Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARD) and Combination Therapy of Conventional DMARD in Patients with Spondyloarthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis with Axial Involvement.

Treatment with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID) is the recommended first-line therapy in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA); and for those patients who have persistently active disease, the introduction of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors is indicated. Conventional nonbiological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD), although effective and used in clinical practice for peripheral arthritis, are not recommended. Few studies have been conducted with the aim of evaluating the effect of conventional DMARD, either alone or in combination, in axSpA. As for psoriatic arthritis (PsA), DMARD are widely used, but few trials are available about their effects on axial involvement, which is not often assessed as a primary outcome in clinical trials. In rheumatoid arthritis, combination therapy of 2 or more conventional DMARD appears to confer better response than methotrexate monotherapy, and may even be a viable alternative to TNF-α inhibitors. In peripheral PsA, combination therapy can be used after treatment failure with 1 DMARD, but few studies have been conducted. However, available evidence for the combination of conventional DMARD indicates a lack of any significant benefit on axial symptoms; thus this treatment approach does not represent an effective alternative to anti-TNF-α therapy.

Body weight, gender and response to TNF-α blockers in axial spondyloarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether BMI and gender could lead to a different response rate to anti-TNF agents in patients affected by axial SpA. METHODS: One hundred and seventy patients with active axial SpA (defined as a BASDAI ≥ 4) treated with an anti-TNF agent [adalimumab (ADA), etanercept (ETA), infliximab (IFX)] were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided according to the baseline BMI as normal weight (BMI < 25), overweight (BMI 25-30) and obese (BMI ≥ 30). After 12 months of treatment a 50% improvement of the initial BASDAI (BASDAI50) was the primary end point and BASDAI ≤ 1 was the secondary end point. RESULTS: After 12 months of anti-TNF treatment, 67.8% of men and 46.2% of women reached the BASDAI50 (P = 0.01). According to BMI categories, the rate of BASDAI50 achievement decreased from 72.8% in normal weight subjects to 54.5% in overweight and 30.4% in obese subjects (P < 0.001). In the logistic regression analysis, the best independent predictors of failure to obtain a BASDAI50 response at the 12th month of therapy in axial SpA patients were female gender [odds ratio (OR) 3.23 (95% CI 1.52, 7.14)] and a BMI ≥ 30 [OR 3.57 (95% CI 1.15, 11.11)]. Analysing outcomes based on IFX therapy (the larger subgroup), the BASDAI50 response rate fell from 79.0% in normal weight subjects to 56.7% in overweight and 16.7% in obese subjects (P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed with ADA and ETA. CONCLUSION: Data suggest that being female, overweight and mostly obese is associated with a lower rate of success in obtaining response status in axial SpA patients treated with anti-TNF drugs. Body weight could represent a modifiable factor to reach the best outcome in axial SpA patients treated with TNF blockers.

Polymorphisms of the IgH enhancer HS1.2 and risk of systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the allelic frequency variation of the HS1.2 enhancer of the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) 3' regulatory region (3'RR-1) locus represents a risk factor for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and to identify a possible functional difference in the two most frequent alleles (*1 and *2) in binding nuclear factor- κB (NF-κB) and Sp1. METHODS: The frequency of the enhancer HS1.2 alleles was determined in two cohorts of patients with SLE (n=293) and in 1185 controls. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) were carried out with B cell nuclear extracts with different probes of HS1.2 alleles *1 and *2 to map the consensus binding sites of the nuclear factors. A confirmatory cohort of 121 patients with SLE was also included. RESULTS: The frequency of allele *2 of the HS1.2 enhancer was significantly increased in patients with SLE compared with controls (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.33 to 1.92, p<0.001). EMSA experiments showed the presence of the Sp1 binding site in both alleles whereas only allele *2 carried the consensus for the NF-κB factor. The presence versus absence of allele *2 in patients with SLE correlated with a higher concentration of IgM levels and with the expression of B cell activating factor receptor (BAFF-R). CONCLUSIONS: The increased frequency of allele *2 in patients with SLE identifies a new genetic risk factor for SLE. A possible biological effect of the polymorphism could be the difference observed in the localisation of an NF-κB binding site which is specific for allele *2 and absent in allele *1. These observations suggest a functional effect of the HS1.2 enhancer in this disease.