A prospective randomized pilot study of near-infrared spectroscopy-directed restricted fluid therapy versus standard fluid therapy in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.

There are substantial data supporting the concept that algorithms that effectively limit fluid volumes to patients undergoing elective surgery, particularly intraoperatively, significantly reduce perioperative morbidity. We hypothesized that intraoperative fluid limitation could be safely accomplished when guided by near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) monitoring, and that this fluid restriction regimen would result in a reduction in postoperative morbidity when compared with standard monitoring and fluid therapy. The intent of this pilot study was to demonstrate the feasibility and ease of conduct of this study protocol before expanding to the multicenter pivotal trial. We performed a prospective, (2:1) randomized, pilot study at two centers. A total enrollment of 24 fully evaluable patients undergoing elective open colorectal surgery (16 restricted, 8 standard) was planned. After providing informed consent, patients were randomized to standard fluid resuscitation (500 LR induction bolus, then LR 7 mL/kg/h x 1 h, then 5 mL/kg/h) or restricted fluid resuscitation (no induction bolus, then LR 2 mL/kg/h). Subsequent fluid bolus infusions were guided by physiologic parameters (systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg, heart rate > 100 bpm, or oliguria) in the standard group, and by tissue oxygen saturation from NIRS (tissue oxygen saturation (StO2) < 75%, or 20% below baseline; or the same physiologic parameters) in the restricted group. Primary endpoints were major postoperative complications. A total of 27 patients were randomized (18 restricted, 9 standard). Age, gender, ethnicity, past medical history, and body mass index were similar. American Society of Anesthesiologists class was somewhat higher in the restricted group (American Society of Anesthesiologists class 3 in 77% of restricted vs 44% of standard patients; P = 0.194). Median total intraoperative fluids were less in the restricted group (1300 mL) when compared with the standard group (3014 mL) (P = 0.021). Total fluids for the hospitalization were also statistically significantly decreased in the restricted group. Complications occurred in about two-thirds of patients, and complication rates were not statistically different between groups (1.6/restricted patient vs 2.1/standard patient; P = 0.333). Primary indications for boluses (n = 93) given to study patients were: hypotension (69%); oliguria (15%); and tachycardia (14%), with multiple indications per bolus. In only two instances did the StO2 drop to less than 75 per cent, or decrease by 20 per cent from baseline in the 3 minutes before bolus as an indication for fluid administration. Patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery with a fluid restricted strategy had only rare episodes of decreased StO2, suggesting that adequate tissue perfusion was maintained in this group. As a result, NIRS monitoring did not significantly influence intraoperative fluid management of patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Research and commentary: Change in exercise tolerance, activity and sleep patterns, and quality of life in patients with cancer participating in a structured exercise program.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To investigate the feasibility of an exercise program patterned after a phase II cardiac rehabilitation program to improve selected physiologic and psychological parameters of health in patients with cancer. DESIGN: Prospective, repeated measures study. SETTING: Two major military medical centers in the southwestern United States. SAMPLE: 62 patients diagnosed with cancer within the previous two years. Ages ranged from 24-83 (meanX = 59). Half of the participants were male and half were female. Minorities made up 29% of the sample. Participants had a wide range of cancer diagnoses and all stages of cancer. Fifteen subjects were undergoing treatment when they enrolled in the study. More than half of the subjects exercised prior to their cancer diagnoses, but fewer than half were able to resume an exercise routine following their cancer diagnoses. METHODS: Subjects met two days each week for 12 weeks for exercise and education. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Exercise tolerance as measured with a graded exercise test, activity and sleep patterns as measured with a wrist actigraph, and quality of life (QOL) as measured with the Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System-Short Form. FINDINGS: Significant improvements were observed over time in exercise tolerance, selected activity and sleep patterns, and QOL among the 46 (74%) subjects who completed the program. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with various types and stages of cancer can safely exercise using a cardiac rehabilitation model and can realize significant improvements in exercise tolerance, selected activity and sleep patterns, and QOL. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Most people are aware that regular exercise is part of a healthy lifestyle. After cancer diagnosis and treatment, patients experience uncertainty regarding how to resume exercise or how to begin an exercise program as part of their rehabilitation. Participation in a structured exercise program can provide patients with a safe environment within which to exercise at an intensity appropriate to their individual needs.