienced and nonexperienced counselors for older adults with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Clinical outcomes assessed worry (Penn State Worry Questionnaire), GAD (Generalized Anxiety Disorder Severity Scale), and anxiety (Beck Anxiety Inventory and Structured Interview Guide for Hamilton Anxiety Scale). After 3 months of treatment, Cohen's d effect sizes for worry and anxiety ranged from 0.48 to 0.78. Patients treated by experienced and nonexperienced counselors had similar reductions in worry and anxiety, although treatment outcomes were more improved on the Beck Anxiety Inventory for experienced therapists. Preliminary results suggest that adapted CBT can effectively reduce worry. The piloted modifications can provide acceptable and feasible evidence-based care.


Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders/therapy , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Primary Health Care/methods , Aged , Anxiety/psychology , Anxiety/therapy , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Pilot Projects , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Treatment Outcome
12.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol ; 71(3): 619-26, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23228992

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Chemoneuropathy remains a painful, burdensome complication of cancer treatment for patients receiving a range of chemotherapeutics, yet the cause and persistence of this condition are not fully documented. This study was designed to quantify the longevity of and contributions to neuropathy following treatment with the plant alkaloids paclitaxel and vincristine. METHODS: Quantitative sensory testing was conducted approximately 18 months apart on 14 patients, seven of which had been treated with paclitaxel and seven with vincristine and compared to data from 18 healthy control subjects. In addition, skin biopsies were obtained to investigate changes in the density of Meissner's corpuscles and epidermal nerve fibers (ENFs), the loss of which is thought to contribute to multiple forms of neuropathy. RESULTS: Impairments in motor skills, as measured by a grooved peg-board, were found. Deficits in touch detection were observed using von Frey monofilaments, as were changes in sharpness detection using a weighted needle device. Using a Peltier device, warmth and heat detection were impaired. These deficits were consistent across time. Remarkably, the average length of time patients reported painful neuropathy was over four and a half years. Skin biopsies were found to be deficient in Meissner's corpuscles and ENFs. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of widespread deficits in sensory testing and decreases in skin innervation for cancer patients receiving paclitaxel or vincristine document a persistent polyneuropathy which severely impacts these patients. Decreases in Meissner's corpuscles and ENFs indicate a possible mechanism for the neuropathy.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/adverse effects , Neurotoxicity Syndromes/pathology , Paclitaxel/adverse effects , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/chemically induced , Vincristine/adverse effects , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/therapeutic use , Biopsy , Female , Humans , Male , Mechanoreceptors/drug effects , Middle Aged , Motor Skills/drug effects , Nerve Fibers/pathology , Paclitaxel/therapeutic use , Pain/chemically induced , Pain Measurement/drug effects , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/pathology , Physical Stimulation , Pilot Projects , Sensory Thresholds/drug effects , Skin/innervation , Skin/pathology , Thermosensing/drug effects , Touch/drug effects , Vincristine/therapeutic use
13.
J Pain ; 13(11): 1058-67, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23010143

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Although many cancer patients who have pain are smokers, the extent of their symptom burden and risk for opioid misuse are not well understood. In this study we analyzed records of patients being treated for cancer pain, 94 of whom were smokers and 392 of whom were nonsmokers, to determine smoking status group differences. Smokers had significantly higher pain intensity, fatigue, depression, and anxiety than nonsmokers (independent samples t-tests P < .002). Smokers were at higher risk for opioid misuse based on the short form of the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain (SOAPP). Specifically, smokers had more frequent problems with mood swings, taking medications other than how they are prescribed, a history of illegal drug use, and a history of legal problems (chi-square tests P ≤ .002). Changes in pain and opioid use were examined in a subset of patients (146 nonsmokers and 46 smokers) who were receiving opioid therapy on at least 2 of the 3 data time points (consult, follow-up 1 month after consult, follow-up 6 to 9 months after consult). Results based on multilevel linear modeling showed that over a period of approximately 6 months, smokers continued to report significantly higher pain than nonsmokers. Both smokers and nonsmokers reported a significant decline in pain across the 6-month period; the rate of decline did not differ across smokers and nonsmokers. No significant difference over time was found in opioid use between smokers and nonsmokers. These findings will guide subsequent studies and inform clinical practice, particularly the relevancy of smoking cessation. PERSPECTIVE: This article describes pain, symptom burden, and risk for opioid misuse among cancer patients with pain across smoking status. Smoking appears to be a potential mechanism for having an increased pain and symptom burden and risk for opioid misuse. This improved understanding of cancer pain will inform clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/psychology , Opioid-Related Disorders/psychology , Pain/psychology , Smoking/psychology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Appetite/physiology , Cost of Illness , Crime/psychology , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Fatigue/psychology , Female , Humans , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Mood Disorders/etiology , Mood Disorders/psychology , Neoplasms/complications , Pain/etiology , Pain Management/methods , Pain Measurement , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Smoking/adverse effects , Young Adult
14.
Psychiatry Res ; 199(1): 24-30, 2012 Aug 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22503380

ABSTRACT

The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a widely used, comprehensive self-report measure of sleep quality and impairment, which has demonstrated good psychometric properties within various populations, including older adults. However, the psychometric properties of the PSQI and its component scores have not been evaluated for older adults with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Additionally, changes in PSQI global or component scores have not been reported following cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) of late-life GAD. This study examined (1) the psychometric properties of the PSQI within a sample of 216 elderly primary care patients age 60 or older with GAD who were referred for treatment of worry and/or anxiety; as well as (2) response to CBT, relative to usual care, for 134 patients with principal or coprincipal GAD. The PSQI demonstrated good internal consistency reliability and adequate evidence of construct validity. Those receiving CBT experienced greater reductions in PSQI global scores at post-treatment, relative to those receiving usual care. Further, PSQI global and component scores pertaining to sleep quality and difficulties falling asleep (i.e., sleep latency and sleep disturbances) demonstrated response to treatment over a 12-month follow-up period. Overall, results highlight the usefulness of the PSQI global and component scores for use in older adults with GAD.


Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Psychometrics/statistics & numerical data , Severity of Illness Index , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/diagnosis , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/psychology , Aged , Anxiety Disorders/complications , Anxiety Disorders/therapy , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Depression/complications , Depression/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/statistics & numerical data , Reproducibility of Results , Self Report , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/complications , Social Support , Treatment Outcome
15.
J Nerv Ment Dis ; 199(10): 811-4, 2011 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21964278

ABSTRACT

Response to treatment of late-life generalized anxiety disorder has been defined by a variety of methods, all based on statistically significant reductions in symptom severity. However, it is unknown whether these improvements in symptom severity are associated with meaningful differences in everyday functioning. The current study used four methods to define response to treatment for 115 primary-care patients 60 years and older, with a principal or coprincipal diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder. The methods examined included percentage of improvement, reliable change index, and minimal clinically significant differences. Agreement among classification methods and their associations with general and mental health-related quality of life were assessed. Results indicated moderate agreement among symptom-based classification methods and significant associations with measures of quality of life.


Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders/therapy , Quality of Life/psychology , Aged , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
16.
Pain Physician ; 14(4): E361-71, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21785486

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The growing awareness of opioid abuse and addiction in the chronic pain population, along with increasing cancer survivorship, has heightened our awareness of this potential problem in the cancer patient. An increasing number of patients who abuse opioids have been identified in our clinical setting. OBJECTIVE: We present an algorithm of multidisciplinary care for the treatment of cancer patients at risk for abusing opioids. SETTING: Two illustrative patient examples were identified recently from our clinic. RESULTS: These 2 patient examples demonstrate our multidisciplinary approach to treatment. A discussion of safe prescribing principles adapted from the literature is presented. Also, a brief point of added complexity is introduced; specifically, ethical considerations due to the unique nature of cancer pain. LIMITATIONS: Although validation studies exist for the use of screening tools in patients with chronic noncancer pain, there have been no instrument validation studies on patients with cancer pain. The educational treatment model that we refer to regarding facilitating safe use of opioids also has not been studied on patients with cancer pain. Lastly, we express caution in generalizing our guidelines to patients with noncancer pain. Our patient population differs in the multiple co-existing stressors and symptom burden associated with cancer. CONCLUSIONS: We have become increasingly aware of the problem of opioid abuse in the cancer pain population. With an approach to using safe prescribing principles adapted from chronic pain literature, and an ethically based multidisciplinary approach, clinicians can continue to treat pain successfully in the opioid-misusing cancer patient. We outline our approach in this article.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Interprofessional Relations , Neoplasms/complications , Opioid-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Pain/drug therapy , Substance Abuse Detection/methods , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain/etiology , Risk Assessment/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires
17.
J Clin Psychol Med Settings ; 17(4): 387-400, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21110074

ABSTRACT

Physical illness may precipitate psychological distress among older adults. This study examines whether social support and self-efficacy moderate the associations between physical health and depression and anxiety. Predictions were tested in 222 individuals age 60 or older presenting for help with worry. Physical health was assessed through self-report (subjective) and physical diagnoses (objective). Objective physical health did not have a significant association with depression or anxiety. Worse subjective physical health was associated with increased somatic anxiety, but not with depression or worry. The relationship between subjective physical health and depressive symptoms was moderated by self-efficacy and social support. As predicted, when self-efficacy was low, physical health had its strongest negative association with depressive symptoms such that as physical health improved, depressive symptoms also improved. However, the moderation effect was not as expected for social support; at high levels of social support, worse physical health was associated with increased depressive affect.


Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Health Status , Self Efficacy , Social Support , Activities of Daily Living/psychology , Aged , Aging/psychology , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder/epidemiology , Female , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Geriatric Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/statistics & numerical data , Psychometrics , Surveys and Questionnaires , Texas/epidemiology
18.
JAMA ; 301(14): 1460-7, 2009 Apr 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19351943

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) can be effective for late-life generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), but only pilot studies have been conducted in primary care, where older adults most often seek treatment. OBJECTIVE: To examine effects of CBT relative to enhanced usual care (EUC) in older adults with GAD in primary care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized clinical trial recruiting 134 older adults (mean age, 66.9 years) from March 2004 to August 2006 in 2 primary care settings. Treatment was provided for 3 months; assessments were conducted at baseline, posttreatment (3 months), and over 12 months of follow-up, with assessments at 6, 9, 12, and 15 months. INTERVENTION: Cognitive behavior therapy (n = 70) conducted in the primary care clinics. Treatment included education and awareness, motivational interviewing, relaxation training, cognitive therapy, exposure, problem-solving skills training, and behavioral sleep management. Patients assigned to receive EUC (n = 64) received biweekly telephone calls to ensure patient safety and provide minimal support. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes included worry severity (Penn State Worry Questionnaire) and GAD severity (GAD Severity Scale). Secondary outcomes included anxiety ratings (Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, Beck Anxiety Inventory), coexistent depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory II), and physical/mental health quality of life (12-Item Short Form Health Survey). RESULTS: Cognitive behavior therapy compared with EUC significantly improved worry severity (45.6 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 43.4-47.8] vs 54.4 [95% CI, 51.4-57.3], respectively; P < .001), depressive symptoms (10.2 [95% CI, 8.5-11.9] vs 12.8 [95% CI, 10.5-15.1], P = .02), and general mental health (49.6 [95% CI, 47.4-51.8] vs 45.3 [95% CI, 42.6-47.9], P = .008). There was no difference in GAD severity in patients receiving CBT vs those receiving EUC (8.6 [95% CI, 7.7-9.5] vs 9.9 [95% CI, 8.7-11.1], P = .19). In intention-to-treat analyses, response rates defined according to worry severity were higher following CBT compared with EUC at 3 months (40.0% [28/70] vs 21.9% [14/64], P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with EUC, CBT resulted in greater improvement in worry severity, depressive symptoms, and general mental health for older patients with GAD in primary care. However, a measure of GAD severity did not indicate greater improvement with CBT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00308724.


Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders/therapy , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Primary Health Care , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
19.
Depress Anxiety ; 26(1): E10-5, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18839400

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Generalized Anxiety Disorder Severity Scale (GADSS) is an interview rating scale designed specifically for assessing symptom severity of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), which has demonstrated positive psychometric data in a sample of adult primary care patients with GAD and panic disorder. However, the psychometric properties of the GADSS have not been evaluated for older adults. METHODS: This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the GADSS, administered via telephone, with a sample of older primary care patients (n=223) referred for treatment of worry and/or anxiety. RESULTS: The GADSS demonstrated adequate internal consistency, strong inter-rater reliability, adequate convergent validity, poor diagnostic accuracy, and mixed discriminant validity. CONCLUSIONS: Results provide mixed preliminary support for use of the GADSS with older adults.


Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis , Personality Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Personality Inventory/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care , Age Factors , Aged , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Anxiety Disorders/therapy , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Mood Disorders/diagnosis , Mood Disorders/psychology , Mood Disorders/therapy , Psychometrics , Reference Values , Referral and Consultation , Reproducibility of Results
20.
Pain Med ; 10(2): 356-63, 2009 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18823387

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This forum presents a clinical vignette of orofacial pain and expounds on ethical issues related to opioid therapy in the context of multidisciplinary treatment. The purpose of this forum is to assist health care providers from different disciplines in identifying ethical issues and conflicts regarding opioid therapy encountered in multidisciplinary clinical pain practices. DESIGN: We use the case vignette and opioid therapy as a backdrop for a discussion of 1) an overview of ethics terminology; 2) a presentation of key ethics principles; 3) our conceptualization of ethical obligations of patients regarding opioid therapy; and 4) the process of developing an appropriate treatment plan within the context of the discussed ethical principles.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Pain Clinics/ethics , Pain/drug therapy , Chickenpox/complications , Cholecystectomy , Chronic Disease , Diazepam/adverse effects , Facial Pain/drug therapy , Female , Herpes Zoster/complications , Humans , Hydrocodone/adverse effects , Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects , Hysterectomy , Opioid-Related Disorders/etiology , Opioid-Related Disorders/therapy , Uterine Neoplasms/complications , Uterine Neoplasms/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...